headers
Sven Guckes | 1 Oct 2002 01:13
Picon
Picon

Re: reply-to alternatives

* Hanspeter Roth <hanspeter_roth <at> hotmail.com> [2002-09-30 20:12]:
> are there alternative headers to Reply-To:
> and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs?

"we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you."

of course there are more headers - and all of them
are probably only supported by this one mailer.
use whatever you like - but please do
not expect mutt to support any of these.

Sven
Permalink | Reply | 19 comments |
headers
Robert Lillack | 1 Oct 2002 01:29
Picon

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt -> unmailboxes does not exist

Sven Guckes wrote:

> workaround: quit  and restart.  in which  case you  do not
> really need to update anything, right? ;-)

...or using Nicolas' patch. It works like a charm.

Rob.
--

-- 
Nöö, vpu jne wn nhpu Mviv. :-)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Will Yardley | 1 Oct 2002 01:47

Re: .procmailrc

Bernard Massot wrote:

> I'm using this one :
> :0: 
>     * ^TO.*mutt-users <at> (mutt.org|.*gbnet.net)
>     ML/mutt-users

I believe that TO.* is redundant, since there's already a ".*" built in
to ^TO and ^TO_

--

-- 
Will Yardley
input: william <  <at>  hq . newdream . net . >
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kurt Lieber | 1 Oct 2002 01:55

Re: Updating screen when new mail arrives on samba share

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:50:23PM -0400 or thereabouts, Joel Hammer wrote:
> I suppose this is some awkward interaction between mutt and samba. I am not
> sure where to start.  Is there some simple command in mutt to reread the
> mailbox?

Have you tried synchronizing the mailbox? ($ is the default binding)  

--kurt
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bernard Massot | 1 Oct 2002 02:08
Picon
Favicon

Re: .procmailrc

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:53:10PM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:
> 
> 
>      * From: Sven Guckes
>      * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
>      * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700
> 
> [...]
> 
>   :0:
>   * ^TO_mutt-(announce|users) <at> (mutt\.org|gbnet\.net)
doesn't always works, see message <20020930113812.GD21367 <at> ns.gbnet.net>:
 To: mutt-users <at> ns.gbnet.net
--

-- 
Bernard Massot
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Patrick | 1 Oct 2002 02:09
Picon

Re: .procmailrc

* Oliver Fuchs <oliverfuchs1 <at> gmx.de> [09-30-02 18:56]:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote:
> 
> > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering,
> > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users
> > email. I'm currently using:
> > 
> > :0 :
> > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*)
> > mutt-users
> > 
> > :0 :
> > * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*)
> > mutt-users
> > 
> > :0 :
> > * ^From:.*(mutt-.*)
> > mutt-users
> > 
> > An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength).
> 
> An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives:
> 
> 
>      * From: Sven Guckes
>      * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists
>      * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700
> 
> [...]
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Thomas Dickey | 1 Oct 2002 02:32
Picon

Re: Where config mutt to use lynx and *not* Galeon?

On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:13:27AM -0700, seberino <at> spawar.navy.mil wrote:
> Default Red Hat 7.3 uses Galeon to read html email in mutt.
> 
> Where do I change this to lynx???

in your $HOME/.mailcap, a line like this for instance:

text/html; lynx-cs -force_html -stdin

(there are several ways to do it)

--

-- 
Thomas E. Dickey <dickey <at> invisible-island.net>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |
headers
Mike Leone | 1 Oct 2002 03:58

Re: fast conversion of html mail to text

* Sven Guckes (guckes <at> math.fu-berlin.de) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 20:56: 
> * Sven Guckes said:
> > well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter
> > then you were asking for it - so it's your problem.
> 
> * Michael Leone <turgon <at> mike-leone.com> [2002-09-26 17:27]:
> > It's *not* a problem, for me, anyway.
> 
> so you are ignoring the extra but superfluous data - fine.

Not ignoring it. And it's not (always) superflous - some people *want* their
email to be read in the way they present it - links, colors, etc. So I have
mutt call out w3m to see HTML-only email. Or I ignore it, if I feel like.
Like anything else, it's my choice. As ignoring it is your choice.

> > To: <guckes <at> math.fu-berlin.de>
> > Cc: <mutt-users <at> mutt.org>
> > X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.7)
> 
> but you are obviously are also ignoring the fact that i am
> subscribed to the list and therefore do *not* need any CCs.

Usually, I edit that out, and have the list as the only email address in the
TO:, but I didn't bother that time.

> webmailers *suck*.  and if it is not the mailer
> then it must be the people using them.  *hrmpf*

Go have a beer or something, Sven - people will like you better if you're
less grumpy over things that are really not all that world-shattering.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Mike Leone | 1 Oct 2002 04:03

Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

* David Britton (davidpbritton <at> yahoo.com) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 19:46: 
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> >
> > In particular, it is my understanding that there is some
> > way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the server. Maybe
> > it's LDAP? 
> 
> If so than you may be in luck.
> 
> > Perhaps it has something to do with the query functions? Do I need an
> > external program to help? 
> 
> Absolutely you will.  Thus, the rest of this mail is a bit "Off-Topic"
> for this list.
> 
> > Is there a HOWTO somewhere (Google did not find anything useful for
> > "mutt exchange howto")?
> 
> Mutt would have nothing to do with this...  So your search probably
> wouldn't be that useful...  Furthermore, I don't know of a way (outside
> of maybe Ximian's "Exchange Connector" program) to interface with
> Exchange address books from non-M$ platforms.  If you have an LDAP

Exchange, by default, makes it's Global Address Books available via LDAP, so
anything that reads LDAP can read it off of Exchange that way. Not so for
personal address books.
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
mjbjr | 1 Oct 2002 04:25

Mutt can't find new gpg location

Last night, I installed the just released gnupg-1.2.0.

The default location for the new gpg version is /usr/bin opposed to the old
/usr/local/bin.  After deleting the old, mutt could no longer find gpg.
Both dirs are in my PATH.  

I've put a link from the old to the new, and now mutt works with the new gpg.

I checked the master Muttrc, /usr/local/etc/Muttrc, but didn't see any place
to specify the location of pgp, though there are tons of pgp config stuff in it.

Is there a place to tell mutt where gpg is?  

Shouldn't/couldn't mutt use my PATH to find apps it needs?

Thank you.

--

-- 
                            - Martin J. Brown, Jr. -
                            - mjbjr <at> beaudesign.com -

      Public PGP Key ID: 0xDB184F7B keyserver: http://certserver.pgp.com/
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane