1 Nov 02:48
Re: IMAP, mark_old and new mail
Brendan Cully <brendan <at> kublai.com>
2006-11-01 01:48:10 GMT
2006-11-01 01:48:10 GMT
On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 at 15:55, Bob Bell wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:16:02PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > >On Tuesday, 31 October 2006 at 15:07, Bob Bell wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:08:08AM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote: > >> Are you expecting to see a "OK [UIDNEXT" reply to a "SELECT"? There's > >> code in imap.c that's at least handling it, but my IMAP server isn't > >> saying it. Here's a very brief conversation with my IMAP server > >> (provided to illustrate what Courier says in response to SELECT): > > > >Oh. Yes, I am. It's required by RFC 3501 (section 6.3.1). There's > >probably a way to get mutt to synthesize the value though. > > Now that I know what I'm looking for, I found the following in the > ChangeLog: > > 2006-03-15 12:26:00 Brendan Cully <brendan <at> kublai.com> (brendan) > > * imap/message.c: Don't store UIDNEXT unless we know it. > > * imap/message.c: Only synthesize UIDNEXT if we've fetched > uncached messages. Fixes a FETCH 1:0 bug Bruno Postle reported and > helped to debug. > > 2006-03-13 23:21:51 Brendan Cully <brendan <at> kublai.com> (brendan) > > * imap/message.c: Courier fails to send UIDNEXT on SELECT > (a violation of RFC 3501 section 6.3.1) - synthesize it if it > is missing. > > * init.h: Make imap_idle default to false for 1.5.12.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed