headers
Thomas Roessler | 1 Aug 2004 05:00

[2004-08-01] CVS repository changes

This message was generated and sent automatically.  It contains a
summary of the CVS commits over the last 48 hours.  These changes
should be propagated to the public repository within at most a day
or two.  Most probably, they have already been propagated.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Nathan Dushman | 2 Aug 2004 03:11
Picon

Re: [PATCH] minor IMAP improvement, addresses bug #1655

Oops, minor error - that should be '<=' and not '<'.
Please fix in CVS.

Nathan

ps. sorry about the duplicate submission from an address not subscribed to 
the list

On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:21:49PM -0400, Brendan Cully wrote:
> This makes sense. I think it should be committed. (But if you're going
> to open a 10k message IMAP mailbox, you should probably also be using
> Glanzmann's IMAP header cache patch).
> 
> On Wednesday, 21 July 2004 at 14:53, Nathan Dushman wrote:
> > This is a one-line patch that increases the speed at which mutt opens IMAP 
> > mailboxes, and addresses bug #1655.  Any chance of comitting it?  Thanks,
> > 
> > Nathan
> > 
> > +++ imap/command.c.new       Tue Sep 30 20:43:04 2003
> >  <at>  <at>  -461,6 +461,7  <at>  <at> 
> >  
> >    msgno = atoi (s);
> >    
> > +       if (msgno < idata->ctx->msgcount)
> >    /* see cmd_parse_expunge */
> >    for (cur = 0; cur < idata->ctx->msgcount; cur++)
> >    {
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Thomas Roessler | 2 Aug 2004 05:00

[2004-08-02] CVS repository changes

This message was generated and sent automatically.  It contains a
summary of the CVS commits over the last 48 hours.  These changes
should be propagated to the public repository within at most a day
or two.  Most probably, they have already been propagated.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Wilkinson, Alex | 2 Aug 2004 09:43
Picon

mutt sidebar patch

Hi all, 

I am just wondering whether or not this patch will be committed to HEAD any
time soon ?

http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~jrh29/mutt/patch-1.5.6.jrh.sidebar.13.

 - aW
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Vincent Lefevre | 2 Aug 2004 12:13

Re: mutt sidebar patch

On 2004-08-02 17:13:33 +0930, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~jrh29/mutt/patch-1.5.6.jrh.sidebar.13.

I haven't tried it, but would it be possible to specify the minimum
width of the terminal for which the mailbox list pane may appear (so
that it could appear or disappear when the user needs to resize his
terminal window)?

--

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent <at> vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% validated (X)HTML - Acorn / RISC OS / ARM, free software, YP17,
Championnat International des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Hendrik Mangels | 2 Aug 2004 12:28
Picon
Picon

Re: mutt sidebar patch

Vincent Lefevre (2004-08-02, 12:13):
> > http://vorlon.cwru.edu/~jrh29/mutt/patch-1.5.6.jrh.sidebar.13.
> 
> I haven't tried it, but would it be possible to specify the minimum
> width of the terminal for which the mailbox list pane may appear (so
> that it could appear or disappear when the user needs to resize his
> terminal window)?

AFAIK not possible.

Hendrik
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Thomas Glanzmann | 2 Aug 2004 18:23
Picon
Picon

Re: Mutt hcache patch

Hello Niels,

> I'm very interested trying your Mutt hcache patch, since I use Mutt with
> various large (local and IMAP) mailboxes. I do have a problem enabling the
> patch on my Debian box, which shouldn't be a problem according to your
> e-mail on the mutt-dev list.

the problem is that the mutt-port doesn't generate configure from
configure.in. So USE_HCACE, HAVE_GDBM and the extra sources are not added
in the Makefile and config.h I tweaked it manually in and build you a
debian package.

http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/mutt/mutt_1.5.6-20040722+1_i386.deb

Honestly,
	Thomas
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Niels den Otter | 2 Aug 2004 18:48
Picon
Picon

Re: Mutt hcache patch

Hello Thomas,

On Monday,  2 August 2004, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> > I'm very interested trying your Mutt hcache patch, since I use Mutt with
> > various large (local and IMAP) mailboxes. I do have a problem enabling the
> > patch on my Debian box, which shouldn't be a problem according to your
> > e-mail on the mutt-dev list.
> 
> the problem is that the mutt-port doesn't generate configure from
> configure.in. So USE_HCACE, HAVE_GDBM and the extra sources are not added
> in the Makefile and config.h I tweaked it manually in and build you a
> debian package.
> 
> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/mutt/mutt_1.5.6-20040722+1_i386.deb

Thanks a lot. I've just installed it on my laptop.

The hcache files grows so things appear to be working:
 -rw-------    1 otter otter 1606648 Aug  2 18:46 hcache

I'll give you more feedback after a couple of days use.

-- Niels
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Adeodato Simó | 3 Aug 2004 00:29
Picon

Re: Mutt hcache patch

* Thomas Glanzmann [Mon, 02 Aug 2004 18:23:41 +0200]:

  hi Thomas,

> http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/mutt/mutt_1.5.6-20040722+1_i386.deb

  please consider not using the exact same version as the one
  distributed by debian, unless you don't intend to make the package
  public (which is not the case).

  mutt_1.5.6-20040722+1+hcache should be fine.

  thanks,

--

-- 
Adeodato Simó
    EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself.  Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.
                -- George Bernard Shaw
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Thomas Glanzmann | 3 Aug 2004 00:43
Picon
Picon

Re: Mutt hcache patch

Hi Adeodato,

>   please consider not using the exact same version as the one
>   distributed by debian, unless you don't intend to make the package
>   public (which is not the case).

that was stupid. I will account it the next time.

	Thomas
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane