Hello all, Mew version 4.0.65 has been released: ftp://ftp.mew.org/pub/Mew/alpha/mew-4.0.65.tar.gz The highlights of the version include: * Composition of old fashioned PGP messages * New address completion * Prevention of HTML parsing * Received: visualizer For more information, see info. --Kazu
[mew CVS 2004-04-16] [emacs CVS 2004-05-30] If I apply indent-region to this: foo bar baz I get this: > foo > bar > baz but I want this: > foo > > bar > > baz The documentation of comment-region says this: Comment or uncomment each line in the region.(Continue reading)
From: Werner LEMBERG <wl <at> gnu.org> Subject: [mew-int 01819] better indent-region wanted > Is this a bug in emacs, or can this be easily changed within mew? How? This is not related to Mew at all. I don't know it's a bug of Emacs or not. --Kazu
Hello all,
As I mentioned time to time, I have started to re-structure the
current mark scheme.
The motivation of a new mark scheme is as follows:
(1) The meaning of the " <at> " mark is ambiguous.
(2) The "*" mark is used both for revew and as targets of a
work.
(a) Suppose Summary has messages marked with "*" for
review. And you want to pick messages and to forward
them. When you pick messages, "*" for review and "*" for
forward are merged.
(3) There are no read/unread mark.
I will implement a new mark scheme to solve the problems above step by
step. And I will explain changes when necessary.
To solve the problem (1) and (2), I have already committed my
implementation to the CVS tree.
- The " <at> " mark is obsoleted.
- Commands such as "F", "M-b", etc now work for messages
marked with "*".
(Continue reading)
From: Kazu Yamamoto (山本和彦) <kazu <at> iijlab.net>
Subject: Re: [mew-int 01791] Re: Another message is being sent. Try later
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:36:24 +0900 (JST)
> From: mew <at> gustad.com
> Subject: [mew-int 01791] Re: Another message is being sent. Try later
>
> > Not unlikely, but I can't see how restarting Mew within emacs would
> > fix this problem. How does mew detect that another message is being
> > sent?
>
> (1) Check ~/Mail/Smtplog to see whether or not the previous message was
> actually sent. (i.e. "status=sent")
Yes. I've never seen anything other than "status=sent" in the Smtplog
file.
> (2) If you can reproduce this, please sent *Backtrace* of the previous
> session of SMTP. You can see how to do it in the following page.
*Backtrace*
Signaling: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil)
string-match(".wrk$" nil)
mew-queue-enqueue(nil "+queue")
mew-smtp-queue(nil "501 5.5.4 <nil>... Domain name required for sender address nil.")
mew-smtp-filter(#<process mew-smtp-info-smtp.home.gustad.com> "501 5.5.4 <nil>... Domain name
required for sender address nil\n")
in the *Mew debug* buffer I observe the following suspicious piece of
(Continue reading)
Hello,
There were no opinions on the "$" mark. So, I went to the next step.
I have implemented the "redo" feature of the "*" mark.
After undoing the "*" marks with 'U*', you can redo with 'M*'.
A typical story:
Suppose you have messages marked with "*". You want to pick some
messages and do somthing (e.g. multi forwarding). But you don't want
to merge the old "*" marks and the new "*" marks because picking is
a just temporary work.
(1) Type 'U*' to undo the original marks.
(2) Pick some massages and do somthing for the messages marked with
"*" newly.
(3) Type 'M*' to restore the original marks.
Note this cannot be accomplished the "$" mark since picking does not
mark a message already marked with "$".
--Kazu
Hi, Previously I had bogofilter installed manually ( not part of SuSE 8.2 ). Having now 'upgraded' to 9.1 I cannot get the suppled bogofilter to register anything as spam. Spamicity always reported as 00000.00000 etc. Has nayone managed to get the latest version to work. I see that the commandline arguments have changed but resetting them to what appears as if ti should work achieves nothing. Many thanks Francesco
On October 29, 2003, [mew-int 01565],
kazu (at iijlab.net) wrote:
> I did as follows:
>
> If 'windows-1252 is defined, windows-125x series are registered.
> Otherwise, cp125x series are registered.
>
> I hope that everybody is happy with this.
I discovered that XEmacs users were unhappy with it.
XEmacs 21.4.15 supports windows-1251, but windows-1252 is not yet
supported.
Emacs 21.3.50 supports both windows-1251 and windows-1252.
Could you apply the following patch?
-----
--- mew-mule3.el 31 May 2004 07:14:43 -0000 1.35
+++ mew-mule3.el 28 Jun 2004 22:54:19 -0000
<at> <at> -164,7 +164,7 <at> <at>
("utf-7" . utf-7)
("unicode-1-1-utf-7" . utf-7) ;; the old UTF-7 name, RFC 1642
("utf-8" . utf-8)
- , <at> (if (mew-coding-system-p 'windows-1252)
+ , <at> (if (mew-coding-system-p 'windows-1251)
'(("windows-1250" . windows-1250)
("windows-1251" . windows-1251)
(Continue reading)
On June 28, 2004, [mew-int 01825],
fgs (at epulse.net) wrote:
> Previously I had bogofilter installed manually ( not part of SuSE
> 8.2 ). Having now 'upgraded' to 9.1 I cannot get the suppled
> bogofilter to register anything as spam. Spamicity always
> reported as 00000.00000 etc. Has nayone managed to get the
> latest version to work.
Mew 4 (4.0.62 or later) has the following default values and they
works fine with bogofilter 0.92.0 (Debian package 0.92.0-1).
| (defcustom mew-spam-prog "bogofilter"
| (defcustom mew-spam-prog-args '("-s" "-N" "-v")
| (defcustom mew-ham-prog "bogofilter"
| (defcustom mew-ham-prog-args '("-n" "-S" "-v")
I got the following results:
* Copy the message [mew-int 01825] to ~/Mail/inbox/1
* Backup my ~/.bogofilter
| $ mv ~/.bogofilter ~/.bogofilter.BAK
* Run bogofilter (won't work, because ~/.bogofilter is not ready)
| $ bogofilter -p -I ~/Mail/inbox/1 | grep ^X-Bogo
| Can't open file 'wordlist.db' in directory '/home/tats/.bogofilter'.
| error #2 - No such file or directory.
(Continue reading)
RSS Feed4 | |
|---|---|
3 | |
2 | |
5 | |
12 | |
4 | |
2 | |
1 | |
7 | |
9 | |
8 | |
11 | |
15 | |
12 | |
13 | |
11 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 | |
2 | |
7 | |
2 | |
8 | |
15 | |
15 | |
4 | |
5 | |
19 | |
1 | |
4 | |
21 | |
10 | |
11 | |
18 | |
10 | |
43 | |
17 | |
13 | |
21 | |
12 | |
14 | |
13 | |
3 | |
3 | |
2 | |
6 | |
7 | |
15 | |
10 | |
20 | |
18 | |
10 | |
23 | |
35 | |
33 | |
19 | |
21 | |
30 | |
12 | |
26 | |
6 | |
24 | |
5 | |
26 | |
4 | |
17 | |
29 | |
14 | |
5 | |
6 | |
2 | |
19 | |
8 | |
15 | |
19 | |
4 | |
16 | |
4 | |
4 | |
29 | |
23 | |
13 | |
2 | |
8 | |
24 | |
1 | |
7 | |
15 | |
3 | |
4 | |
1 | |
10 | |
7 | |
13 | |
47 | |
19 | |
37 | |
3 | |
16 | |
16 | |
13 | |
32 | |
10 | |
13 | |
11 | |
1 | |
46 | |
39 | |
5 | |
54 | |
77 | |
34 | |
34 | |
7 | |
25 | |
34 | |
41 | |
45 | |
75 | |
24 | |
31 | |
67 | |
27 | |
51 | |
12 |
