headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 8 Jul 2003 02:16

[mew-int 01484] Re:

Sorry for the late response. I was very busy in last week.

> I have a problem. After replying a mail, there is no mark on the mail
> I have just replied. Sometimes I use Mutt, in that case, when I reply a 
> mail, the mark, letter 'r', appears on the mail. I want to konw, whether
> Mew can do the mark on the mail just replied automatically.

This feature will be implemented.

I'm now tackling to IMAP stuff and many problems are solved. The next
is a new mark architecture.

--Kazu
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 8 Jul 2003 02:21

[mew-int 01485] Re: Whishlist

Hello,

> Since +A/B/ is redundant and may be quite long, is it possible that
> the choices are displayed as
> 
> a1
> a2
> ...

This makes sense. But hard to implement.

> (This would also be coherent with file completion.)

File completion is dynamically done by scanning a directory. However,
folder completion is statically done with a prepared list of full-path
folders.

> Another thing: when one wants to save the body of a mail with no
> message but with a text file as first attachment (which is then
> displayed instead of the message), it would be nice if Mew used the
> filename the the MIME header (if indicated).

I don't understand this well. Would you please send me an example?

I think Mew makes use of a file name if included.

--Kazu
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 8 Jul 2003 10:46

[mew-int 01486] Mew 4.0.54

Hello all,

I have migrated from POP to IMAP and have lived for several days.
Many bugs appeared and I have fixed most of them. Some IMAP features
are still missing, though, I think Mew 4.0.54 is much more stable and
flexible than before in the IMAP point of view.

If you are using Mew 4.0.53 or earlier, you need to run two scripts
under the "alpha" directory. Concrete explanations are found in
the scripts and 00changes.

	ftp://ftp.mew.org/pub/Mew/alpha/mew-4.0.54.tar.gz

Enjoy!

--Kazu
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Christophe TROESTLER | 8 Jul 2003 12:25
Picon

[mew-int 01487] Re: Whishlist

On Tue, 08 Jul 2003, Kazu Yamamoto (山本和彦) <kazu <at> iijlab.net> wrote:
> 
> > Another thing: when one wants to save the body of a mail with no
> > message but with a text file as first attachment (which is then
> > displayed instead of the message), it would be nice if Mew used the
> > filename the the MIME header (if indicated).
> 
> I don't understand this well. Would you please send me an example?
> I think Mew makes use of a file name if included.

I just sent you two (slightly different) examples.  Since there is no
"Cover", the first part (a text attachment) is displayed inline.
Press "y" then "n" on that part (i.e., on the "mail line"); no
filename is suggested (while the MIME header says otherwise).

Cheers,
ChriS
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 14 Jul 2003 05:33

[mew-int 01488] Re: Whishlist

From: Christophe TROESTLER <debian00 <at> tiscali.be>
Subject: Re: [mew-int 01485] Re: Whishlist

> I just sent you two (slightly different) examples.  Since there is no
> "Cover", the first part (a text attachment) is displayed inline.
> Press "y" then "n" on that part (i.e., on the "mail line"); no
> filename is suggested (while the MIME header says otherwise).

I think this problem has been solved.

--Kazu
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 16 Jul 2003 06:47

[mew-int 01489] Mew 3.3 release candidate 4

Hello guys,

Since we found a security bug of SSL in Mew 3.3rc3, we need to 
release one more release candidate:

	ftp://ftp.mew.org/pub/Mew/beta/mew-3.3rc4.tar.gz

Also, scanning Summary mode of the version is faster than rc3.

--Kazu
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
henri | 21 Jul 2003 00:25

[mew-int 01490] refiling question

quick question:

how do i get mew to auto-refile emails marked w/ X-Spam-Flag: YES
into my +spam folder?

while tweaking my spam filter i have had it setup so that
the messages are marked to get refiled, but i have to
actually hit "x" to get them to be refiled. i would now like
the messages to automatically be refiled (not just marked)
so that they never show up in my inbox.

thanks

henri
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 22 Jul 2003 09:48

[mew-int 01491] Re: refiling question

Hello Henri,

> how do i get mew to auto-refile emails marked w/ X-Spam-Flag: YES
> into my +spam folder?

How about this?

(setq mew-refile-guess-alist
      '(("X-Spam-Flag:"
	 ("YES" . "+spam"))))

--Kazu
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Arnaud Vandyck | 22 Jul 2003 13:12
X-Face
Picon

[mew-int 01492] Re: refiling question

Kazu Yamamoto (山本和彦) <kazu <at> iijlab.net> wrote:
> (setq mew-refile-guess-alist
>       '(("X-Spam-Flag:"
> 	 ("YES" . "+spam"))))

And what is mew-inbox-action-alist?

-- Arnaud Vandyck, STE fi, ULg
   Formateur Cellule Programmation.
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Kazu Yamamoto | 22 Jul 2003 13:16

[mew-int 01493] Re: refiling question

From: Arnaud Vandyck <arnaud.vandyck <at> ulg.ac.be>
Subject: [mew-int 01492] Re: refiling question

> And what is mew-inbox-action-alist?

It's document says as follows:

--Kazu

*This variable controls actions when retrieving messages.
Currently this works only when 'i' with POP or 'mewl/incm'.
You can put any marks, typically 'o' and 'D' according to message
headers.

This value must be a list of entries. An entry is a list whose first
element is a field defined in 'mew-scan-fields'. 

If the second element is a list, the first element of the list must be
a mark (e.g. ?D) or a string which is a comma separated folders (e.g
"+foo,+bar" for ?o). Other elements of the list are regular
expressions to be matched to the value of the field.

With the following configuration, Mew marks messages whose Subject:
matches "adult" or "money" with 'D'. And Mew marks messages whose
Subject is "daily log" with 'o' to be refiled "+log". Also Mew
marks messages whose Content-Type: contains "gb2312" with 'D'.

(setq mew-inbox-action-alist
      '(("Subject:"
	 (?D "adult" "money")
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane