1 Aug 2009 12:00
Re: E-Mail Encryption
Frank Leonhardt <t200907 <at> fjl.co.uk>
2009-08-01 10:00:49 GMT
2009-08-01 10:00:49 GMT
On 25/07/2009 10:37, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:39:25PM +0100, Frank Leonhardt (t200907 <at> fjl.co.uk) wrote: > >>> How much good do your locks do when police comes and wants to >>> confiscate your servers because they suspect one of your users >>> has done something criminal? Do you trust they take as good care >>> of the machines as you do? >> How do you know I'm *not* the Police? > > I don't. But I do know dovecot is being used by people who are not, > and probably also some who have a reason to distrust the police. > >> We're in very interesting territory here, and it's going to depend on your >> local laws. In England the police are pretty okay > > Sure. Ditto in Finland. But not everywhere. <SNIP> I think we can all agree on that. However, in practical terms it's better if the email users encrypt their own mail and keep the ISP out of it. If the mail user is a friend then they're putting you in a difficult situation (you get tortured instead of them....). If if your a big ISP (e.g. Yahoo) then commercial considerations mean you don't care anyway. >> The main reason I'd be in favour of application-based file encryption is to >> get around the fact that whole-disk encryption is meaningless as(Continue reading)
RSS Feed