Jerry | 1 Oct 2009 12:59
Face
Picon
Favicon

Fetchmail refuses to deliver some messages

This is fetchmail release 6.3.11+RPA+SDPS+SSL+OPIE+NLS.

I have been finding this notation in the fetchmail log file quite
consistently:

fetchmail: reading message recent:me <at> mydomain.com <at> gmail-pop.l.google.com:1 of 2 (2239 octets) (log
message incomplete)
fetchmail: SMTP error: 501 5.1.7 Bad sender address syntax
fetchmail:  not flushed

This is the e-mail headers from the problem message:

Delivered-To: me <at> mydomain.com
Received: by 10.216.46.134 with SMTP id r6cs313217web;
        Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.131.5 with SMTP id e5mr1046587ybd.262.1254359047461;
        Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <abfsupajsih <at> ??????>
Received: from ?????? ([211.225.33.79])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 19si23490503gxk.29.2009.09.30.18.04.06;
        Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: best guess record for domain of transitioning
abfsupajsih <at> \ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd does not designate 211.225.33.79 as permitted sender) client-ip=211.225.33.79;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=softfail (google.com: best guess record for domain of
transitioning abfsupajsih <at> \ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd does not designate 211.225.33.79 as permitted
sender) smtp.mail=abfsupajsih <at> \ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd
Received: from 211.225.33.79 by mailstore1.secureserver.net; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:04:05 +0900
Date:	Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:04:05 +0900
From:	=?koi8-r?B?IkVsdmlhIEphY29ic2VuIg==?= <abfsupajsih <at> \ufffd\u03bf\u0230\ufffd>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.80.03) Educational
(Continue reading)

Rob MacGregor | 1 Oct 2009 13:53
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Fetchmail refuses to deliver some messages

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:59, Jerry <gesbbb <at> yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is fetchmail release 6.3.11+RPA+SDPS+SSL+OPIE+NLS.
>
> I have been finding this notation in the fetchmail log file quite
> consistently:
>
> fetchmail: reading message recent:me <at> mydomain.com <at> gmail-pop.l.google.com:1 of 2 (2239 octets)
(log message incomplete)
> fetchmail: SMTP error: 501 5.1.7 Bad sender address syntax
> fetchmail:  not flushed

Can you provide the full log.  We'll also need the log from your SMTP
server since that is what's performing the rejection, not fetchmail
(the SMTP error makes that clear).

--

-- 
                 Please keep list traffic on the list.

Rob MacGregor
      Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
        doesn't become a monster.                  Friedrich Nietzsche
_______________________________________________
fetchmail-users mailing list
fetchmail-users <at> lists.berlios.de
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fetchmail-users
Matthias Andree | 1 Oct 2009 16:22
Picon
Picon

Re: Fetchmail refuses to deliver some messages

Am 01.10.2009, 12:59 Uhr, schrieb Jerry <gesbbb <at> yahoo.com>:

> This is fetchmail release 6.3.11+RPA+SDPS+SSL+OPIE+NLS.
>
> I have been finding this notation in the fetchmail log file quite
> consistently:
>
> fetchmail: reading message  
> recent:me <at> mydomain.com <at> gmail-pop.l.google.com:1 of 2 (2239 octets) (log  
> message incomplete)
> fetchmail: SMTP error: 501 5.1.7 Bad sender address syntax
> fetchmail:  not flushed
>
> This is the e-mail headers from the problem message:
> Delivered-To: me <at> mydomain.com
> Received: by 10.216.46.134 with SMTP id r6cs313217web;
>         Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: by 10.150.131.5 with SMTP id e5mr1046587ybd.262.1254359047461;
>         Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
> Return-Path: <abfsupajsih <at> ??????>

This looks like there are issues with the DNS or configuration of the  
sender (might be a spammer anyways), and...

> Received: from ?????? ([211.225.33.79])
>         by mx.google.com with ESMTP id  
> 19si23490503gxk.29.2009.09.30.18.04.06;
>         Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
> Received-SPF: softfail (google.com: best guess record for domain of  
> transitioning abfsupajsih <at> \ufffd\ufffd\ufffd\ufffd does not designate  
(Continue reading)

Matthias Andree | 5 Oct 2009 22:11
Picon
Picon

fetchmail 6.3.12 regression/bug fix release available (STABLE)


Greetings,

I am announcing the release of fetchmail 6.3.12.  This new stable
version of fetchmail fixes a crash when 6.3.11 is run on SSL servers
without --verbose mode, and other bugs, and it updates translations.
See below for details.

The software is available from:
<http://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=1824>

The fetchmail home pages are:
<http://www.fetchmail.info/>  or  <http://fetchmail.berlios.de/>

These are the relevant changes in 6.3.12 since the previous release.
Unless otherwise noted, changes to this release were made by Matthias Andree:

# REGRESSION FIXES
* The CVS-2009-2666 fix in fetchmail release 6.3.11 caused a free() of
  unallocated memory on SSL connections, which caused crashes or program aborts
  on some systems (depending on how initialization and free() of unallocated
  memory is handled in compiler and libc).
  Workaround for older versions: run in verbose mode.
  Patch courtesy of Thomas Heinz, fixes Gentoo Bug #280760.
  This regression affected only the 6.3.11 release, but not the patch that was
  part of the security announcement fetchmail-SA-2009-01.

# BUG FIXES
* Fix error reporting for GSSAPI on Heimdal (h5l) Kerberos.
* Look for MD5_Init in libcrypto rather than libssl, fixes Gentoo Kerberos
(Continue reading)

Jess Belliveau | 6 Oct 2009 03:33
Picon

fetchmail - "not flushed" Vs viewed mail/downloaded

Howdy,

Delving in to the deep end of Linux based mail here and having some
problems... want to use Mutt as my mail client to read/send mail from
my POP3 enabled gmail account.

I've installed:
procmail - to handle all the folders etc?
mutt - act as my mail client
fetchmail - provide the interface to gmail

Trying to overcome a fetchmail part - if I run a fetchmail -c it
returns 679 messages - I currently have 1 un-read email awaiting. Am I
missing something - I have changed the google setting to "archive
emails accessed via pop3" and ideally I would just like to be able to
use mutt to read new emails - not concerned about storage of mails (as
they are archived by gmail). Insights????

I have .fetchmailrc/.procmailrc/.muttrc available for viewing if required.

I am thinking it might be related to where my mail files are located....
There seems to be mail at three locations:
- $home/Mail/mutt - created by my procmailrc
- $home/Mail/Spool-Link - a sym link I created to /var/spool/mail/jessb
- /var/mail/jessb - mutt opens here by default....

Cheers,
JB
Matthias Andree | 6 Oct 2009 08:58
Picon
Picon

Re: fetchmail - "not flushed" Vs viewed mail/downloaded

Am 06.10.2009, 03:33 Uhr, schrieb Jess Belliveau  
<jess.belliveau <at> gmail.com>:

> Howdy,
>
> Delving in to the deep end of Linux based mail here and having some
> problems... want to use Mutt as my mail client to read/send mail from
> my POP3 enabled gmail account.
>
> I've installed:
> procmail - to handle all the folders etc?

I suggest maildrop instead. procmail appears unmaintained, does not log  
mail delivery in default settings and has an awkward "if one rule fails to  
deliver, just use the next one" fallthrough error handling unless you  
override this (which is long-winded and makes your .procmailrc awkward to  
read). If you must continue to use procmail, do enable logging so you know  
where procmail stuffs your messages. Check the LOGFILE option.

> mutt - act as my mail client
> fetchmail - provide the interface to gmail
>
> Trying to overcome a fetchmail part - if I run a fetchmail -c it
> returns 679 messages - I currently have 1 un-read email awaiting. Am I
> missing something - I have changed the google setting to "archive
> emails accessed via pop3" and ideally I would just like to be able to
> use mutt to read new emails - not concerned about storage of mails (as
> they are archived by gmail). Insights????

I'm not sure I understand (a) the GMail option and (b) your issue.
(Continue reading)

Chris | 7 Oct 2009 04:27

Re: Server certificate verification error

On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 15:27 +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 14:25, Chris <cpollock <at> embarqmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Sep 27 08:06:01 localhost fetchmail[10036]: Server certificate
> > verification error: certificate signature failure
> > Sep 27 08:06:01 localhost fetchmail[10036]: Issuer Organization:
> > VeriSign, Inc.
> > Sep 27 08:06:01 localhost fetchmail[10036]: Issuer CommonName: VeriSign
> > Class 3 Secure Server CA
> > Sep 27 08:06:01 localhost fetchmail[10036]: Server CommonName:
> > pop.embarqmail.com
> > Sep 27 08:06:01 localhost fetchmail[10036]: pop.embarqmail.com key
> > fingerprint: FE:7E:88:CF:66:C4:27:CD:50:5D:A5:CE:9F:07:DA:EE
> > Sep 27 08:06:01 localhost fetchmail[10036]: Server certificate
> > verification error: certificate has expired
> >
> > On polling my main mail account this morning I noticed this, should
> > embarq be smart enough to know that their certificate has expired or
> > should I notify one of my contacts there?
> 
> Yes and yes ;)  While they should know it's expired, they may not be
> aware yet so informing them is a nice thing to do ;)
> 
Apologies Robb, I'd gotten tied up with other things and forgot to
reply. I've been attempting to contact them various ways since the 28th
and have yet received a reply other than a few of my emails were deleted
without being read :( I've even filled out a contact form at CenturyTel
which Embarq has just merged with. Odd though at domaintools.com I get
this for embarqmail.com:

(Continue reading)

Rob MacGregor | 7 Oct 2009 08:39
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Server certificate verification error

On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 03:27, Chris <cpollock <at> embarqmail.com> wrote:
> Apologies Robb, I'd gotten tied up with other things and forgot to
> reply. I've been attempting to contact them various ways since the 28th
> and have yet received a reply other than a few of my emails were deleted
> without being read :( I've even filled out a contact form at CenturyTel
> which Embarq has just merged with. Odd though at domaintools.com I get
> this for embarqmail.com:
>
> SSL Cert:
> api.embarq.synacor.com expires in 828 days.
>
> and for embarq:
>
> SSL Cert: www.embarq.com
> expires in 272 days.
>
> Which kind of confuses me or am I looking at the wrong type of cert?

You should be checking the certificate for pop.embarq.com ;)

--

-- 
                 Please keep list traffic on the list.

Rob MacGregor
      Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
        doesn't become a monster.                  Friedrich Nietzsche
Chris | 8 Oct 2009 02:41

Re: Server certificate verification error

On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 07:39 +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 03:27, Chris <cpollock <at> embarqmail.com> wrote:
> > Apologies Robb, I'd gotten tied up with other things and forgot to
> > reply. I've been attempting to contact them various ways since the 28th
> > and have yet received a reply other than a few of my emails were deleted
> > without being read :( I've even filled out a contact form at CenturyTel
> > which Embarq has just merged with. Odd though at domaintools.com I get
> > this for embarqmail.com:
> >
> > SSL Cert:
> > api.embarq.synacor.com expires in 828 days.
> >
> > and for embarq:
> >
> > SSL Cert: www.embarq.com
> > expires in 272 days.
> >
> > Which kind of confuses me or am I looking at the wrong type of cert?
> 
> You should be checking the certificate for pop.embarq.com ;)
> 
Rob, can't seem to track anything down about a certificate for
pop.embarq.com nor pop.embarq.synacor.com. Any suggestions?

Chris

--

-- 
KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C

(Continue reading)

Rob MacGregor | 8 Oct 2009 08:14
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Server certificate verification error

On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 01:41, Chris <cpollock <at> embarqmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rob, can't seem to track anything down about a certificate for
> pop.embarq.com nor pop.embarq.synacor.com. Any suggestions?

Try: openssl s_client -connect pop.example.com:995, using the name of
the POP3 server from your .fetchmailrc.

--

-- 
                 Please keep list traffic on the list.

Rob MacGregor
      Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he
        doesn't become a monster.                  Friedrich Nietzsche

Gmane