Peter H. | 14 May 2005 05:45

Not Printing

Sorry wrong alarm. It does print. I kept clicking on "Print postscript content"

Hi,

In exmh-2.7.2 when trying to print I get the following error:

Message generated when printing your message:
lpr: error - unable to print file: client-error-bad-request

In Preferences-Printing the Text print command is: mailp -nobanners $file

It used to work with exmh-2.7.0

The command "mailp -nobanners ~/Mail/inbox/file" works when executed in xterm.

How to resolve?

Thanks & regards
--

-- 
Peter
Peter H. | 14 May 2005 05:40

Not Printing

Hi,

In exmh-2.7.2 when trying to print I get the following error:

Message generated when printing your message:
lpr: error - unable to print file: client-error-bad-request

In Preferences-Printing the Text print command is: mailp -nobanners $file

It used to work with exmh-2.7.0

The command "mailp -nobanners ~/Mail/inbox/file" works when executed in xterm.

How to resolve?

Thanks & regards
--

-- 
Peter
Harlan Feinstein | 19 May 2005 17:58

sorting by other fields

Hey, I was just thinking about sorting my spam folder by the spamassassin 
score before deleting it.  Found one "ham" message already in there; that'd 
make it a little easier to find them (if they're there).

Anyone know how that'd be done, to add another sort method to the menu?  I'm 
running exmh 2.7.2

--Harlan
Tim E. Jedlicka - wrk | 19 May 2005 22:50
Picon
Favicon

Re: sorting by other fields


>>>>> On Thu, 19 May 2005, "Harlan" == Harlan Feinstein wrote:

  Harlan> Hey, I was just thinking about sorting my spam folder by the
  Harlan> spamassassin score before deleting it.  Found one "ham" message
  Harlan> already in there; that'd make it a little easier to find them (if
  Harlan> they're there).

I added the following to my $HOME/.spamassassin/user_prefs

   rewrite_subject 1
   subject_tag *_HITS_* 

I can then sort my spam folder based on subject (Shift-S - but I may have 
setup a private bind - I can't recall). The more ham like messages are at the 
top. Once I get to subjects in the 10 or greater area I can scan a lot faster 
(read sloppier) for any errant ham.
-----
Timothy Jedlicka, bonzo <at> lucent.com, 1-630-713-4436, AOL-IM=tjbonzo
Network Entomologist, Lucent Technologies, LWS NOVE Lab Operations
Owen McShane | 20 May 2005 10:10
X-Face
Picon

Re: sorting by other fields

Hi,

add:

rewrite_header Subject [SA: _HITS_]

to your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs

This will put the spam score on the header.

Then you can just sort by subject

Owen

>Hey, I was just thinking about sorting my spam folder by the spamassassin 
> score before deleting it.  Found one "ham" message already in there; that'd 
> make it a little easier to find them (if they're there).
> 
> Anyone know how that'd be done, to add another sort method to the menu?  I'm 
> running exmh 2.7.2
> 
> --Harlan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Exmh-users mailing list
> Exmh-users <at> redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users
> 

(Continue reading)

Harlan Feinstein | 20 May 2005 17:12

Re: sorting by other fields

  Owen> rewrite_header Subject [SA: _HITS_]

  Owen> to your ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs

  Owen> This will put the spam score on the header.

  Owen> Then you can just sort by subject

You guys rock.  However, this does run afoul of alpha-sorting against a 
numeric field.  Can one change the HITS indication to zero-prefixed somehow?

--Harlan
J C Lawrence | 20 May 2005 17:11
X-Face
Picon
Picon
Picon
Gravatar

Traceback on folder cascade display


I just started getting this when expanding a set of nested folders
(middle click in the folder display area):

  "$fdisp($can) find withtag Ftext=$folder"
      (procedure "FdispGetMap" line 3)
      invoked from within
  "FdispGetMap $can $f"
      (procedure "FdispNotDotDot" line 3)
      invoked from within
  "FdispNotDotDot $can $f"
      (procedure "FdispAllLabels" line 7)
      invoked from within
  "FdispAllLabels $can $f"
      (procedure "FdispHighlightUnseen" line 4)
      invoked from within
  "FdispHighlightUnseen $can $f"
      (procedure "Fdisp_HighlightCanvas" line 13)
      invoked from within
  "Fdisp_HighlightCanvas canvas"
      (procedure "FdispDisplayPopdown" line 238)
      invoked from within
  "FdispDisplayPopdown -Lists- down 107 19"
      (command bound to event)

It doesn't seem to matter which folder.  Ideas?

--
J C Lawrence                        They said, "You have a blue guitar,
---------(*)                        You do not play things as they are."
(Continue reading)

John R. LoVerso | 21 May 2005 02:28
X-Face
Picon

Re: Traceback on folder cascade display

> It doesn't seem to matter which folder.  Ideas?

You didn't say which version of exmh!

What's weird is there's no error, and a canvas 'find withtag' shouldn't
be returning an error anyway:

  "$fdisp($can) find withtag Ftext=$folder"
	(procedure "FdispGetMap" line 3)
	invoked from within
  ...

Did you change the version of Tk recently?

John

(I just realized that I first worked on this code over 10 years ago... wow)
J C Lawrence | 22 May 2005 00:44
X-Face
Picon
Picon
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Traceback on folder cascade display

John R. LoVerso wrote:

>> It doesn't seem to matter which folder.  Ideas?

> You didn't say which version of exmh!

Ahh, thought that was (still) in the message headers.  Guess not.

2.7.2

> What's weird is there's no error, and a canvas 'find withtag' shouldn't
> be returning an error anyway:

Yeah, I've been digging and it _is_ weird.

> Did you change the version of Tk recently?

Only by patchlevel.  I'm running Debian/testing.  Still digging.

--
J C Lawrence                        They said, "You have a blue guitar,
---------(*)                        You do not play things as they are."
claw <at> kanga.nu                       The man replied, "Things as they are
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/          Are changed upon the blue guitar."
J C Lawrence | 22 May 2005 05:40
X-Face
Picon
Picon
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Traceback on folder cascade display

J C Lawrence wrote:
> John R. LoVerso wrote:

>>> It doesn't seem to matter which folder.  Ideas?

>> You didn't say which version of exmh!

> Ahh, thought that was (still) in the message headers.  Guess not.

> 2.7.2

I appear to have found the problem:

  I had a folder path which included an exclamation point as part of one
  of the path elements.

One result was that flist would fail at that point and not scan any
subsequent folders, as well as the traceback I posted earlier.

--
J C Lawrence                        They said, "You have a blue guitar,
---------(*)                        You do not play things as they are."
claw <at> kanga.nu                       The man replied, "Things as they are
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/          Are changed upon the blue guitar."

Gmane