Wakko Warner | 1 Dec 2004 02:14

Re: Headers

> closer,
> 
> Remove_Headers = Subject:
> headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
>                          Subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
>                         
> Gives me [] subjecttext  
> I need to get rid of []  now

Please don't top post.

Got the ordering wrong.  Try this:
${sg{$h_subject:}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}

Here's the test I did with exim -be:
${sg{[SPAM] random subject}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
returns: "random subject" (no quotes)

> wakko <at> animx.eu.org wrote:
> >JAS wrote:
> >>I am trying to remove the word spam from a subject line this is what I 
> >>tried.
> >>headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
> >>                         new-subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
> >>                          Subject: $h_new-subject:"
> >>I get
> >>router failed to expand "X-Filter: $primary_hostname \nnew-subject: 
> >>${sg{[SPAM]}{$h_subject}} \nSubject: $h_new-subject:" missing or 
> >>misplaced { or }
> >>does anyone have experience with this that works and  would like to 
(Continue reading)

JAS | 1 Dec 2004 02:31

Re: Headers


wakko <at> animx.eu.org wrote:

>>closer,
>>
>>Remove_Headers = Subject:
>>headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
>>                         Subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
>>                        
>>Gives me [] subjecttext  
>>I need to get rid of []  now
>>    
>>
>
>Please don't top post.
>
>Got the ordering wrong.  Try this:
>${sg{$h_subject:}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>
>Here's the test I did with exim -be:
>${sg{[SPAM] random subject}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>returns: "random subject" (no quotes)
>
>  
>
OK, I tried the same and got the same, but for reason in the conf file 
when I do this I get [SPAM]  without the \N 's I just get []  I am baffled.
I even tied octal codes, \133 \135  haha it laughed at me....[] Will 
keep checking.....thanks

(Continue reading)

Dan Shoop | 1 Dec 2004 03:38

Sender Callout Verification on non-default NI

I have a multihomed network (Cable/HFC from OptimumOnline, DSL from 
Verizon) with a default route through OptimumOnline which has stopped 
passing port 25 traffic. These are NAT'ed LAN networks 192.168.1.0/24 
and 10.123.119.0/24 respectively, with 192.168.1.0/24 as the default 
route/network. I'm using DynDNS's MailHop service to act as primary 
MX which then resends on a high order port to my local exim which is 
listening on 192.168.1.20. Outgoing mail smarthosts through my ISP 
already.

I want to teach exim to do Sender Callout Verification through the NI 
that attaches to the DSL network by the IP address 10.123.119.19 and 
does permit port 25 traffic. It would seem as if the "interface" 
qualifier should be useful here.

I have the following RCPT ACL:

warn  !verify          = sender/callout
       domains          = !+noverify_domains
       message          = X-Exim-Sender-Verify: failed - $acl_verify_message
       log_message      = sender verify failed: $acl_verify_message

I tried creating the following router and transports:

this_router_verifies_addresses:
   driver       = dnslookup
   domains      = !+local_domains
   transport    = verify_smtp
   verify_only

verify_smtp:
(Continue reading)

JAS | 1 Dec 2004 03:32

Re: Headers


wakko <at> animx.eu.org wrote:

>>closer,
>>
>>Remove_Headers = Subject:
>>headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
>>                         Subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
>>                        
>>Gives me [] subjecttext  
>>I need to get rid of []  now
>>    
>>
>
>Please don't top post.
>
>Got the ordering wrong.  Try this:
>${sg{$h_subject:}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>
>Here's the test I did with exim -be:
>${sg{[SPAM] random subject}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>returns: "random subject" (no quotes)
>  
>
I even tried when it makes its second pass,   so I did an sg on []
as follow

${sg{h_subject}{\N\[\] *\N}{}}
I get this error

(Continue reading)

JAS | 1 Dec 2004 05:26

Re: Headers


jas2803 <at> netscape.net wrote:

>
>
> wakko <at> animx.eu.org wrote:
>
>>> closer,
>>>
>>> Remove_Headers = Subject:
>>> headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
>>>                         Subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
>>>                        Gives me [] subjecttext  I need to get rid of 
>>> []  now
>>>   
>>
>>
>> Please don't top post.
>>
>> Got the ordering wrong.  Try this:
>> ${sg{$h_subject:}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>>
>> Here's the test I did with exim -be:
>> ${sg{[SPAM] random subject}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>> returns: "random subject" (no quotes)
>>  
>>
> I even tried when it makes its second pass,   so I did an sg on []
> as follow
>
(Continue reading)

JAS | 1 Dec 2004 05:42

Re: Headers


jas2803 <at> netscape.net wrote:

>
>
> jas2803 <at> netscape.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> wakko <at> animx.eu.org wrote:
>>
>>>> closer,
>>>>
>>>> Remove_Headers = Subject:
>>>> headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
>>>>                         Subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
>>>>                        Gives me [] subjecttext  I need to get rid 
>>>> of []  now
>>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Please don't top post.
>>>
>>> Got the ordering wrong.  Try this:
>>> ${sg{$h_subject:}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>>>
>>> Here's the test I did with exim -be:
>>> ${sg{[SPAM] random subject}{\N\[SPAM\] *\N}{}}
>>> returns: "random subject" (no quotes)
(Continue reading)

Subhi S Hashwa | 1 Dec 2004 05:58

Re: exim module for webmin?

Thursday, October 28, 2004, 5:08:45 AM, sam wun wrote:

> Hi,

> Is there a Exim module for webmin? I only manage to find an Exim 
> monitoring module.

not that I found, but google for vexim if web management is the kind of thing you're
looking for.

-- 
Best regards,
 Subhi S Hashwa                            mailto:lists <at> subhi.com
 When everything is heading your way, you're in the wrong lane.

--

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##

JAS | 1 Dec 2004 06:14

Re: Headers


jas2803 <at> netscape.net wrote:

>
>
> jas2803 <at> netscape.net wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> jas2803 <at> netscape.net wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> wakko <at> animx.eu.org wrote:
>>>
>>>>> closer,
>>>>>
>>>>> Remove_Headers = Subject:
>>>>> headers_add = "X-Filter: $primary_hostname   \n\
>>>>>                         Subject: ${sg{\[SPAM\]}{h_subject:}} \n\
>>>>>                        Gives me [] subjecttext  I need to get rid 
>>>>> of []  now
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please don't top post.
>>>>
>>>> Got the ordering wrong.  Try this:
(Continue reading)

Dan Jacobson | 1 Dec 2004 01:56
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: to smarthost via port 587

D> Take a look at the 'port' option
OK. Will try. I note that machine names and their port numbers are
thus not kept together in the file.  Inconvenient when wanting to
switch from machine A on port X to machine B on port Y.

--

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##

JAS | 1 Dec 2004 07:10

Re: Headers

OK, it appear that for some reason it is the leading [ that is the 
culprit.  I can get rid of SPAM]  i can get rid of  ] but for the life 
me I cannot get rid of the first ine [
I have tried every combination I can think of....nothing .

--

-- 
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/ ##


Gmane