Has anyone got web alpine to work with lighttpd? All I get is the directory listing of /var/www/alpine, i.e. of /usr/local/libexec/alpine/cgi. Do I need to include 'index.tcl' in lighttpd's list of index file names? Best regards, -- -- No no no, my fish's name is Eric, Eric the fish. He's an halibut. I am not a looney! Why should I be tarred with the epithet looney merely because I have a pet halibut?
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Steven Nikkel wrote: > I tried to build Alpine 2.00 on Freebsd 4.11 and get some errors: FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x are past their End of Life dates, well past it for version 4. You should seriously consider upgrading to FreeBSD 7, or at least 6. The FreeBSD ports tree has Alpine 2.00 in it now, you may be able to update your ports tree and use that as a guide, but no guarantees. Good luck, Doug -- -- This .signature sanit
Can anyone more familiar with the code see a way to quickly add the "re-open the closed connection" functionality to the newmail check? or to whatever gets run when ^L is pressed? I've started using Alpine with Gmail (for domains), but only for composing mail. So, I leave Alpine up in the background, and the connection closes on some error or another. (Usually due to a wireless network dropping out.) Then I'm left in the INBOX(CLOSED) state, and have to jump up to "incoming folders" (or some other list of folders) and go back into the original folder. Gmail's IMAP LIST apparently isn't the quickest thing in the world, so it'd be nice to avoid having to go back up in the hierarchy. (Not that it's that slow... and I've probably just spent ten times as much time composing this as I'll save... but still.) Best, Ben
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > :) > Did someone make any changes in the "ROLES" code? I have not found > :) > any info in changelog. > :) > :) No changes that I can think of and I can't reproduce the problem. > > I think this is a problem with a patch integration that I have. I made a > mistake in one of the patches (called "integrate", which most people don't > see, but I use to integrate all patches because of failures of applying > patches). In alpine/reply.c replace ps_global->reply.role_chosen by > !ps_global->reply.role_chosen, and that should fix the problem. > > I'm sorry for the inconvenience. I already made this change in all.patch. There is still a problem. A want to reply to a mail: I select "#", then select reply and a role. Now after I selected the role, the default role selection overwrites this selection again. I see this for the roles, which required confirmation, as I get asked then. Very annoying. Ciao -- -- http://www.dstoecker.eu/ (PGP key available)(Continue reading)
Hi! I recently started using a role. I have a personal email address (the one i'm writing from) and a work email address (tom.anderson@...) which forwards to it. I have a role set up for work email, which sets my From header and signature accordingly. I want the role to trigger automatically for work email. The basic case is easy enough: i have a Recip pattern which recognises <at> e2x.co.uk. That matches if someone sends or cc's an email to my work address, and means replies to such emails go from my work role. It doesn't work for mails from mailing lists, or at least not Sourceforge ones. The problem is that such emails don't have me in the To header - the key headers look like this: From: "Some Guy" <someguy@...> To: htmlunit-user@... Reply-To: htmlunit-user@... Sender: htmlunit-user-bounces@... No mention of the address to which the mailing list is sending the message! Most of the other headers that mention a recipient are set after the forwarding step, so they have my personal address in. The one hope is this one:(Continue reading)
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Eduardo Chappa wrote: > On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Dirk Stöcker wrote: > > :) There is still a problem. > :) > :) A want to reply to a mail: > :) > :) I select "#", then select reply and a role. > :) > :) Now after I selected the role, the default role selection overwrites > :) this selection again. I see this for the roles, which required > :) confirmation, as I get asked then. > > Dear Dirk, > > I am trying to understand your problem by reproducing it, and I would > like to understand what your expectations are. Could you send me a copy of > the roles you are having problems with and a step by step instruction on > how to reproduce the problem? What I've tried over here has the same > behavior in patched and unpatched source, so I must be doing something I > should not. Maybe the behavior depends on something you configured that I > did not. When you press '#' you can select a role to use e.g. for replying. Worked fine in 1.10. Now in 2.00 this role is changed afterwards to the default role, which makes it impossible to use the '#' key and thus to select a role, which is not automatically applied. I have about 15 roles, so that is really important for me.(Continue reading)
Hi Tom, On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Tom Anderson wrote: > From: "Some Guy" <someguy@...> > To: htmlunit-user@... > Reply-To: htmlunit-user@... > Sender: htmlunit-user-bounces@... > > No mention of the address to which the mailing list is sending the message! *** this is a little problem. I do not forward messages from my different mailboxes and I have two Roles - on for my email as recipient and the second for emails in specific Folder. E.g. for alpine-info mail list, I have one Role with my email as recipient, but then I have other role for Emails in IMAP Folder (without recipient). If my email is not in recipients in the specific folder, then role for folder is used. > Anyway, i duly created an 'extra header' rule to recognise that one. So now my > rules look like this: > > Recip pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk > X-Rcpt-To pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk *** In your case, this means if the recipient contains <at> e2x.co.uk !!AND!! X-Rcpt-To contains <at> e2x.co.uk. IMHO you should make two Roles. One role with Recip pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk and the second role with X-Rcpt-To pattern =(Continue reading)
On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Robert Wolf wrote: > On Wed, 3 Sep 2008, Tom Anderson wrote: > >> Anyway, i duly created an 'extra header' rule to recognise that one. So now my >> rules look like this: >> >> Recip pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk >> X-Rcpt-To pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk > > *** In your case, this means if the recipient contains <at> e2x.co.uk !!AND!! > X-Rcpt-To contains <at> e2x.co.uk. A-HA! That explains everything. Thanks! > IMHO you should make two Roles. One role with Recip pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk > and the second role with X-Rcpt-To pattern = <at> e2x.co.uk. To do it easy, > make the first role and then use "R" to replicate role and change the > required conditions (delete recip pattern and create x-rcpt-to pattern). That sounds like a good plan. It would be nice if there was a way to have a logical-or based set of rules, or to have a role which is an alias for another, but in the absence of that, that seems like the best thing to do. Thanks again, tom -- --(Continue reading)
Alpine 2.00 built from FreeBSD ports. Okay, so tech-notes.txt has messages about configuration of S/MIME variables, but I'm not finding them in setup-->config, and for supported options I'm seeing the below. Is there another patch that needs to be applied? -Dan Encryption: TLS and SSL Authenticators: EXTERNAL CRAM-MD5 PLAIN LOGIN Mailbox drivers: mbox md mc imap nntp pop3 mix mx mbx tenex(Continue reading)
RSS Feed12 | |
|---|---|
21 | |
23 | |
8 | |
32 | |
13 | |
34 | |
18 | |
13 | |
17 | |
21 | |
32 | |
19 | |
45 | |
28 | |
48 | |
63 | |
11 | |
118 | |
82 | |
61 | |
43 | |
52 | |
16 | |
49 | |
60 | |
95 | |
20 | |
103 | |
33 | |
12 | |
66 | |
72 | |
104 | |
126 | |
49 | |
93 | |
83 | |
72 | |
32 | |
143 | |
147 | |
48 | |
72 | |
107 | |
82 | |
111 | |
109 | |
101 | |
56 | |
272 | |
152 | |
89 | |
107 | |
95 | |
78 | |
86 | |
108 | |
123 | |
108 | |
209 | |
73 | |
183 | |
133 | |
183 | |
7 |
