Hi guys, I am looking for a clean, simple VM and bytecode for new language development and was wondering if there was a documentation / commented source code out there somewhere that would allow me to get a feel for Scheme 48's VM architecture and bytecode language? Thanks in advance for any pointers your can provide, Benoit de Boursetty
BdB <bdbkun <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I am looking for a clean, simple VM and bytecode for new language
> development and was wondering if there was a documentation / commented
> source code out there somewhere that would allow me to get a feel for Scheme
> 48's VM architecture and bytecode language?
The paper to check out would be:
<at> Article{KelseyRees1995,
author = "Richard A. Kelsey and Jonathan A. Rees",
title = "A Tractable {Scheme} Implementation",
journal = "Lisp and Symbolic Computation",
year = 1995,
volume = 7,
number = 4,
pages = "315--335",
index = 105
}
The source code for the VM sits in scheme/vm. There have been some
changes since the publication of the paper. I don't know if it's
adequately, but we'll be happy to answer questions.
--
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
(Continue reading)Does anyone know the current state of affairs with regard to a JIT compiler for Scheme 48? Googling for ``scheme 48'' and ``JIT'' gives a few hits implying there's some work-in-progress in this direction, but mostly in the form of (years) old logs from #scheme. I'm brain storming some ideas for a senior project, and wanted to check if I'd be stepping on anyone's toes with this. (Of course, I'd also be interested in other Scheme 48-related, semester-long projects in need of work.) Thanks.
"Matthew R. Dempsky" <mrd <at> alkemio.org> writes: > Does anyone know the current state of affairs with regard to a JIT > compiler for Scheme 48? Googling for ``scheme 48'' and ``JIT'' gives > a few hits implying there's some work-in-progress in this direction, > but mostly in the form of (years) old logs from #scheme. It's still work in progress (and some progress is happening right now), but I'd say that it's too substantially completed to be a suitable subject for a senior project. (Martin G. might have more to say on the matter.) > I'm brain storming some ideas for a senior project, and wanted to > check if I'd be stepping on anyone's toes with this. (Of course, I'd > also be interested in other Scheme 48-related, semester-long projects > in need of work.) High on my personal list are a new FFI and .NET interopability. FWIW, I'd be happy to advise on either. -- -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
Michael Sperber <sperber <at> informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: >> I'm brain storming some ideas for a senior project, and wanted to >> check if I'd be stepping on anyone's toes with this. (Of course, I'd >> also be interested in other Scheme 48-related, semester-long projects >> in need of work.) > > High on my personal list are a new FFI and .NET interopability. FWIW, > I'd be happy to advise on either. > Can you elaborate a bit? I'm also looking for a project (assuming I'll find a group which wants to work on s48). Cheers, Rotty -- -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty <at> ICQ | 118634484 <at> ICQ | a.rottmann <at> gmx.at http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | C38A 39C5 16D7 B69F 33A3 6993 22C8 27F7 35A9 92E7 v2sw7MYChw5pr5OFma7u7Lw2m5g/l7Di6e6t5BSb7en6g3/5HZa2Xs6MSr1/2p7 hackerkey.com Python is executable pseudocode, Perl is executable line-noise.
Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann <at> gmx.at> writes: > Michael Sperber <sperber <at> informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: > >>> I'm brain storming some ideas for a senior project, and wanted to >>> check if I'd be stepping on anyone's toes with this. (Of course, I'd >>> also be interested in other Scheme 48-related, semester-long projects >>> in need of work.) >> >> High on my personal list are a new FFI and .NET interopability. FWIW, >> I'd be happy to advise on either. >> > Can you elaborate a bit? I'm also looking for a project (assuming I'll > find a group which wants to work on s48). We need an FFI on top of the one we have the implements a JNI-like model (with explicit allocation and deallocation of proxy objects to Scheme objects). The .NET integration would, I think, essentially be analogous to the dot-scheme stuff. The tricky bit is dealing with the event loop. -- -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla
"Matthew R. Dempsky" <mrd <at> alkemio.org> writes: > I'm brain storming some ideas for a senior project, and wanted to > check if I'd be stepping on anyone's toes with this. (Of course, I'd > also be interested in other Scheme 48-related, semester-long projects > in need of work.) I think writing GUI bindings for S48 is also an interesting project. We already started with bindings for Qt and Cocoa but both still require a substantial amount of work before they are ready for a release. We can give you the existing code and tell you what's missing. -- -- Martin
Martin Gasbichler <gasbichl <at> informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes: > "Matthew R. Dempsky" <mrd <at> alkemio.org> writes: > >> I'm brain storming some ideas for a senior project, and wanted to >> check if I'd be stepping on anyone's toes with this. (Of course, I'd >> also be interested in other Scheme 48-related, semester-long projects >> in need of work.) > > I think writing GUI bindings for S48 is also an interesting > project. We already started with bindings for Qt and Cocoa but both > still require a substantial amount of work before they are ready for a > release. We can give you the existing code and tell you what's > missing. > I have started on GTK+ bindings; the code for Qt and Cocoa would sure be helpful for advancing the bindings (e.g. to see how the eventloop problem is solved). Regards, Rotty -- -- Andreas Rottmann | Rotty <at> ICQ | 118634484 <at> ICQ | a.rottmann <at> gmx.at http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | C38A 39C5 16D7 B69F 33A3 6993 22C8 27F7 35A9 92E7 v2sw7MYChw5pr5OFma7u7Lw2m5g/l7Di6e6t5BSb7en6g3/5HZa2Xs6MSr1/2p7 hackerkey.com I have a truly elegant proof of the above, but it is too long to fit into this .signature file.(Continue reading)
On Wed 11 Oct 2006 12:59, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann <at> gmx.at> writes: > I have started on GTK+ bindings; the code for Qt and Cocoa would sure > be helpful for advancing the bindings (e.g. to see how the eventloop > problem is solved). There is a darcs repository with the Qt and Cocoa code at the following address: http://www-pu.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/users/knauel/sw/scheme48-gui/ -Eric -- -- "Excuse me --- Di Du Du Duuuuh Di Dii --- Huh Weeeheeee" (Albert King)
On Oct 13, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Eric Knauel wrote: > > On Wed 11 Oct 2006 12:59, Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann <at> gmx.at> writes: > >> I have started on GTK+ bindings; the code for Qt and Cocoa would sure >> be helpful for advancing the bindings (e.g. to see how the eventloop >> problem is solved). > > There is a darcs repository with the Qt and Cocoa code at the > following address: > > http://www-pu.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/users/knauel/sw/scheme48-gui/ Examining the README file and the INSTALL file, am I reading them correctly, that this is Scheme48 version 1.1? I don't really know all that happened between versions 1.1 and 1.3, but isn't a GUI setup that is tied to an old version of Scheme48 rather limited in complete usefulness? -- -- Aaron Hsu ~ misc <at> sacrificumdeo.net
RSS Feed8 | |
|---|---|
3 | |
1 | |
7 | |
6 | |
11 | |
10 | |
8 | |
1 | |
11 | |
4 | |
2 | |
30 | |
9 | |
1 | |
9 | |
5 | |
16 | |
3 | |
4 | |
2 | |
12 | |
6 | |
1 | |
19 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
1 | |
6 | |
4 | |
4 | |
7 | |
28 | |
9 | |
10 | |
9 | |
25 | |
12 | |
9 | |
10 | |
4 | |
28 | |
3 | |
4 | |
7 | |
11 | |
19 | |
6 | |
21 | |
17 | |
12 | |
12 | |
38 | |
18 | |
40 | |
14 | |
10 | |
3 | |
1 | |
16 | |
12 | |
7 | |
12 | |
4 | |
10 | |
11 | |
11 | |
18 | |
6 | |
20 | |
23 | |
13 | |
29 | |
35 | |
34 | |
18 | |
7 | |
16 | |
23 | |
7 | |
7 | |
18 | |
29 | |
17 | |
8 | |
37 | |
35 | |
30 | |
29 | |
31 | |
11 | |
11 | |
23 | |
17 | |
12 | |
8 | |
19 | |
24 | |
4 | |
6 | |
2 | |
6 | |
9 | |
1 | |
1 | |
7 | |
2 | |
2 | |
2 | |
7 | |
1 | |
2 | |
4 | |
6 | |
3 | |
9 | |
3 | |
8 | |
3 | |
8 | |
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
9 | |
18 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
8 | |
1 | |
4 | |
4 | |
7 | |
6 | |
22 | |
5 | |
3 | |
1 | |
2 | |
2 | |
6 | |
14 | |
4 | |
2 | |
5 | |
7 | |
2 | |
3 | |
21 | |
6 | |
9 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
22 | |
13 | |
3 | |
5 | |
6 | |
1 | |
12 | |
9 | |
1 | |
1 | |
4 | |
5 | |
4 | |
9 | |
6 | |
25 | |
15 | |
18 | |
1 | |
1 | |
6 | |
2 | |
23 | |
3 | |
8 | |
2 | |
3 | |
8 | |
8 | |
5 | |
13 | |
26 | |
29 | |
26 | |
12 | |
21 | |
34 | |
48 | |
16 | |
21 | |
18 | |
27 | |
26 | |
6 | |
6 | |
3 | |
1 | |
2 | |
8 | |
3 | |
2 | |
6 | |
1 | |
4 |
