Jonathan A Rees | 24 Jul 1999 03:35
Favicon

small problem with call-with-mumble-pipes

File scheme/misc/packages.scm needs to specify that structure
ENUMERATED is to be opened by structure CALL-WITH-MUMBLE-PIPES.
Jonathan

    Welcome to Scheme 48 0.52 (made by jar on Sun Oct 18 19:17:49 EDT 1998).
    ...

    > ,config ,load =scheme48/misc/packages.scm
    /usr/local/lib/scheme48/misc/packages.scm
    > ,open call-with-mumble-pipes
    Load structure call-with-mumble-pipes (y/n)? y
    [call-with-mumble-pipes /usr/local/lib/scheme48/misc/pipe.scm
    Warning: invalid variable reference
	     enum

    Warning: invalid variable reference
	     enum

    Undefined: (raw-input-channel open-channel-option raw-output-channel input-channel-≥port output-channel-≥port)
    ]
    > 

Jonathan A Rees | 24 Jul 1999 03:48
Favicon

not so small problem with call-with-mumble-pipes

Actually, it looks like this package got left behind across the I/O
system rationalizations... the OPEN-CHANNEL-OPTION enumeration doesn't
even exist any more.

I guess the misc/ directory is unmaintained or deprecated?  Perhaps we
should flush it, or at least annotate the source code with the version
number of the last Scheme 48 version in which it ran.

Jonathan

Richard Kelsey | 26 Jul 1999 18:10
Picon

Re: not so small problem with call-with-mumble-pipes


   Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 21:48:19 -0400
   From: Jonathan A Rees <jar1 <at> mumble.net>

   Actually, it looks like this package got left behind across the I/O
   system rationalizations... the OPEN-CHANNEL-OPTION enumeration doesn't
   even exist any more.

Yes.

   I guess the misc/ directory is unmaintained or deprecated?  Perhaps we
   should flush it, or at least annotate the source code with the version
   number of the last Scheme 48 version in which it ran.

Unmaintained but not yet deprecated.  We should either flush it
or document it and have `make check' verify that it still works.

Send me some documentation and test code for call-with-mumble-pipes;
I can tell that it won't work, but not what it would do if it did.

                                         -Richard


Gmane