Re: ANN: Lush 2.0 beta release
Yann LeCun <yann <at> cs.nyu.edu>
2009-10-19 15:45:05 GMT
Great! I'm glad that's cleared up.
On Monday 19 October 2009, Raymond Martin wrote:
> > We actually got persmission from all the people we could think of.
> > We think a lot more people would use Lush in industrial contexts
> > if we switched to the LGPL.
> > We knew you contributed to the documentation, which is really not
> > affected by the license, but I guess we overlooked your contributions
> > to the code.
> > Would you give your permission for the switch, as far as your
> > contributions are concerned? If not, we will just take out your
> > contributions, but that would be a shame.
> I have no problem with giving permission. Although, it would have been an
> idea to post this proposed change in a transparent manner on the list, I
> believe. Unfortunately I think it is impossible to convert from GPL to LGPL
> without full permission of all parties that ever contributed. GPL is sort
> of a one-way license on this.
> FYI, all the documentation was under GPL, there was no other license.
> So that too has been converted to LGPL in this case.