clisp-cvs-request | 1 Dec 2008 13:08
Picon

clisp-cvs Digest, Vol 32, Issue 1

Send clisp-cvs mailing list submissions to
	clisp-cvs <at> lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-cvs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	clisp-cvs-request <at> lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	clisp-cvs-owner <at> lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of clisp-cvs digest..."

CLISP CVS commits for today

Today's Topics:

   1. clisp/src zthread.d,1.28,1.29 (Sam Steingold)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:01:14 +0000
From: Sam Steingold <sds <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Subject: clisp/src zthread.d,1.28,1.29
To: clisp-cvs <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Message-ID: <E1L6ojS-0001m6-Q8 <at> ddv4jf1.ch3.sourceforge.com>

Update of /cvsroot/clisp/clisp/src
(Continue reading)

Sam Steingold | 1 Dec 2008 17:21
Picon

Re: Clisp new-clx and McCLIM

please take a look at the cvs head
thanks

Philippe Brochard | 1 Dec 2008 22:00
Picon
Favicon

Re: Clisp new-clx and McCLIM

Sam Steingold writes:

> please take a look at the cvs head
> thanks
> 
Works perfectly! And thanks for the keysym exploration. Things are
less approximate now. Maybe I find the hexadecimal notation more
expressive but it's just a matter of taste.

clisp-cvs-request | 1 Dec 2008 23:16
Picon

clisp-cvs Digest, Vol 32, Issue 2

Send clisp-cvs mailing list submissions to
	clisp-cvs <at> lists.sourceforge.net

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clisp-cvs
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	clisp-cvs-request <at> lists.sourceforge.net

You can reach the person managing the list at
	clisp-cvs-owner <at> lists.sourceforge.net

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of clisp-cvs digest..."

CLISP CVS commits for today

Today's Topics:

   1. clisp/src ChangeLog, 1.6669, 1.6670 charstrg.d, 1.143,	1.144
      constobj.d, 1.206, 1.207 (Sam Steingold)
   2. clisp/src ChangeLog,1.6670,1.6671 (Sam Steingold)
   3. clisp/modules/clx/new-clx clx.f,2.162,2.163 (Sam Steingold)
   4. clisp/modules/clx/new-clx clx.f,2.163,2.164 (Sam Steingold)
   5. clisp/modules/clx/new-clx test.tst,1.57,1.58 (Sam Steingold)
   6. clisp/tests ChangeLog,1.603,1.604 tests.lisp,1.102,1.103
      (Sam Steingold)
   7. clisp/tests ChangeLog,1.604,1.605 tests.lisp,1.103,1.104
      (Sam Steingold)
   8. clisp/modules/clx/new-clx clx.f,2.164,2.165 (Sam Steingold)

(Continue reading)

Sam Steingold | 1 Dec 2008 23:39
Picon

Re: Clisp new-clx and McCLIM

Philippe Brochard wrote:
> Sam Steingold writes:
>> please take a look at the cvs head
>>
> Works perfectly! And thanks for the keysym exploration. Things are

so, can new-clx run mcclim now?
you said that a small change to mcclim was necessary - did they make the change?

> less approximate now. Maybe I find the hexadecimal notation more
> expressive but it's just a matter of taste.

ok, I switched to hex.

Sam Steingold | 2 Dec 2008 19:12
Picon

new-clx TODO

Philippe Brochard wrote:
> I've been able to run most of the McCLIM applications and my own
> CLIM application with clisp/new-clx.

Good.

There are a couple of things that need to be done on new-clx, specifically, two 
demos are broken: greynetic & bball. could you please take a look at them?

Thanks.

Philippe Brochard | 2 Dec 2008 22:06
Picon
Favicon

Re: new-clx TODO

Sam Steingold writes:

> Philippe Brochard wrote:
> > I've been able to run most of the McCLIM applications and my own
> > CLIM application with clisp/new-clx.
> 
> Good.
> 
> There are a couple of things that need to be done on new-clx,
> specifically, two demos are broken: greynetic & bball. could you
> please take a look at them?
> 
Sure. The problem comes from the screen deph. Here is a fix:

Index: modules/clx/new-clx/demos/bball.lisp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/clisp/clisp/modules/clx/new-clx/demos/bball.lisp,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -w -p -r1.5 bball.lisp
--- modules/clx/new-clx/demos/bball.lisp	25 Jun 2008 23:05:28 -0000	1.5
+++ modules/clx/new-clx/demos/bball.lisp	2 Dec 2008 21:02:40 -0000
 <at>  <at>  -111,7 +111,8  <at>  <at> 
                                            :exposures :off))
            (bounce-pixmap (xlib:create-pixmap
                            :width +bball-size-x+ :height +bball-size-y+
-                           :depth 1 :drawable window))
+                           :depth (xlib:screen-root-depth screen)
+			   :drawable window))
            (pixmap-gc (xlib:create-gcontext :drawable bounce-pixmap
                                             :foreground white-pixel
(Continue reading)

Philippe Brochard | 2 Dec 2008 22:12
Picon
Favicon

Re: Clisp new-clx and McCLIM

Sam Steingold writes:

> Philippe Brochard wrote:
> > Sam Steingold writes:
> >> please take a look at the cvs head
> >>
> > Works perfectly! And thanks for the keysym exploration. Things are
> 
> so, can new-clx run mcclim now?
>
Yes, but I have no reply for my change on the McCLIM mailing list.

> you said that a small change to mcclim was necessary - did they make the change?
> 
No, not yet.

A question: did new-clx must have the same behaviour than mit-clx?
Because here, in McCLIM, they doesn't do the same thing with the same
code.

Sam Steingold | 3 Dec 2008 00:18
Picon

Re: new-clx TODO

Philippe Brochard wrote:
> Sam Steingold writes:
> 
>> There are a couple of things that need to be done on new-clx,
>> specifically, two demos are broken: greynetic & bball. could you
>> please take a look at them?
>>
> Sure. The problem comes from the screen deph. Here is a fix:

that was fast.
very impressive.
thanks!

would you like to work on the gtk2 module?
it would be nice to finally finish the gui.

Sam Steingold | 3 Dec 2008 00:19
Picon

Re: Clisp new-clx and McCLIM

Philippe Brochard wrote:
> 
> A question: did new-clx must have the same behaviour than mit-clx?

yes, it would be nice if that were true.

> Because here, in McCLIM, they doesn't do the same thing with the same
> code.

can you isolate and debug this discrepancy?


Gmane