Bart Botta | 13 Mar 2010 23:21
Picon

OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings

I've updated the low level bindings (%gl package) in my cl-opengl fork
at http://github.com/3b/cl-opengl to version 60 of the .spec files,
including gl 3.3 and gl 4.0.
Only minimally tested, but shouldn't have any effect on existing code
aside from a few extension functions whose names changed
(named-make-buffer-resident-nv and named-make-buffer-non-resident-nv
are make-named-* now), an OpenGLES-only enum name change
(:writeonly-rendering-amd to :writeonly-rendering-qcom), and the
disappearance of framebuffer-texture-face, but that doesn't seem to be
in the specification either.

see http://github.com/3b/cl-opengl/issues for a list of known issues,
feel free to add more if you run into any problems with it.

--
b
Luís Oliveira | 14 Mar 2010 01:28
Picon
Gravatar

Re: OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Bart Botta <00003b <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> I've updated the low level bindings (%gl package) in my cl-opengl fork

Any reason why we shouldn't make this the official branch and adjust
the webpage links? (And should we point to the issue tracker as well?)

--

-- 
Luís Oliveira
http://r42.eu/~luis/
Ole Arndt | 14 Mar 2010 11:36
Face

Re: OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings

Luís Oliveira <luismbo <at> gmail.com> writes:

> On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:21 PM, Bart Botta <00003b <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've updated the low level bindings (%gl package) in my cl-opengl fork
>
> Any reason why we shouldn't make this the official branch and adjust
> the webpage links? (And should we point to the issue tracker as well?)

Not that I have any say in this, but I would welcome it. I am using the
fork since quite some time without issues.

Ole
--

-- 
Ole Arndt                     http://www.sugarshark.com

_______________________________________________
cl-opengl-devel mailing list
cl-opengl-devel <at> common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
Bart Botta | 14 Mar 2010 20:44
Picon

Re: OpenGL 3.3/4.0 bindings

On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Luís Oliveira <luismbo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Any reason why we shouldn't make this the official branch and adjust
> the webpage links? (And should we point to the issue tracker as well?)
>

OK with me, though if people actually started using the issue tracker
very much, I'd probably want to move it somewhere better.

I think the only major regression from the darcs tree is that the auto
error checking breaks rather badly when used with multiple contexts,
but at least that isn't too hard to disable, and seems useful
otherwise.

--
b

_______________________________________________
cl-opengl-devel mailing list
cl-opengl-devel <at> common-lisp.net
http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel

Gmane