6 May 2008 15:22
7 May 2008 08:25
Not a test -- don't ignore (Hi, Marco!)
Ken Tilton <kennytilton <at> optonline.net>
2008-05-07 06:25:06 GMT
2008-05-07 06:25:06 GMT
I just added a simplistic new namespace mechanism to Cells that probably will need refinement, but will certainly work for its simplistic design goals: If your sougth (formerly by fm-other) stuff will Just Be There during a datapulse, and be named uniquely and absolutely (no path relative stuff where two things have the same name but are differentiated by being nearer (in some sense) to the seeker) then you can just look them up by name. This arose because I got into a cycle seeking X from Y. I quickly saw that Cells could trivially support "if this cycles return X (in this case nil works)" -- and tho I did not go for it for this time I expect Cells to go there soon -- but then next I saw the problem only arose because I had gotten lazy and structured things unusually such that a namespace search had gone so high..well, it's complicated, but I saw that unlazying my code would probably eliminate the cycle, but one Design Principle of Cells is "Hey, this is supposed to make programming easier, that does not happen if I have to sweat these things I would naturally code." and I have been regularly solving these things by unlazying my code but damnit Lisp is all about being lazy so I thought let's see if there is something still sensible that lets me keep my lazy structuring. And of course the bizarritude of fm-other and its ilk begged to be challenged, because they blindly sail all over the hierarchy looking for things and this invites cycles because rules determing the populations of models may well kick off these searches -- hello cycle! And that was what was happening here so if I could find things without blindly traversing the hierarchy life would be good.(Continue reading)
9 May 2008 00:07
openair project created
Andy Chambers <achambers.home <at> googlemail.com>
2008-05-08 22:07:40 GMT
2008-05-08 22:07:40 GMT
Hi Everyone, The openair project has now been setup. Sign up to the mailing list here: http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/openair-devel The (sparse) project home page is here: http://common-lisp.net/project/openair/ -- Andy
9 May 2008 00:24
Re: openair project created
Ken Tilton <kennytilton <at> optonline.net>
2008-05-08 22:24:18 GMT
2008-05-08 22:24:18 GMT
Awesome. I can't wait for "hello world" to stabilize so I can start playing again. I also see myself as a user once I get going on the Algebra application and its web page. Glad to see the tarball option as well on gitorious, not that the git commands were that onerous. One less thing to learn, tho. kt
10 May 2008 23:23
Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1
Larry Clapp <larry <at> theclapp.org>
2008-05-10 21:23:39 GMT
2008-05-10 21:23:39 GMT
Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1. Is it supposed to? Problems include the lack of the excl and ide.base packages. Thanks for your help. -- Larry Clapp
10 May 2008 23:29
Re: Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1
Ken Tilton <kennytilton <at> optonline.net>
2008-05-10 21:29:20 GMT
2008-05-10 21:29:20 GMT
Larry Clapp wrote: > Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1. > Is it supposed to? > > Problems include the lack of the excl and ide.base packages. Try: (push :iamnotkenny *features*) <g> I'll change that shortly. Anyway, anything like that that still falls out can safely be commented out. kt
11 May 2008 00:13
Re: Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1
Larry Clapp <larry <at> theclapp.org>
2008-05-10 22:13:19 GMT
2008-05-10 22:13:19 GMT
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 05:29:20PM -0400, Ken Tilton wrote: > Larry Clapp wrote: > >Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux > >5.1. Is it supposed to? > > > >Problems include the lack of the excl and ide.base packages. > > Try: > > (push :iamnotkenny *features*) Yes, that did it. Silly me. Thanks. -- L
11 May 2008 00:22
Re: Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1
Ken Tilton <kennytilton <at> optonline.net>
2008-05-10 22:22:52 GMT
2008-05-10 22:22:52 GMT
Larry Clapp wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 05:29:20PM -0400, Ken Tilton wrote: > >>Larry Clapp wrote: >> >>>Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux >>>5.1. Is it supposed to? >>> >>>Problems include the lack of the excl and ide.base packages. >> >>Try: >> >> (push :iamnotkenny *features*) > > > Yes, that did it. Silly me. Thanks. > haha, well the silliness is obviously on my side, but that came up when I was trying to focus on my own work and not so much open source and things were quiet anyway, one or two users. I decided a compromise would be to still share improvements to Cells but leave other folks a little work. Now with Cells-Gtk ported to the latest version of Cells and OpenAIR potentially bringing in a lot more users I better clean that up. cheers, kt
11 May 2008 03:24
Re: Cells cvs does not compile out of the box on Lispworks for Linux 5.1
Larry Clapp <larry <at> theclapp.org>
2008-05-11 01:24:22 GMT
2008-05-11 01:24:22 GMT
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 06:22:52PM -0400, Ken Tilton wrote: > Now with Cells-Gtk ported to the latest version of Cells and OpenAIR > potentially bringing in a lot more users I better clean that up. Well, while you're at it, some things you might want to clean up: - http://www.tilton-technology.com/cells_top.html still points to http://www.tilton-technology.com/01-Cell-basics.lisp and should probably point to http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cells/doc/01-Cell-basics.lisp?rev=1.6&root=cells&view=auto. - The project page at common-lisp.net ("The repository of all other Cells code (including Cello) ...") points to the repository at http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cell-cultures/?cvsroot=cells, but should probably point to http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/?root=cells (but that doesn't include Cello, so maybe not). In any case, the link doesn't work. - The project page also says "In there you will find the Cells code itself here" and points to http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cell-cultures/cells/?cvsroot=cells but should be http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/cells/?root=cells. These were stumbling blocks in my Cells odyssey this evening. Thanks for your help. FWIW, I was not aware of the OpenAIR project, I just thought it was(Continue reading)
15 May 2008 18:15
Current DP ... not GE pulse ... of cell ...?
Peter Hildebrandt <peter.hildebrandt <at> gmail.com>
2008-05-15 16:15:42 GMT
2008-05-15 16:15:42 GMT
Every now and then I do something silly (like setf'ing a cell w/o initializing it as c-in, and I run into a cells-stop. What is the correct way to recover from this? I used to do a (cells-reset), but all too often the next cells operation runs into something like that: Current DP 28 not GE pulse 1160 of cell ... and somehow I don't get anything done until I restart lisp. So, what is the right way to deal with this? Thanks, Peter PS. The cells-store is working fine in my app, getting close to be ready for general use. I committed a store-items to cells-store.lisp recently. And one day I will rewrite it using proper cells wiring and not my own dirty little glue :)
RSS Feed