headers
christoph.oppawsky@t-online.de | 25 Nov 2006 01:26
Picon
Favicon

(no subject)

Hi,

I just tried to install the cells-gtk-2006-06-30 package on linux
(current gentoo) using cmucl 19a (and the hint on your page to change
%load-foreign-library in cffi/cffi-cmucl.lisp), under slime with the
ready-made library from cells-gtk (libcellgtk.so).

During compilation/loading I get the following error:

Undefined foreign symbol: "gtk_adds_ok"
   [Condition of type KERNEL:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR]

which I just accept. 

(This problem is solved after I compile my own LIBCELLSGTK.SO. For the
record: I'm using 
- gtk+-2.8.19
- libgtkxxx-2.0 (I'm not shure if thats the actual version. How do I
find out?
Compilation looks strange, sorry, I'm not too familiar with the
c-make-system:

eg. 

gcc -c gtk-adds.c `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0`
gcc: -lgtk-x11-2.0: Eingabedateien des Binders unbenutzt, da keine
Bindung geschieht (=input files of binder unused, because no binding
happens.)
(... same error for other targets)
gcc -shared -o libcellsgtk.so gtk-adds.o `pkg-config --cflags --libs
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Peter Denno | 25 Nov 2006 04:24
Favicon

Re: (no subject)

On Friday 24 November 2006 19:26, christoph.oppawsky <at> t-online.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to install the cells-gtk-2006-06-30 package on linux
> (current gentoo) using cmucl 19a (and the hint on your page to change
> %load-foreign-library in cffi/cffi-cmucl.lisp), under slime with the
> ready-made library from cells-gtk (libcellgtk.so).
>
> During compilation/loading I get the following error:
>
> Undefined foreign symbol: "gtk_adds_ok"
>    [Condition of type KERNEL:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR]
>
> which I just accept.
>
> (This problem is solved after I compile my own LIBCELLSGTK.SO. For the
> record: I'm using
> - gtk+-2.8.19

Yeah, the built version probably is getting a bit out of date.

> - libgtkxxx-2.0 (I'm not shure if thats the actual version. How do I
> find out?

There is a gtk API call to get the version. I thought we implemented it, but I 
don't see it.

> Compilation looks strange, sorry, I'm not too familiar with the
> c-make-system:
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane