How is everything you should consider this to get what you want this year http://newsjournal13.com/?date=DEC2611&token=09s2kw its really easy to understand
_______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list Whitebox-users <at> beau.org http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
Sup this is what you need http://homejournal13i.com/?token=9wk3j4&date=12182011 good luck
Hey this is what you need http://www2.home13journal.com/?date=12142011&token=291swo see ya
It's been a long time since I got an email from the list; this is a check to see if it's gone. No one need reply; If I get the email from the list I'll know it's still working. Jeff -- -- Jeff Lasman, Nobaloney Internet Services P.O. Box 52200, Riverside, CA 92517 Our blists address used on lists is for list email only voice: +1 951 643-5345, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"
Is this list alive??
It doesn't look it, at least on Gmane, and I'm very sorry to see
that.
Some guy on the Fedora list I follow*, named Rohit Gupta,
at Kalyani Government Engineering College (KGEC), somewhere in
India, is trying to get a Linux Users' Group (LUG) off the ground
-- and vaunts : "one more success: We have installed and setup
the library computer with fedora 10."
I doubt he guesses what a jackpot he has hit.
I started to refer him to Whitebox; discovered that it
seems to have done a classic imitation of Lost River (id est,
sunk into the ground); started to refer him to Autocat;
discovered searching the archives is a lot less obvious that I
thought -- so I decided to do a first search myself, and zap him
the result -- and couldn't do it, in fact. Aaarrgghhh, it's awful
to get old.
But I'm sure several of you (if any are left) still also follow
Autocat; and some no doubt will have better ideas than that.
Has there been any recent discussion of linux in
libraries, somewhere that a non-librarian could find? Where would
be a good place for him to get a start, to save reinventing
wheels within wheels?
*I think what I monitor (some of) is actually a list at
redhat.com; but I point my newsreader at news.gmane.org, and read
it as gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.general; the thread, titled "Want
to start a LUG with all fedora support," begins on March 12 --
just in case any of you want to jump in.
NB: In case anyone is unfamiliar with Gmane (Could any librarian
not be??), you can simply tell your newsreader to post a
followup; Gmane will send you an autoreply; you reply to that, or
go to a web page, to prove you exist (i.e., you're no spammer);
and Gmane then posts for you.
--
--
Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert
Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about.
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:24:18 -0600 whitebox-users-request <at> beau.org wrote: > Send Whitebox-users mailing list submissions to > whitebox-users <at> beau.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide > Web, visit > http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or > body 'help' to whitebox-users-request <at> beau.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > whitebox-users-owner <at> beau.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so > it is more specific than "Re: Contents of > Whitebox-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. WBEL-5 ??? (Carl Krauthauser) > 2. Re: WBEL-5 ??? (Vic) > 3. RE: WBEL-5 ??? (Mark A. Lewis) > 4. Re: WBEL-5 ??? (Alon) > 5. Re: WBEL-5 ??? (Multisys, Jim) > 6. RE: WBEL-5 ??? (Mark A. Lewis) > 7. RE: WBEL-5 ??? (Mark A. Lewis) > 8. Re: WBEL-5 ??? (Mike B.) > 9. Re: WBEL-5 ??? (Multisys, Jim) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:34:01 -0500 > From: Carl Krauthauser <carl <at> udel.edu> > Subject: [WBEL-users] WBEL-5 ??? > To: whitebox-users <at> beau.org > Message-ID: <49A97589.1000902 <at> udel.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowed > > Hello WBEL Users, > > I was giving serious thought to updating my > WBEL-4 box to an EL-5 box, and was wondering if > there was going to be some ISOs created for a > WBEL-5. I like the WBEL ( have been using the > different versions since its inception), and > would like to continue. Please let me know if > there is and impending release of a WBEL-5. > Thanks! > > > Best Regards, > Carl > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:22:50 -0000 (GMT) > From: "Vic" <whitebox <at> beer.org.uk> > Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] WBEL-5 ??? > To: "Carl Krauthauser" <carl <at> udel.edu> > Cc: whitebox-users <at> beau.org > Message-ID: > <48285.10.0.0.4.1235845370.squirrel <at> 10.0.0.4> > Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > > > Hello Carl, > > > Please let me know if > > there is and impending release of a WBEL-5. > > Thanks! > > There is - I'm running it in both 32-bit and > 64-bit flavours. > > The release is delayed somewhat by the fact > that I'm broke & I need to find some paying > work. But once that's settled, there'll be a > nice shiney WBEL5 to play with> > Vic. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:54:05 -0500 > From: "Mark A. Lewis" <Mark <at> siliconjunkie.net> > Subject: RE: [WBEL-users] WBEL-5 ??? > To: "whitebox <at> beer.org.uk" > <whitebox <at> beer.org.uk>, Carl Krauthauser > <carl <at> udel.edu> Cc: "whitebox-users <at> beau.org" > <whitebox-users <at> beau.org> Message-ID: > <5AA045F9B2DA814DAEF9521193F36FD6359C954C80 <at> kronos.siliconjunkie.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Wow, only a year after CentOS 5..... How proud > you the WBEL team must be! > > -----Original Message----- > From: whitebox-users-bounces <at> beau.org > [mailto:whitebox-users-bounces <at> beau.org] On > Behalf Of Vic Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 > 1:23 PM To: Carl Krauthauser Cc: > whitebox-users <at> beau.org Subject: Re: > [WBEL-users] WBEL-5 ??? > > > Hello Carl, > > > Please let me know if > > there is and impending release of a WBEL-5. > > Thanks! > > There is - I'm running it in both 32-bit and > 64-bit flavours. > > The release is delayed somewhat by the fact > that I'm broke & I need to find some paying > work. But once that's settled, there'll be a > nice shiney WBEL5 to play with
Hello Alon! Thank you for the advice, I do appreciate it. I have 3 machines here with which I use CentOS (1 with 4.7 and 2 with 5.2), all of which are servers. I also have one using WBEL 4, one using Startcom 5.2, and 2 using Scientific Linux 5.0.2 and 5.0.3. Once upon a time had a few using Tao Linux and X/OS Linux, and even toyed briefly with Lineox; all of the last were converted to CentOS. While I like CentOS very much, I have also liked the fact that it is is not the only RHEL-clone in town. I do not relish the thought of any of the others going the way of Tao, X/OS, and Lineox, thus, would like to support WBEL and the other efforts in ways that I can, starting with using them. For obvious reasons, my WBEL box does not have direct access to the outside world, but nonetheless, has done, until recently, all the code developmental work I have needed it to do. I am noticing that software development is moving at a slightly quicker pace than has been the case for me in the past, and so, am having to convert to newer versions of RHEL-clones quicker than before. While I should like to continue working with WBEL, being limited long term to WBEL-4 will mean having to migrate to CentOS, Startcom or SL. This will be sad because I truly like the variety of RHEL-clones, and it would mean for me that one more has gone by the wayside. It is this that precipitated my original question. Thanks again, Alon! Cheers, Carl whitebox-users-request <at> beau.org wrote: > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 22:00:08 +0200 > From: "Alon" <js <at> wsco.com> > Subject: Re: [WBEL-users] WBEL-5 ??? > To: <whitebox-users <at> beau.org> > Message-ID: <2025FC37E51C4428B001558DE43D917E <at> alonquadxp> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > Hello Carl, > > I was running 2 boxes of WBEL (3, and 4) myself and just 2 weeks ago we retired the WBEL4 for CentOS 5.2. > Development of WBEL has not been as fast as CentOS and support for it has been deminishing. > As much as I liked WBEL, I now run over 50 servers with CentOS and I would urge you to consider migrating to the > CentOS distro, simply for the sake of having more current updates. > If you visit WBEL own website you will notice it has not been keeping up-to-date since... over a year (last update was in Dec 2007). > > -Alon. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Carl Krauthauser > To: whitebox-users <at> beau.org > Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 7:34 PM > Subject: [WBEL-users] WBEL-5 ??? > > > Hello WBEL Users, > > I was giving serious thought to updating my WBEL-4 box to an EL-5 box, > and was wondering if there was going to be some ISOs created for a > WBEL-5. I like the WBEL ( have been using the different versions since > its inception), and would like to continue. Please let me know if > there is and impending release of a WBEL-5. Thanks! > > > Best Regards, > Carl > _______________________________________________ > Whitebox-users mailing list > Whitebox-users <at> beau.org > http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20090228/876fac87/attachment-0001.htm > >
On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 14:41 -0800, MJang wrote: > On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 16:38 -0500, Mark A. Lewis wrote: > > WBEL should seriously consider dropping the "Enterprise" portion of their > > name and call it White Box Hobby Linux or something, > > Yes, I wouldn't use WBEL 4 or 5 in an enterprise - today. But give 'em > a break. > They are volunteers. > WBEL was started as a project of a library in Louisiana, ref http://library.beau.org/ . The original developers had to back off due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Their priority first was to keep evacuees connected. As I understand it, they are still overworked with the recovery. Yes, WBEL was neglected as a result, but they had higher priorities. Vic has apparently taken over the project - and afaik works on his own. And the work behind creating a rebuild is harder than you might think, as the build libraries are tricky, to put it mildly. Thanks, Mike
Hello WBEL Users, I was giving serious thought to updating my WBEL-4 box to an EL-5 box, and was wondering if there was going to be some ISOs created for a WBEL-5. I like the WBEL ( have been using the different versions since its inception), and would like to continue. Please let me know if there is and impending release of a WBEL-5. Thanks! Best Regards, Carl
_______________________________________________ Whitebox-users mailing list Whitebox-users <at> beau.org http://beau.org/mailman/listinfo/whitebox-users
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
RSS Feed2 | |
|---|---|
2 | |
1 | |
11 | |
8 | |
6 | |
22 | |
1 | |
5 | |
11 | |
8 | |
3 | |
5 | |
1 | |
2 | |
22 | |
5 | |
2 | |
16 | |
36 | |
13 | |
3 | |
1 | |
44 | |
66 | |
15 | |
24 | |
63 | |
30 | |
15 | |
47 | |
35 | |
53 | |
86 | |
26 | |
55 | |
98 | |
36 | |
114 | |
169 | |
229 | |
350 | |
200 | |
269 | |
232 | |
369 | |
487 | |
491 | |
440 | |
494 | |
462 | |
496 | |
477 | |
375 | |
448 | |
280 | |
279 | |
170 | |
5 | |
1 |
