headers
Lars E. D. Jensen | 1 Dec 2004 09:47
Picon

Re: Can't catch more than 1 IP

Hi Herbert

Helpful as always :)

Tirsdag den 30. november 2004 18:22 skrev Herbert Poetzl:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:59:43PM +0100, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> > Hi list
> >
> > I have access to IP address space x.x.x.114 -> x.x.x.118
> >
> > But I can only catch x.x.x.118 with one virtual server.
> >
> > x.x.x.116 can't be allocated. Is this a configuration issue at my ISP or
> > is it a misconfiguration of my vservers?
>
> sorry my magic glass ball is in repair _again_ ;)
>
> need some details first like:
>
>  - what kernel, patches, what tools?

Host server -> Debian 3.0r3 (stable)
Vservers -> Latest Debian Sarge
Kernel 2.4.28
Linux-VServer Stable 1.29 (no extra patches)
util-vserver 0.30
All found here: http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_release/v1.29/

>  - what does 'catch' mean?
The vservers don't get assigned with an IP address, only one IP address get
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Herbert Poetzl | 1 Dec 2004 12:23
Picon

Re: Can't catch more than 1 IP

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:47:13AM +0100, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> Hi Herbert
> 
> Helpful as always :)
> 
> Tirsdag den 30. november 2004 18:22 skrev Herbert Poetzl:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 01:59:43PM +0100, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> > > Hi list
> > >
> > > I have access to IP address space x.x.x.114 -> x.x.x.118
> > >
> > > But I can only catch x.x.x.118 with one virtual server.
> > >
> > > x.x.x.116 can't be allocated. Is this a configuration issue at my ISP or
> > > is it a misconfiguration of my vservers?
> >
> > sorry my magic glass ball is in repair _again_ ;)
> >
> > need some details first like:
> >
> >  - what kernel, patches, what tools?
> 
> Host server -> Debian 3.0r3 (stable)
> Vservers -> Latest Debian Sarge
> Kernel 2.4.28
> Linux-VServer Stable 1.29 (no extra patches)
> util-vserver 0.30
> All found here: http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_release/v1.29/
> 
> >  - what does 'catch' mean?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
lukas.rueegg [pixworx multimedia] | 1 Dec 2004 15:14
Picon

debian doesn't compile 1.29 with quota patch

hello

I'm trying to compile 1.4.27 vanilla kernel on a woody system with the
following patches applied:

patch-2.4.27-vs1.29.diff
patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff

after configuring with 'make menuconfig' after the informations on the
following page
http://linux-vserver.org/Step-by-Step+Guide

I run 'make dep' and 'make-kpkg kernel_image'. the compiling of the kernel
always fails with the following errors:

===
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/usr/local/src/linux-2.4.27/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4.27-smp.vs1.29-q
uota/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-core.o
depmod:         init_cmd640_vlb
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/usr/local/src/linux-2.4.27/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4.27-smp.vs1.29-q
uota/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
depmod:         get_dqhash
depmod:         dlimit_transfer
depmod:         dqhash_transfer
depmod:         destroy_dqhash
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/usr/local/src/linux-2.4.27/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4.27-smp.vs1.29-q
uota/kernel/fs/ext3/ext3.o
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Herbert Poetzl | 1 Dec 2004 15:44
Picon

Re: debian doesn't compile 1.29 with quota patch

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:14:07PM +0100, lukas.rueegg [pixworx multimedia] wrote:
> hello
> 
> I'm trying to compile 1.4.27 vanilla kernel on a woody system with the
> following patches applied:
> 
> patch-2.4.27-vs1.29.diff
> patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff
> 
> after configuring with 'make menuconfig' after the informations on the
> following page
> http://linux-vserver.org/Step-by-Step+Guide
> 
> I run 'make dep' and 'make-kpkg kernel_image'. the compiling of the kernel
> always fails with the following errors:
> 
> ===
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
> /usr/local/src/linux-2.4.27/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4.27-smp.vs1.29-q
> uota/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-core.o
> depmod:         init_cmd640_vlb
> depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in

this is something completely unrelated ...
but probably selecting cmd640 (or deselecting it)
might helpt here ... (I'd try 2.4.28)

> /usr/local/src/linux-2.4.27/debian/tmp-image/lib/modules/2.4.27-smp.vs1.29-q
> uota/kernel/fs/ext2/ext2.o
> depmod:         get_dqhash
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Lars E. D. Jensen | 2 Dec 2004 12:08
Picon

Re: Can't catch more than 1 IP

> > Host server /etc/network/interfaces:
> > auto eth0
> > iface eth0 inet static
> >         address xxx.xxx.134.227
> >         netmask 255.255.255.248
> >         network xxx.xxx.134.224
> >         broadcast xxx.xxx.134.231
> >         gateway xxx.xxx.134.225
> >
> > Is it because of a misconfiguration of the vservers or the network maybe?
> > The host server is using xxx.xxx.134.xxx and the vservers use
> > xxx.xxx.132.xxx, could that influence on anything?
>
> well, yes, but if xxx.xxx.132.118 is working fine, then
> the same setup for the others should work fine too ...
>
> I would assume that the following scenario:
>
>  - the xxx.xxx.134.227/29 has a default gateway, which is
>    the attached router xxx.xxx.134.225 ...
>  - the xxx.xxx.132/24 would use some different default gw
>  - you have only one gateway configured
>  - the router does only accept the 132.118 on the 'wrong'
>    xxx.xxx.134.225 gateway ...
>
> in any case, this can easily be debugged by somebody
> who can check (or mirror) the router port ...

Ok, can I set the vservers to use another gateway/router than the host server?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Herbert Poetzl | 2 Dec 2004 16:13
Picon

Re: Can't catch more than 1 IP

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:08:54PM +0100, Lars E. D. Jensen wrote:
> > > Host server /etc/network/interfaces:
> > > auto eth0
> > > iface eth0 inet static
> > >         address xxx.xxx.134.227
> > >         netmask 255.255.255.248
> > >         network xxx.xxx.134.224
> > >         broadcast xxx.xxx.134.231
> > >         gateway xxx.xxx.134.225
> > >
> > > Is it because of a misconfiguration of the vservers or the network maybe?
> > > The host server is using xxx.xxx.134.xxx and the vservers use
> > > xxx.xxx.132.xxx, could that influence on anything?
> >
> > well, yes, but if xxx.xxx.132.118 is working fine, then
> > the same setup for the others should work fine too ...
> >
> > I would assume that the following scenario:
> >
> >  - the xxx.xxx.134.227/29 has a default gateway, which is
> >    the attached router xxx.xxx.134.225 ...
> >  - the xxx.xxx.132/24 would use some different default gw
> >  - you have only one gateway configured
> >  - the router does only accept the 132.118 on the 'wrong'
> >    xxx.xxx.134.225 gateway ...
> >
> > in any case, this can easily be debugged by somebody
> > who can check (or mirror) the router port ...
> 
> Ok, can I set the vservers to use another gateway/router
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Herbert Poetzl | 2 Dec 2004 18:22
Picon

Next Generation Networking ...


Hi Community!

It took a while (and we did a lot of other useful
stuff in the meantime) until the next step in linux
vserver networking has reached a point where it 
can be considered a path into the future ...

what it needs now is various help with testing and
fixing issues (which will be there, no doubt), so
everyone who is interested in helping out, please
let us know ...

here are some changes which are already part of
(or at least prepared) for the next generation
networking (NGNET) code ...

 - virtual and isolated interfaces
 - loopback virtualization and isolation
 - separated routing tables and routes
 - improved local address recognition
 - iptables supported vnet matching
 - hot network redirection (failsafe)
 - isolated ppp and tun devices
 - support for ipv6 on host and vservers

It took some time to figure methods to make it 
possible _without_ sacrificing performance, and
it probably will take some time until it can be
considered stable at all ...
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |
headers
jcpetit | 3 Dec 2004 00:28

patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff

Hello everyone,

do you know if I can use the patch: patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff
for the kernel2.4.28 ?
It seems to work but I'm not an expert..

thanks,

JC
  --
Jean-Christophe Petit
Directeur R&D et DSI
Syspark inc.
T: 1 514 875 8755
F: 1 514 875 8775

_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver <at> list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Herbert Poetzl | 3 Dec 2004 00:41
Picon

Re: patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 06:28:37PM -0500, jcpetit wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> do you know if I can use the patch: patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff
> for the kernel2.4.28 ?
> It seems to work but I'm not an expert..

yes, it should work, I just update the quota
patches when they stop working, so the
patch-2.4.27-vs1.29-q0.14.diff is valid for 
2.4.28 and probably? will be valid for 2.4.29 
too ...

HTH,
Herbert

> thanks,
> 
> JC
>  --
> Jean-Christophe Petit
> Directeur R&D et DSI
> Syspark inc.
> T: 1 514 875 8755
> F: 1 514 875 8775
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver <at> list.linux-vserver.org
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy | 3 Dec 2004 05:29

bypass xid enforcement flag?


Is there a flag that can be set that ignores persistent xids and allows a 
context to access files which are set to xids other than 0 or itself?

(this is vs 1.9.3)

Thanks!

Grisha
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver <at> list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane