devzero | 1 May 2008 14:39
Picon

excessively high Load_Cycle_Count

hi!

just being curious since WD support seems so unresponsive with this - has anybody experienced abnormal
high load_cycle_count with his disk(s) ?

i wonder if this only happens on linux due to different buffer-flush-intervals, so i`d rather be
interested, if windows machines also suffer from this problem.

see discussion threads at :
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=120777293511872&w=2

parking hdd heads more than 90000 in about 900hrs with a system/root disk looks scary to me, especially
because most specs tell that disks can "only" do <1.000.000 of those.

i`d like to get a clue if it`s up to the hardware manufacturer or to the OS guys to fix this and i`d be interested
in raising awareness.

btw, what about adding a feature to smartcl to divide load Load_Cycle_Count by Power_On_Hours and spit out
an additional message when resulting value is abnormally high ?

regards
roland

ps:
the only way to tune the parking interval for WD GreenPower drives is getting a proprietary tool from WD
support, btw.

_______________________________________________________________________
EINE FÜR ALLE: die kostenlose WEB.DE-Plattform für Freunde und Deine
Homepage mit eigenem Namen. Jetzt starten! http://unddu.de/?kid=kid <at> mf2
(Continue reading)

Matthew Rich | 5 May 2008 18:15

reset SMART health status?

Hello,

I have an elderly Dell PE 2550 that I am using as a testbed platform. 
That is, it is used for experimenting with networking setups, sysadmin 
scripting, virtualization, and anything I want to play with that I need 
actual hardware for (and thus can't just use a VM). As a consequence, 
there is absolutely no mission critical data on this box and if I wreck 
the OS, I can just reinstall and start over.

It has two SCSI drives in it, and several months ago one of them began 
reporting SMART errors. The output of smartctl -a is at the end of this 
email.

Specifically, it looks to me like the disk found two bad blocks at that 
time but has not had any errors since, and two long background 
self-tests I ran just a few days ago found no errors.

The LED on the front of the drive is green and the long self test comes 
up clean, and since I have no valuable data on the drive it's 
essentially "good enough" for me right now. And since it's well out of 
warranty and SCSI ultra-320 disks are needlessly expensive these days I 
don't plan to replace it until it croaks for good -- which it shows no 
sign of doing anytime soon. However, I am getting tired of the constant 
notifications from smartd.

So my question is -- how can I "reset" that SMART health status? I have 
been reading man pages (sg3_utils, smartmontools, etc.) and SCSI mode 
page documents all morning with no luck. Basically I want to either 
change the "threshold" for the LOGICAL UNIT FAILURE PREDICTION to more 
than the two errors its found or, if that's not possible, just zero out 
(Continue reading)

Marcel Meyer | 5 May 2008 18:52
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: extremely high Reallocated_Sector_Ct

Hi Bruce,

Am Dienstag, 29. April 2008 schrieb Bruce Allen:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Marcel Meyer wrote:
> > I just got a new hd into my laptop and am a little bit surprised about
> > the values smartctl gives me. Please have a look below. Especially the
> > unbelievable high Reallocated_Sector_Ct and Reallocated_Event_Count
> > frightens me ;-). What's up with this harddisk?
>
> Disk looks OK -- extended self-test finds the disk clean. The reallocated
> sector count 457310208 = hexidecimal 1B420000.  Probably the last four
> digits (0000) is the number of reallocated sectors.

It seems your guess is right. After another 90 hours (now 180 hours total) 
work and 9 power cycles only the following values changes (despite of 
uptime, cyles or temperature of course):

Raw_Read_Error_Rate            7974 -> 91733
Seek_Error_Rate                 292 -> 1178
Load_Cycle_Count                328 -> 881
Hardware_ECC_Recovered           32 -> 185
Multi_Zone_Error_Rate         28037 -> 15088
Run_Out_Cancel         429509246925 -> 2628531060695

Would you say this is still ok? And do you want me anything to do (running 
special tools/sending in logs) in case you want to adapt smartmontools to 
this harddrives specific way of storing some values?

Thanks,
Marcel
(Continue reading)

Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe | 6 May 2008 12:58
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Re: extremely high Reallocated_Sector_Ct

Bruce Allen <ballen <at> gravity.phys.uwm.edu> wrote:
> Disk looks OK -- extended self-test finds the disk clean. The reallocated 
> sector count 457310208 = hexidecimal 1B420000.  Probably the last four 
> digits (0000) is the number of reallocated sectors.
>
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Marcel Meyer wrote:
>>  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   024    Pre-fail  Always       -       8589934592000
>> 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       457310208
>> 203 Run_Out_Cancel          0x0002   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       -       429509246925

Similar here with a new FUJITSU MHW2080AT Firmware 0000000B

  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   = 8589934592000 = 0x7D000000000
196 Reallocated_Event_Count =     455475200 =    0x1B260000
203 Run_Out_Cancel          = 1529008553543 = 0x1640002FE47

regards
   Mario
--

-- 
I have great faith in fools; self-confidence my friends call it.
                                              -- Edgar Allan Poe

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Thomas Herzog | 8 May 2008 10:21
Picon

FreeBSD 7.0 hptrr

Hi list,

since FreeBSD 6.3/7.0 there is a native driver for HighPoint RocketRAID 
devices, is there a way to monitor the disks behind?
if not, is there a plan to implement this feature?

thanks
Thomas

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Eduard Martinescu | 8 May 2008 15:46

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 hptrr

I personally do not own a motherboard or add-on card with a HighPoint RocketRAID chipset, so I won't be able
to develop or test any support for this.  However, I believe we are always open to patches, and additional developers.

Ed

(FreeBSD Port Maintainer)

On Thursday 08 May 2008 04:21:02 am Thomas Herzog wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> since FreeBSD 6.3/7.0 there is a native driver for HighPoint RocketRAID 
> devices, is there a way to monitor the disks behind?
> if not, is there a plan to implement this feature?
> 
> thanks
> Thomas
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Smartmontools-support mailing list
> Smartmontools-support <at> lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
(Continue reading)

Rob Townley | 9 May 2008 01:33
Picon

md5 sum for 5.38 release

i noticed there has not been a md5 sum released for a while.  The .asc files used to be on the downloads page, but there has not been one posted since 5.36  /  2006-04-12.  i supposed this is why CentOS has not added the 5.38 rpm to the CentOS yum repositories.  Please add a md5 sum for the 5.38 gz or release a new version with it. 
 
i downloaded the 5.38 tarball to test cciss on my hp proliant dl 360, but can't go further wo an md5 sum or other means of verification.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Smartmontools-support mailing list
Smartmontools-support <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support
Thomas Herzog | 9 May 2008 07:58
Picon

Re: FreeBSD 7.0 hptrr

Hi,

i would help to make a patch, but i have few coding experience.
the hptrr driver has Scott Long portet to FreeBSD, is it possible that you ask him about this problem,
because i have no 
email and it is better when 2 Port Maintainer speak together, or can you give me a hint, where i can get some infos.

thomas

Eduard Martinescu wrote:
> I personally do not own a motherboard or add-on card with a HighPoint RocketRAID chipset, so I won't be able
to develop or test any support for this.  However, I believe we are always open to patches, and additional developers.
> 
> Ed
> 
> (FreeBSD Port Maintainer)
> 
> 
> On Thursday 08 May 2008 04:21:02 am Thomas Herzog wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> since FreeBSD 6.3/7.0 there is a native driver for HighPoint RocketRAID 
>> devices, is there a way to monitor the disks behind?
>> if not, is there a plan to implement this feature?
>>
>> thanks
>> Thomas
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
>> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
>> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
>> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
>> _______________________________________________
>> Smartmontools-support mailing list
>> Smartmontools-support <at> lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support
>>
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
> Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
> Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
> _______________________________________________
> Smartmontools-support mailing list
> Smartmontools-support <at> lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Arne Brutschy | 9 May 2008 16:11
Picon
Picon
Favicon

Smartd reporting failed disk test, but smartctl says smart is not supported

Hi,

the smartd of one of our cluster nodes reported a problem with it's
harddisk:

    May  9 15:53:09 compute-1-6 smartd[3501]: Device: /dev/sda, FAILED SMART self-check. BACK UP DATA NOW! 

A smartctl -a /dev/sda gives me a:

        smartctl version 5.33 [i686-redhat-linux-gnu] Copyright (C)
        2002-4 Bruce Allen
        Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/

        Device: ATA      ST380815AS       Version: 3.AA
        Serial number:             5QZ0C8KW
        Device type: disk
        Local Time is: Fri May  9 16:03:14 2008 CEST
        Device does not support SMART
        Request Sense failed, [Input/output error]

        Error Counter logging not supported

        Error Events logging not supported

        [GLTSD (Global Logging Target Save Disable) set. Enable Save
        with '-S on']
        Device does not support Self Test logging

The harddisk does support smart. But anyways, how does smartd think it's
broken
if it can't be queried at all? Is this even possible?

BTW, smartctl give me that output on all my nodes with the same
configuration.
But these nodes do not complain about a mysteriously broken disk...

The disk is connected to a on-board Sil3114 SATA Controller (no raid) on
a
Tyan Thunder K8SD Pro (S2882-D). No Smart setting in BIOS. We're using a
Redhat derivate (CentOS4) with Linux kernel 2.6.9-67, loaded module is
sata_svw.

Can someone shed some light on this please?

Cheers
Arne

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
Jani Patanen | 12 May 2008 12:44
Picon

Reallocated_Sector_Ct not updating

Hi all.

First i'd like to thank all those who have contributed to smartmon tools. I'm a long time user and now it's paying off.

Model Family:     Hitachi Travelstar 5K100 series
Device Model:     HTS541060G9AT00

The drive has encountered 4 bad sectors of which I was warned about. Did some googling to find out how to get the drive to map bad sectors to good ones. dd is the tool for that one. What I did was trying to read offending sector. That resulted to read error. That confirmed to me that I had identified the correct spot on the drive. Next what I did was to write that sector with zeros (from /dev/zero). After that I was able to read the same sector without read errors. Everything OK so far. Looking at SMART stats shows Current_Pending_Sector decreased by one. Yet Reallocated_Sector_Ct has not increased. I went to do long surface scan just to be sure that the values get updated. I thought that attribute should increase everytime there is a sector being remapped. Is this normal behaviour?

The drive is not my personal, but my work laptop. I'd rather get the drive replaced, but if I continue remapping and drive reports no reallocated sectors and has no sectors pending reallocation, I don't think I have much chance of a replacement drive because I have no evidence to show that the drive is going bad (except old errors).

What is the general experience on having sectors remapped and continuing to use the drive, for example in situations where the bad sectors are most likely a result of a shock? "Remap the sectors and don't worry" or "it will fail again in the future, better replace it"?

Last but not least: Is there a (windows) tool to identify what file occupies certain sector on NTFS drive?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. 
Use priority code J8TL2D2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Smartmontools-support mailing list
Smartmontools-support <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/smartmontools-support

Gmane