1 May 2011 09:18
Re: [microblaze-linux] BRAM Kernel Usage in recent kernels
Steven J. Magnani wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 15:45 -0400, Alejandro Cabrera wrote: >> Hi >> >> Do anyone know if kernel code/data are placed into BRAMs after booting ? >> I want to know what is the kernel minimum BRAM memory requirement. >> >> Kernel 2.6.20 (petalinux-0.4-final) has config parameters that allow the >> kernel BRAM usage, but in recent kernels, >= 2.6.31 I dont see it. Even >> I found a patch at mainline that allow system without BRAM at all.... Some kernel parts were moved to the BRAM to speedup networking and maybe others but it can't go to the mainline because it is just hack. The second mainline patch is for people who want to completely remove bram. Main memory is place from address 0x0 and there is necessary do some things to support it. That's why there is this option. >> >> What are the reason to remove the config parameters ?? just hack which is not acceptable for mainline. >> >> best regards >> Alejandro >> > > Hi Alejandro - >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed