Ubuntu Help and User Discussions

Robson Sampaio via LinkedIn | 1 Apr 2011 01:04

Convite para conectar-se no LinkedIn

Robson Sampaio requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:

Patrick,

Eu gostaria de adicioná-lo à minha rede profissional no LinkedIn.
-Robson

DID YOU KNOW you can be the first to know when a trusted member of your network changes jobs?
With Network Updates on your LinkedIn home page, you'll be notified as members of your network change their current position. Be the first to know and reach out!

<div>

<table border="0" width="550" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>  
  <h1>LinkedIn</h1>
<div>
      <p>Robson Sampaio requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:</p>

  <p>
    Patrick,<br><br>
Eu gostaria de adicion&aacute;-lo &agrave; minha rede profissional no LinkedIn.<br>
-Robson
  </p>

  <div>&nbsp;</div>

    <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr>
<td>
						<table border="0" cellpadding="6" cellspacing="1" align=""><tr><td align="center" valign="middle" bgcolor="#FFE86C"><div><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/-4wec6n-glyal7dm-3/NE2bzGJS1lCAMLWXQjiSHiiEWcCZMLczQiCNOGKytORD/blk/I116676808_9/pmpxnSRJrSdvj4R5fnhv9ClRsDgZp6lQs6lzoQ5AomZIpn8_elYUc3wSdPoScj59bTlVrT5Ie7xgbPAVdP0OczkNdz8LrCBxbOYWrSlI/EML_comm_afe/"><span>Accept</span></a></div></td></tr></table>
</td>
          <td> 
                <a href="http://www.linkedin.com/e/-4wec6n-glyal7dm-3/NE2bzGJS1lCAMLWXQjiSHiiEWcCZMLczQiCNOGKytORD/blk/I116676808_9/0VnPwMe3oTdzoNckALqnpPbOYWrSlI/S2_svi/">View invitation from Robson Sampaio</a>
          </td>
      </tr></table>
<br><div>&nbsp;</div>
   <br><p> DID YOU KNOW you can be the first to know when a trusted member of your network changes jobs?<br> With Network Updates on your <a hreef="http://www.linkedin.com/">LinkedIn home page</a>, you'll be notified as members of your network change their current position. Be the first to know and reach out! </p>
  <div>&nbsp;</div>
</div>

  <p>&copy; 2011, LinkedIn Corporation</p>

</td></tr></table>
</div>

headers

Cybe R. Wizard | 1 Apr 2011 02:28

Re: How can I know to which ubuntu package does a specified file (not on my fs) belongs?

On Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:11:07 -0700
NoOp <glgxg <at> sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> According to this:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/508089
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=540905
> you should be able to even run '$ apt-file update' without 'su/sudo'.
> 
> I'll try on another system and/or purge & reinstall on this one.

It 'Worked For Me' without sudo and put a directory in my /home/cybe
at /.cache/apt-file containing all the gzipped files it downloaded.

Cybe R. Wizard
--

-- 
When Windows are opened the bugs come in.
	Winduhs

headers

Kipton Moravec | 1 Apr 2011 07:47

Re: Evolution Problems - Summary and Folder mismatch, even after sync

On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 14:16 -0700, Pongo A. Pan wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 13:19 -0500, Kipton Moravec wrote:
> > I am having problems with Evolution>
> > 
> > I have 
> > 
> > "Error while Expunging Folder 
> > Summary and Folder mismatch, even after sync"
> > 
> > and 
> > 
> > "Error while Fetching Mail
> > Summary and Folder mismatch, even after sync"
> > 
> > A google search turned up deleting the
> > ~/.evolution/mail/local/Inbox.ev-summary file.
> > 
> > Did that, and restarted Evolution and got the same message. 
> 
> You should probably ask this on the evolution list.
> If you do, and you're using the version of evo supplied with Ubuntu
> 10.10 or earlier (you don't say), they'll just say "too old, full 'o
> bugs, get an updated version."  This ppa has the latest:
> http://ppa.launchpad.net/konstigt/evolution/ubuntu  Works well in Mint
> 10, so should do as well in Ubuntu Maverick.
> 
> For some reason, 10.10 was released with an old version; much derision
> about Ubuntu and family on the evo list.
> 
> The evo version in 11.04 (beta today!) is the latest.  This also worked
> well for me in (so far) limited testing.  

I am running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS - the Lucid Lynx
My version of Evolution is 2.28.3

I went to the link you provided but have no clue what to do once I get
there. It looks like there is a version 2.32.2-0ubuntu3~maverick1 for
the i386.

There is a Packages, Packages.bz2 and a Packages.gz both at about 11K

I don't know what to do with it. I went to the 
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallingSoftware

Page and did not recognize any of the formats to use for updating this.

I also went to the Evolution page 
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Evolution
Which had no help.

There was a link to:
http://projects.gnome.org/evolution/
I was able to download evolution-2.32.2.tar.bz2 but I do not know what
to do with that file either and I don't know if it is for a i386 or not.

There is not an apt-get command to update me to the latest version? 

Why doesn't evolution update when update manager runs? It seems to
update everything else.

Why is this so difficult?

--

-- 
Kipton Moravec AE5IB .- . ..... .. -...

"Always do right; this will gratify some people and astonish the rest."
--Mark Twain

headers

Chris | 1 Apr 2011 08:11

11.04 32-bit to 64-bit

Hi folks
Currently I'm enjoying Alpha of the above and will move to Beta-1 this weekend.
I running 32-bit now but wish to install 64.  My Sony is 64 and has a max ram of 2 gig. So 2 questions

1. Would I really gain much by moving to 64-bit?

2. Are there about as many packages for 64 as there are for 32? If not, ought the 32 bit packages run under the 64
bit install?

Tia!

Chris
Sent from my BlackBerry®
--

-- 
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users <at> lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

headers

Nils Kassube | 1 Apr 2011 08:17

Re: How can I know to which ubuntu package does a specified file (not on my fs) belongs?

NoOp wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 02:42 PM, Nils Kassube wrote:
> > IMHO it should work without sudo. On my Lucid machine it works for
> > a user who is not in the groups adm or admin. Only updating the
> > database is restricted to root.
> 
> No idea why it doesn't.
> $ groups
> gg adm disk dialout fax cdrom floppy tape audio dip video plugdev
> scanner vboxusers netdev lpadmin powerdev admin fuse saned sambashare
> 
> But poking around launchpad:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/620463
> [If run "sudo apt-file update" only, run apt-file without sudo
> display nothing]

I think that explains it. I only tried on Lucid and not Maverick.

Nils

headers

Goh Lip | 1 Apr 2011 08:26

Re: 11.04 64bit Beta1 CD Install FAILS - Now what do I do?

On Friday 01,April,2011 05:04 AM, Jesse Palser wrote:
> 11.04 64bit Beta1 CD Install FAILS - Now what do I do?
>
> Hi,
>
> I downloaded official 11.04 64bit Beta1 CD ISO
> and verified its md5sum
> and burned image to a CD
> and verified the CD after burning.
>
> I then rebooted computer with CD in drive.
> CD boots fine and after a few minutes
> I am greeted with the screen to run or install OS.
>
> I click on install button
> and it goes through install process
> but at time of "Installing system"
> the installer stops with an error message:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> (-) An error occurred while installing packages:
> E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> The following packages are in a broken state:
>
>
>
> This may be due to using an old installer image, or it may be
> due to a bug in some of the packages listed above. More
> details may be found in /var/log/syslog. The installer will try
> to continue anyway, but may fail at a later point, and will not
> be able to install or remove other packages (possibly
> including itself) from the installed system. You should first
> look for newer versions of your installer image, or failing that
> report the problem to your distributor.
>
> [OK]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> After I click [OK] the installer immediately says install finished
> and the computer ejects the CD and it reboots
> after which I just get a GRUB command prompt.
> (The installation FAILED)
>
> I've tried it 3 times, each time formatting the HDD.
>
> What do I do now?
> I participated in the Beta 1 testing here:
> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/result/5333/6
> and I filled a bug report here:
> http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/746492
> (but no one try to fix this problem?)
>
> My System Specifications:
> - Dell XPS 420 (custom modified)
> - Intel Core2Extreme 3.0GHz 4-Core CPU
> - 8GB DDR2 RAM Memory
> - nVidia GeForce GTS 450 1GB DDR5 VRAM PCIexpress Video Adapter
> - Creative Sound Blaster Audigy SE PCI Sound Card
> (hardware is working perfectly and I currently run 10.10 64bit on it)
>
> Hope someone can help and fix this
> as I don't want to be force to wait until end of month
> for the next Beta 2 release.
>
> Thanks...
>
> Jesse "JeZ+Lee"
>

When grub prompt appears type and enter after each command
set root=(hd0,x)
linux (hd0,x)/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=/dev/sdax ro single
initrd (hd0,x)/boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-7-generic
boot

Notes:
o change the 'x''s of (hd0,x) and /dev/sdax to the partition number
   if sdb, then (hd1,x) and /dev/sdbx
o assume your partition is not in btrfs format and /boot is in /
   otherwise amend accordingly
o if unsure of partition, replace with

search --set=root -f /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=/dev/sdax ro single
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-7-generic
boot

When booted to recovery console,
repair
sudo apt-get -f install
sudo apt-get update
sudo apt-get upgrade
boot normal

Regards - Goh Lip

ps: I do not have problem installing, though using kubuntu 64 bit.
Also have no problem booting up the iso file but need to install with 
physical cd.

headers

Goh Lip | 1 Apr 2011 08:46

Re: 11.04 64bit Beta1 CD Install FAILS - Now what do I do?

On 04/01/2011 02:26 PM, Goh Lip wrote:
> o if unsure of partition, replace with
>
> search --set=root -f /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic
> linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=/dev/sdax ro single
> initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-7-generic
> boot

Sorry, I mean at grub prompt find the partition by
grub> search -f /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic

then knowing the 'x' in /dev/sdax,

search --set=root -f /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic
linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-7-generic root=/dev/sdax ro single
initrd /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-7-generic
boot

Regards - Goh Lip

headers

Basil Chupin | 1 Apr 2011 11:21

Re: [RESOLVED - MAYBE] [UPDATE} Need help, please, with burning DVDs

On 31/03/2011 12:55, Basil Chupin wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 02:25, Richard wrote:
>> On 03/29/2011 08:24 AM, Basil Chupin wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been using k3b for years to burn video DVDs both 4.7GB and 8.5GB
>>> without any problems - until this week:'( . I am using a Pioneer DVD-RW
>>> DVR-110 burner which burns the full range of DVDs (except, of course,
>>> BluRay).
>>
>> Basil, what version of K3b are you using? I'm using 2.0.1
>
> Ditto. The latest version is 2.0.2, with some bug fixes, but it is not 
> available for Maverick, and when I tried to compile it from source the 
> process collapsed with an error message.
>
>> and it works fine on the same platform as yours. I've had a similar 
>> problem traceable to the permissions stuff found under Settings>Setup 
>> System Permissions. sometimes an update diddles those things.
>>
>> At the K3bSetup page, my permissions are 660 on the device and 0755 
>> on cdrdao and cdrecord and growisof. It recommends using 0666 on the 
>> device and 4711 on the cdrstuff. I left mine alone and it seems to be 
>> working fine, so far.
>>
>> Of course, it could be something as simple as your Writer simply 
>> crapped out. Can you read cds and dvds?
>
> Initially I was most happy because, as you and rikona suggested, the 
> problem appeared to lie with the burner itself and disappeared when I 
> installed another burner from another computer after which I was able 
> to burn, in succession, 4 DVD -R DL discs without any problems.
>
> But then the wheels fell off (well, almost)  .
>
> When I went to burn discs #5 and #6 the burn went to the end but then 
> I got the 'normal' error messages with the first being "Unable to 
> fixate the disc"  . However, the drive did NOT lock up AND the DVDs 
> actually play normally!
>
> So, I don't know what the heck is going on and why.
>
> I spent some time yesterday going around trying to find a new burner 
> but had no luck so ordered one online from "my favourite shop" which 
> is interstate. Installing this brand new unit tomorrow will show if it 
> is the device or some fiddle in Ubuntu/k3b.

Well, a new, "untouched by human hands", DVDRW (a Pioneer DDVR-118) 
installed today and I burnt a DVD -R DL. Same result as I mentioned for 
discs #5 & #6 above: "Unable to fixate the disk"  . So, it's not the 
device but either k3b or some Ubuntu upgrade which was put thru in the 
last 2 weeks. Back to the drawing-board.

BC

--

-- 
Any experiment in life will be at your own experience.

headers

Chhatoi Pritam Baral | 1 Apr 2011 13:01

Re: 11.04 32-bit to 64-bit

1) 2 Gig of RAM means no significant improvement over usage of RAM, that would be only if you had more than 3 Gigs.

2) Applications generally run faster on 64-bit*.

3) You can "run" most 32-bit programs if you install the ia32-libs package. But you cant "install" them the normal way though.

*flash might be a bit of a pain, but I think adobe guys provide a preview-release which should work just fine. You can always use d 32-bit flash plugin if you have nspluginwrapper installed.

Regards,
Chhatoi Pritam Baral

<div><div dir="ltr">1) 2 Gig of RAM means no significant improvement over usage of RAM, that would be only if you had more than 3 Gigs.<div>2) Applications generally run faster on 64-bit*.</div>
<div>3) You can "run" most 32-bit programs if you install the ia32-libs package. But you cant "install" them the normal way though.</div>

<div><br></div>
<div>*flash might be a bit of a pain, but I think adobe guys provide a preview-release which should work just fine. You can always use d 32-bit flash plugin if you have nspluginwrapper installed.<br clear="all"><div dir="ltr">
<div><span>&nbsp;</span></div>
<div><br></div>

Regards,<br>Chhatoi Pritam Baral</div>
</div>
</div></div>

headers

Chhatoi Pritam Baral | 1 Apr 2011 13:11

Re: Remaster Ubuntu 10.04 desktop install CD

Very detailed description:

https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomizationFromScratch

Regards,
Chhatoi Pritam Baral

<div><div dir="ltr">
<div>Very detailed description:</div>
<a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomizationFromScratch">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/LiveCDCustomizationFromScratch</a><span class="Apple-style-span">&nbsp;</span><div dir="ltr">

<div><br></div>Regards,<br>Chhatoi Pritam Baral<br>
</div>

</div></div>

438	May 2013
686	April 2013
840	March 2013
621	February 2013
723	January 2013
763	December 2012
770	November 2012
754	October 2012
873	September 2012
713	August 2012
992	July 2012
1131	June 2012
943	May 2012
719	April 2012
968	March 2012
958	February 2012
894	January 2012
1208	December 2011
1193	November 2011
1514	October 2011
1829	September 2011
1317	August 2011
1635	July 2011
1693	June 2011
2201	May 2011
1596	April 2011
1241	March 2011
1175	February 2011
1603	January 2011
1783	December 2010
2679	November 2010
2738	October 2010
2591	September 2010
2165	August 2010
2550	July 2010
2055	June 2010
2872	May 2010
2734	April 2010
2314	March 2010
2750	February 2010
3097	January 2010
2756	December 2009
3097	November 2009
2515	October 2009
2649	September 2009
2236	August 2009
2899	July 2009
2886	June 2009
4079	May 2009
3471	April 2009
3118	March 2009
2547	February 2009
3139	January 2009
2742	December 2008
3586	November 2008
3053	October 2008
2765	September 2008
3282	August 2008
3229	July 2008
3558	June 2008
3512	May 2008
3356	April 2008
2503	March 2008
2767	February 2008
2522	January 2008
2185	December 2007
2999	November 2007
3554	October 2007
2045	September 2007
2182	August 2007
2052	July 2007
2294	June 2007
2475	May 2007
2678	April 2007
2395	March 2007
2260	February 2007
2345	January 2007
2039	December 2006
2860	November 2006
2916	October 2006
2916	September 2006
3699	August 2006
4016	July 2006
4823	June 2006
3384	May 2006
4314	April 2006
3580	March 2006
2703	February 2006
3633	January 2006
3750	December 2005
3377	November 2005
4246	October 2005
3377	September 2005
3060	August 2005
3831	July 2005
3313	June 2005
3893	May 2005
5166	April 2005
3889	March 2005
3642	February 2005
3256	January 2005
3682	December 2004
4066	November 2004
6877	October 2004
2517	September 2004
2	February 2002
2	January 2002
1	January 2000

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun

				1	2	3
4	5	6	7	8	9	10
11	12	13	14	15	16	17
18	19	20	21	22	23	24
25	26	27	28	29	30