jam | 1 Feb 2004 02:59

Re: X crashes on clients, k12ltsp4

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Jeff Nelson wrote:

> Jim,
> I've followed your instructions for ALLOW_PROCREAD = Y and went through
> my dhcpd.leases to get an address to telnet to.  I found which
> workstation was on by pinging it, and then did:
> 	telnet ws247 9200
> 
> And got "connection refused."
> 
> I repeated that with the IP address instead of ws247, but with the same
> result.  
> 
> So I thought, well, maybe I need to install the telnet daemon on the
> server, did so, activated it, confirmed that it was active by telnetting
> localhost, and still, get "connection refused" when attempting to telnet
> the workstation.  

telnetd is ONLY if you want to telnet INTO your server, which is not
what you are trying to do.

if you want to be sure of the IP address for that workstation, just tail 
the /var/log/messages file immediately after booting the workstation.  
You should see the dhcp reply message that shows what IP address it was.

Try telnetting using the IP address, rather than the hostname.

that is:     telnet 192.168.0.247 9200

As long as your workstation is booted, it should work.
(Continue reading)

Luís Miguel Silva | 1 Feb 2004 03:30
Picon

ltsp-sound...and SIS sound onboard problem

Hello all,

I just setup a LTSP server running gentoo and a thin client.
It "all works perfectly" except the sound which i simply CANT make it
work!

I booted my ltsp client on runlevel 3 and nasd or esd simply *dont
start*.

nasd complains about something while opening /dev/dsp (which doesnt
work).

I have tried loading a lot of modules like sound, soundcore, sis, sisfb,
etc but none of them seem to create /dev/dsp.

Although when i load some of these modules, i get some new devices like
/dev/audio and /dev/sound/*

Can anybody help me? I RTFM on google for nasd+sis but couldnt find any
satisfactory answer anywhere!

PS: Im using ltsp version 3.x.
PS2: also i had to use a vesa driver on x-win for my onboard graphic
controller (couf...i use one of those cheap boards with
every'thing'onboard...).

Has anybody got a sis onboard graphic controller working properlly as a
lts client? If so, can you please paste a sample conf here?

Thanks in advance,
(Continue reading)

Pradeep Bhomia | 1 Feb 2004 09:28
Picon

Re: LTSP4 and Local Applications

Dear Bryn,

I have setup LTSP4 with Local Application enabled. And I am using Mozilla 
Firebird 0.7 running as local app on thin clients. All I did was, I 
downloaded all the tarballs from ltsp website and compiled the whole thing. 
It took nearly 4 hours. Then I used the ltsp root. Then I unzipped the 
Mozilla Firebird tgz in the ltsp root. Copied all the required libraries from 
the main OS into the ltsp root. And Firebird was working as a local app on 
the thin clients. I have followed the procedure as mentioned by Jim. Only 
place I have deviated is that I am not using ssh to run the local app, 
instead I am using rsh. Reason being that I have nearly 40 odd thin clients 
and nearly 1000 users. 
I have added Flash plugins into the browser and copied the necessary library 
files into ltsp root. So far I have not faced any major problem with the 
browser except that it is a bit slow and needs 128MB RAM on thin client to 
work properly. I have also faced problem with javascripts ( on certain sites 
the button don't work properly ). Otherwise it is more stable than Netscape 
4.77 that was available with LTSP3.0

Just to add, my thin clients are used only for browsing internet and my setup 
is Mandrake Linux 9.1 with Icewm.

Pradeep Bhomia 

---------- Original Message -----------
From: jam@...
To: Bryn Salisbury <bryn.salisbury@...>
Cc: ltsp-discuss@...
Sent: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 10:24:34 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP4 and Local Applications
(Continue reading)

phil | 2 Feb 2004 00:48
Picon

modprobe problem

Having installed LTSP4 on a fedora box, on boot up I get "modprobe: Can't open
dependencies file /lib/modules/2.4.22-ltsp-2/modules.dep".  The only other
post I could find regarding this was one from a guy who had built his own
kernel, but I have just used the stock build, any ideas?

Regards

Phil

--
Phil Foxton
+44 7966 336218

-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

jam | 2 Feb 2004 00:40

Re: modprobe problem

Phil,

Any chance you didn't actually "Install" the ltsp-3 kernel package ?

If you grab the ltsp_kernel package from ltsp.org, and install it 
properly, it will put the kernel modules in the 
/opt/ltsp/i386/lib/modules directory.

Jim McQuillan
jam@...

On Sun, 1 Feb 2004, phil wrote:

> Having installed LTSP4 on a fedora box, on boot up I get "modprobe: Can't open
> dependencies file /lib/modules/2.4.22-ltsp-2/modules.dep".  The only other
> post I could find regarding this was one from a guy who had built his own
> kernel, but I have just used the stock build, any ideas?
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 
> --
> Phil Foxton
> +44 7966 336218
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
(Continue reading)

Erik Proper | 2 Feb 2004 09:23
Picon
Favicon

Use local disk as root partition?

Hi,
  Suppose you have a PC you want to use as an X-Terminal, and suppose it
has a local disk. Now suppose you want to use that disk to optimize the 
system.
The first thing to do is, to use the disk to do the initial boot (after 
which the kernel
is loaded over the network). The second thing to do is to use part of the
disk as a swappartition (Done!).

The next thing you MAY want to do is reduce network traffic (will it 
...?) to the
X-Terminal by using a local partition as it's root. Would this reduce 
network traffic
(seriously)? If so, it's worthwhile investigating on how to do this. I 
would imagine
it to make sense to have the X-Terminal (during boot) synchronise it's 
local root
filesystem with the root file system available on the server. This may 
require
some changes in the initrd of the network kernel. First question though 
.. would it
be worthwhile in terms of reducted network traffic. After all, all the 
X-Terminal
does is run X.

Cheers,
  Erik

-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
(Continue reading)

Neil Stone | 2 Feb 2004 10:42
Picon

Re: FIXED! Slow menus with Open Office 1.1 on v4.


Kevin Valentine wrote:
| On 2004.01.14 18:37 Todd Shoemaker wrote:
|
| [snip]
|
|> So basically, I copied the xkb folder from my LTSP3 tree into the
|> LTSP4 tree, restarted my X session (ctrl-alt-backspace) and
|> StarOffice7 and OOo 1.1 menus work flawlessly.
|>
|> Thanks for the hint!  Here are the steps to replicate (as root on the
|> server), assuming you have v3 installed in /opt/ltsp3:
|>
|> cd /opt/ltsp4/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11
|> mv xkb xkb.old
|> cp -R /opt/ltsp3/i386/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb xkb
|>
|> Restart and give it a shot.  I haven't fully figured out what the
|> problem is with this dir.  My XFree86 is a custom 4.3.0 build straight
|> off of xfree86.org, and it was in the same condition as the 4.2.99
|> shipped with LTSP4: an empty xkb directory with only a symlink inside
|> it to /usr/X11R6/bin/xkbcomp.
|
|
| Ok, so I finally tried it. It works on my K12LTSP-4 server! I didn't see
| anyone respond with successes so I thought it would be nice to add mine.
| BTW, thanks for the information. Haven't tried it on my Slack server
| yet... Should this be added to the errata page on ltsp.org?
|
| Also, I'm not too familiar with Fedora (or Redhat) yet so excuse me if I
(Continue reading)

Bryn Salisbury | 2 Feb 2004 11:05
Picon
Favicon

Re: LTSP4 and Local Applications

jam@... wrote:
<snip>

>>As far as I can see from the configuration files, Local Apps are enabled
>>and all the necessary libraries and binaries have been copied to the
>>appropriate directories. Yet it continues to give errors when trying to
>>connect to the X-server.
> 
> 
> First thing to do is tell us what those errors are.
> 
> Then, we can begin to help you.
> 

Right...

The errors are:

[brs@... brs]$ ssh ws001 env DISPLAY=:0.0 
/usr/share/MozillaFirebird/MozillaFirebird

Xlib: connection to ":0.0" refused by server
Xlib: No protocol specified

Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0

Which then takes me back to the command promt, when I try to do the same 
without the "env" options, it gives the following:

[brs@... brs]$ ssh ws001 /usr/share/MozillaFirebird/MozillaFirebird
(Continue reading)

Bryn Salisbury | 2 Feb 2004 11:22
Picon
Favicon

Re: LTSP4 and Local Applications

Almost forgot...

Feb  2 10:01:17 ogtux ypserv[18080]: refused connect from 172.0.0.3:918 
to procedure ypproc_all (ltsp,group.byname;-4)

taken from /var/log/messages

Thanks Again

Bryn

--

-- 
Bryn Salisbury
Uned Cyfrifiaduron - Computer Unit
Llyfrgell Genedlaethol Cymru - National Library of Wales
bryn.salisbury@...

Yn siarad drosof fy hun, nid LlGC   -  Speaking personally, not for NLW

-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

(Continue reading)

David Mummery | 2 Feb 2004 12:36
Picon

Re: LTSP & Upgrade from RH8 to Fedora?

David - 

I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately those above did not see the same requirement.

Ended up building a replica of our existing setup on the Athlon with Fedora and tested all apps. Put this
aside as a standby replacement, then upgraded production server. Had to play the game that 'If you want it
done this way, I can't guarantee any form of success.'

All my CUPS printer settings were completely screwed by the upgrade, but salvageable. Those above who
complained about the printing issues had to suffer in silence. Or perhaps I just didn't hear them.

And yes, I was sweating as each (fully tested) Fedora disk went in.

David

On Jan 30, 2004 4:16 PM, David Johnston <david@...> wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 07:26, David Mummery wrote: 
> > Hi all. 
> > We've been running RH8 and LTSP-3 successfully for about a year and 
> > want to upgrade to Fedora-Core-1 and LTSP-4. The RH* - Fedora upgrade 
> > has to be done using the CD's as our internet pipe is just too thin 
> > to allow a reasonable download window. 
> >  
> > I can't see many major gripes in doing this, but has anyone on the list 
> > tried a similar upgrade with or without success? 
> >  
> > Unfortunately can't replicate our production network properly 
> > because we run on a dual processor Fujitsu server...doesn't quite 
> >  match my Athlon 700 :( 
(Continue reading)


Gmane