1 Jan 2006 18:52
Re: AsRock, the 3rd
Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore <at> gmx.de>
2006-01-01 17:52:48 GMT
2006-01-01 17:52:48 GMT
> Hmmm... Interesting. Thanks for that information. My boss actually
> wanted to buy ASRock-based servers the other day ("Hey, that's cheap!").
Well, maybe you should let him buy them so he learns the hard way that
"cheap" means "crud".
(BTW since when does Asrock make server boards? Who would buy an Asrock board
for a mission critical production system? Apart from your boss (who is in
dire need for proper IT consulting.))
snip
>
> Well, I have heard VIA chipsets actually work well... As long as
> they are used with a VIA mobo, and a VIA CPU, such as the C5. I
> have some good experience with VIA chipsets in the past, but I do
> agree their reputation is spotty, to say the least.
Thing is, VIAs chipset drivers for Windows straighten out most flaws in their
chips. With Linux you get what the kernel hackers were able to dig up, and
for some Distros they provide kernel patches, I think. Could be precompiled
kernel modules as well, not sure here. So - maybe since kt266a situation
might have lightened a bit, still I'd favor intel or nForce.
And consumer leftovers don't belong in a server. You need a server - buy
server hardware. What you save in consumer hardware you'll loose twice in the
long run in servicing burnt-out machines and compensating data loss etc.
RSS Feed