1 Oct 2005 13:56
Re: Running Slack from CF-IDE adaptor
Edenyard <mail <at> edenyard.co.uk>
2005-10-01 11:56:30 GMT
2005-10-01 11:56:30 GMT
Armando Vega <synan <at> rilinux.hr> wrote: > You are aware thet cf cards have limited I/O cycles, and that slack has > excessive logging that will eat up those cycles in like an hour or so? Slack shouldn't do any logging (or any other writing) at all to the CF if it's mounted read-only, should it? That's the plan, anyway, which should also mean that it doesn't ming losing power without being unmounted and also it won't do a time-consuming file-system check every time it boots. Quick booting is another of my criteria. Cowboy <curt <at> spam-o-matic.net> wrote: > Trending in the direction of an embedded system ? > You don't need 1 gig flash. What's available today is enough, but you > will need lots of RAM ! > You *could* run a SLAX system from flash now. > Like SLAX, you could also roll your own. > BOOT from the flash, but run entirely from RAM, just like the CD systems, > such as SLAX ( based on Slackware 10.1 last I looked ) Yes! Embedded is really what I want, except that it seemed more cost-effective to use a standard desktop-PC motherboard and other parts. Size isn't critical but quick booting, resilience to power removal and reliable unattended operation all are. I suppose that the thing I most want to know is how fast the PC will boot with CF as the storage medium. I've heard that they're VERY slow but I don't know whether that's a reliable opinion.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed