1 Jun 2005 22:19
Re: [Patch] createrepo --check option take two
Hans-Peter Jansen <hpj <at> urpla.net>
2005-06-01 20:19:20 GMT
2005-06-01 20:19:20 GMT
Am Donnerstag, 26. Mai 2005 06:03 schrieb seth vidal: > On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 12:07 +0200, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > Hi Seth, > > > > Here's a slightly reworked version of the --check option, it now > > checks the directory timestamp, containing the rpm, as it happened, > > that an older rpm appeared today in one of my rsyned suse update > > repos (due to some internal lags), which didn't triggered the > > rebuild, then.. > > > > As a nice plus, the number of stats are greatly decreased, if a dir > > in the repo is not up to date (not that it matters, compared to the > > following repo rebuild...). > > > > Do you think, it's worth to include it upstream now? > > quite possibly, yes. than please commit the attached patch on top of the previous. It fixes a problem, when the rpm files are in the current directory. That results in os.path.dirname() returning an empty string, which os.path.getmtime() doesn't like(Continue reading). > There are some other things I'd like to see done to the > format/program as well: > 1. make the checksum be an internal package checksum and/or store a > cache of package checksums and rebuild based on timestamp change (for > quicker re-indexing of a repo) Will need to take a deeper look into things to grok this.
.
> There are some other things I'd like to see done to the
> format/program as well:
> 1. make the checksum be an internal package checksum and/or store a
> cache of package checksums and rebuild based on timestamp change (for
> quicker re-indexing of a repo)
Will need to take a deeper look into things to grok this.
RSS Feed