1 Dec 2007 01:01
Re: RedHat Cluster Suite as a replacement for linux-ha?
On 30/11/2007, Noam Meltzer <tsnoam@...> wrote: > Hi, > > I had some experience with RHCS. Personally, it will be one of my last > choices for a good opensource HA software. (linux-ha first, actually) That's what I tried - but at least the packages on my test systems just crash and burn even running a simple "stonith -h" or "BasicSanityCheck". > It is very lacking in the area of Ethernet heartbeats (allows only one!) and What do you mean by "allows only one"? > Anyhow, RHCS does have one good point which will make it the first OSS > candidate on certain scenarios which is GFS. Well - can't you configure GFS without it? Also - I got the impression the OCFS is more recommanended by users on the net, but it doesn't come as a CentOS package - is it worth the trouble to install? > There is much more into it, but in order to give more information I would > need more information about your application and its architecture. The main application just updates a SQLite file a lot. All we want is to have a stand-by node to take over and keep providing network service (reading and updating the file) if/when the primary node goes down. For this we share the file on DRBD but of course we need(Continue reading)
RSS Feed