1 Apr 2009 01:11
[Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files
<bugzilla <at> redhat.com>
2009-03-31 23:11:21 GMT
2009-03-31 23:11:21 GMT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart <at> gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kwizart <at> gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart <at> gmail.com> 2009-03-31 19:11:18 EDT --- There is no reviewer at this time, so there I've no one to talk to. The spec if readable as it is: -doc are disabled because they are rundantant. (That's written within the spec file already). -Patching libtool remains needed as prevention to rpath, they is no need to disable. -zlib 1.2.3 remains documented as future introduction to EL-5 branch. (strangely, some wants more spec's comments, others want important comment's removed) I agree to change some trivial issue with default_patch_fuzz removed, libmatio > matio in desc, and typo in Group of the test sub-package. Futhermore one patch was adopted upstream. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2507202&group_id=176643&atid=878064(Continue reading)
RSS Feed