bugzilla | 1 Mar 03:26 2008
Picon

[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511

------- Additional Comments From konrad <at> tylerc.org  2008-02-29 21:26 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, perhaps for packaging issues this is almost okay,
> however:
> 
> - To make it sure that this package can be rebuilt from open
>   sources really, first please remove all pre-rebuilt binaries
>   (like .jar) at %prep.

Ok. This will take me a bit of time to get worked out.

> - In the review we have to check the licenses of all codes in the
>   tarball to make it sure that the codes used for jruby are used
>   with keeping legal compatibility.
> 
>   Would you write the summary about what licenses are used in
>   what files in the tarball so that we can check legal issues
>   easily?

Sure.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Mar 06:12 2008
Picon

[Bug 253570] Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570

tibbs <at> math.uh.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody <at> fedoraproject.org    |tibbs <at> math.uh.edu
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+

------- Additional Comments From tibbs <at> math.uh.edu  2008-03-01 00:12 EST -------
Builds fine now.  rpmlint says:
  ocaml-camlp5.src:47: E: configure-without-libdir-spec
but this isn't an autoconf-generated configure script, so libdir would be
pointless here.

* source files match upstream:
   6c2f4f7a9d28168a6548b396edc2cc8e37c3f33b5db065a71f00013f95ddadcf  
   camlp5-5.08.tgz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* ocaml guidelines are followed
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Mar 09:30 2008
Picon

[Bug 428718] Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: pysvn - Python bindings for Subversion

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428718

mtasaka <at> ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dradez <at> redhat.com

------- Additional Comments From mtasaka <at> ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-03-01 03:30 EST -------
*** Bug 433863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla | 1 Mar 09:30 2008
Picon

[Bug 433863] Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: python-pysvn - Python SVN Library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433863

mtasaka <at> ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

------- Additional Comments From mtasaka <at> ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-03-01 03:30 EST -------
Oh, no...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 428718 ***

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla | 1 Mar 09:44 2008
Picon

[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511

------- Additional Comments From konrad <at> tylerc.org  2008-03-01 03:44 EST -------
The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a 
large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java 
packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't 
get in for quite a while because of this.

But here's the shopping list:

* asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1)
* emma (we don't have this at all yet)
* jarjar (we don't have this either)
* jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94)
* jna (we don't have it at all)
* joda-time (we don't have it at all)
* joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it)
* junit (we have this one! phew!)
* retroweaver (we don't have this at all either)

So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we 
can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :).

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Mar 10:09 2008
Picon

[Bug 417511] Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511

------- Additional Comments From mtasaka <at> ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp  2008-03-01 04:09 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a 
> large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java 
> packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't 
> get in for quite a while because of this.
> 
> But here's the shopping list:
> 
> * asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1)
> * emma (we don't have this at all yet)
> * jarjar (we don't have this either)
> * jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94)
> * jna (we don't have it at all)
> * joda-time (we don't have it at all)
> * joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it)
> * junit (we have this one! phew!)
> * retroweaver (we don't have this at all either)
> 
> So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we 
> can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :).

Thank you for investigating BR. This list is very useful
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Mar 10:27 2008
Picon

[Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531

------- Additional Comments From updates <at> fedoraproject.org  2008-03-01 04:27 EST -------
kitsune-2.0-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla | 1 Mar 10:25 2008
Picon

[Bug 412531] Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Kitsune - Mathematical game

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=412531

------- Additional Comments From updates <at> fedoraproject.org  2008-03-01 04:25 EST -------
kitsune-2.0-3.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla | 1 Mar 10:27 2008
Picon

[Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890

------- Additional Comments From updates <at> fedoraproject.org  2008-03-01 04:27 EST -------
LinLog-0.3-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
bugzilla | 1 Mar 10:27 2008
Picon

[Bug 434890] Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: LinLog - A ham radio logbook for linux

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434890

------- Additional Comments From updates <at> fedoraproject.org  2008-03-01 04:27 EST -------
LinLog-0.3-4.fc7 has been pushed to the Fedora 7 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Gmane