bugzilla | 1 Feb 2011 09:24
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 674259] New: perl-Inline-Files-0.64 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: perl-Inline-Files-0.64 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674259

           Summary: perl-Inline-Files-0.64 is available
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: Unspecified
        OS/Version: Unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
          Severity: unspecified
          Priority: unspecified
         Component: perl-Inline-Files
        AssignedTo: mmaslano <at> redhat.com
        ReportedBy: upstream-release-monitoring <at> fedoraproject.org
         QAContact: extras-qa <at> fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-list <at> redhat.com, mmaslano <at> redhat.com
    Classification: Fedora

Latest upstream release: 0.64
Current version in Fedora Rawhide: 0.63
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Inline-Files/

Please consult the package update guidelines before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_guidelines

(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Feb 2011 10:09
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 674259] perl-Inline-Files-0.64 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674259

Petr Pisar <ppisar <at> redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|mmaslano <at> redhat.com         |ppisar <at> redhat.com
         AssignedTo|mmaslano <at> redhat.com         |ppisar <at> redhat.com

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Petr Pisar | 1 Feb 2011 10:19
Favicon

File Inline-Files-0.64.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Inline-Files:

d777282872ecc642033ca01fffed8f73  Inline-Files-0.64.tar.gz
Petr Pisar | 1 Feb 2011 10:41
Favicon

[perl-Inline-Files] 0.64 bump

commit d0016ad7b8d76e3ac2ef2cd47b0107e064d3f691
Author: Petr Písař <ppisar <at> redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 1 10:19:08 2011 +0100

    0.64 bump

    And some spec file clean-ups.

 .gitignore             |    1 +
 perl-Inline-Files.spec |   29 ++++++++++-------------------
 sources                |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 17d333b..871df7b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
 <at>  <at>  -1 +1,2  <at>  <at> 
 Inline-Files-0.63.tar.gz
+/Inline-Files-0.64.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Inline-Files.spec b/perl-Inline-Files.spec
index 04adbc2..6534707 100644
--- a/perl-Inline-Files.spec
+++ b/perl-Inline-Files.spec
 <at>  <at>  -1,17 +1,14  <at>  <at> 
 Name:           perl-Inline-Files
-Version:        0.63
-Release:        2%{?dist}
+Version:        0.64
+Release:        1%{?dist}
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Feb 2011 10:49
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 674259] perl-Inline-Files-0.64 is available

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674259

Petr Pisar <ppisar <at> redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |perl-Inline-Files-0.64-1.fc
                   |                            |15
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE
        Last Closed|                            |2011-02-01 04:49:17

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Marcela Mašláňová | 1 Feb 2011 14:32
Favicon

[perl-Mail-MboxParser/el5/master] Initial push into el5.

commit f49cff2502f763ba6a49320673748cb2edc77eaa
Author: Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano <at> redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 1 14:31:42 2011 +0100

    Initial push into el5.

 .gitignore |    1 +
 sources    |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..b07dc84 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
 <at>  <at>  -0,0 +1  <at>  <at> 
+/Mail-MboxParser-0.55.tar.gz
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..079f95f 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
 <at>  <at>  -0,0 +1  <at>  <at> 
+1b9fdb367db36ec94e7b5c6721f11221  Mail-MboxParser-0.55.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
buildsys | 1 Feb 2011 14:16
Favicon

Broken dependencies: perl-RPM2


perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
	perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.1()(64bit)
	perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit)
On i386:
	perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.i686 requires librpm.so.1
	perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.i686 requires librpmio.so.1
Please resolve this as soon as possible.

Marcela Mašláňová | 1 Feb 2011 14:36
Favicon

[perl-Mail-MboxParser/el5/master] Upload specfile.

commit 3a393e2d8fa796988b5e123cb19ce8db16663bfa
Author: Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano <at> redhat.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 1 14:35:45 2011 +0100

    Upload specfile.

 perl-Mail-MboxParser.spec |   59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mail-MboxParser.spec b/perl-Mail-MboxParser.spec
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..96575fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Mail-MboxParser.spec
 <at>  <at>  -0,0 +1,59  <at>  <at> 
+%{!?perl_vendorlib: %define perl_vendorlib %(eval "`%{__perl} -V:installvendorlib`"; echo $installvendorlib)}
+
+Name:           perl-Mail-MboxParser
+Version:        0.55
+Release:        2%{?dist}
+Summary:        Read-only access to UNIX-mailboxes
+License:        GPL+ or Artistic
+Group:          Development/Libraries
+URL:            http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-MboxParser/
+Source0:        http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/V/VP/VPARSEVAL/Mail-MboxParser-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildRoot:      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+
+BuildArch:      noarch
+BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires:  perl(MIME::Tools) >= 5
(Continue reading)

bugzilla | 1 Feb 2011 16:04
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 671445] [PATCH] specfile accords to new packaging guidelines

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671445

--- Comment #3 from Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano <at> redhat.com> 2011-02-01 10:04:03 EST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created attachment 475924 [details]
> incremental support for older RHEL releases
> 
> I liked Steve's suggestion on the list: extend the existing --old option to
> support "old" and "older" conventions by making it cumulative. That's how my
> own ~/bin/cpanspec is working. I'd meant to clean it up and submit it a while
> back but never got around to it.
> 
> The attached patch will allow cpanspec to generate specs suitable for f13+ (and
> el6) by default; using --old will generate specs suitable for older fedora and
> el4/5; using --old --old generates specs for antique distributions (as the
> current --old option does).

Nice, your patch looks good. I've tested it.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
(Continue reading)

Ralf Corsepius | 1 Feb 2011 17:09
Picon
Favicon

Re: perl <at> INC (paths) again

On 01/31/2011 04:36 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/31/2011 04:21 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> Hello,
>> because some questions and blocked reviews [1]. I feel that we really
>> need discuss our  <at> INC paths once again.
>
> Thanks for trying to launch such a discussion.
>
> I am blocking these reviews, because I feel redhat.cz has drawn
> uncommunicated, arguable and questionable decisions, which are at risk
> of to run down Fedora's perl.
>
>> This is only proposal and there are also other possibilities, how to
>> create specific directory for installation of users rpms. I'd like to
>> change this proposal to FPC guidelines maybe for next Fedora, therefore
>> I really like to know your opinions.
>
> I promise to read it in depth and to think about it, but I won't have
> much time this week.

Marcela, what are we supposed to think of the fact you are continuing to 
accept packages which do not install into vendor_dir?

I interpret these actions of yours, as you not being interested in 
settling the issues, but you wanting to implement facts by brute-force.

This is not helpful.

--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
(Continue reading)


Gmane