headers
bugzilla | 1 May 2007 18:36
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 238581] New: careless use of gethostbyname() in Socket.xs

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238581

           Summary: careless use of gethostbyname() in Socket.xs
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: fc5
          Platform: All
               URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=42844
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: low
          Priority: medium
         Component: perl
        AssignedTo: rnorwood <at> redhat.com
        ReportedBy: peak <at> argo.troja.mff.cuni.cz
         QAContact: dkl <at> redhat.com
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-list <at> redhat.com

Description of problem:
Socket::inet_aton() does not the length of data returned by gethostbyname()
before copying it. See the link to PerlBug for details.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.8.8-4 (other versions are affected as well)

How reproducible:
Easily when you LD_PRELOAD a broken implementation of gethostbyname(). :)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
bugzilla | 1 May 2007 23:14
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 237594] Upgrade to SVK 2.0.1

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Upgrade to SVK 2.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237594

dearfrankg <at> gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dearfrankg <at> gmail.com

------- Additional Comments From dearfrankg <at> gmail.com  2007-05-01 17:13 EST -------
I would like to get this rpm into FC6 also.
Thanks 

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dave Cross | 2 May 2007 17:23
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Catalyst / DBIx::Class / SQL::Translator


Last September there was some talk on this about getting Catalyst (and 
therefore DBIx::Class and SQL::Translator) into Extras.

Was there any progress on this? And if people are help up through lack 
of resources, is there anything I can do to help?

Cheers,

Dave...
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Chris Weyl | 2 May 2007 17:48
Gravatar

Re: Catalyst / DBIx::Class / SQL::Translator

On 5/2/07, Dave Cross <dave <at> dave.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Last September there was some talk on this about getting Catalyst (and
> therefore DBIx::Class and SQL::Translator) into Extras.
>
> Was there any progress on this? And if people are help up through lack
> of resources, is there anything I can do to help?

Hey Dave --

I've been working on getting the "base" Catalyst framework into extras
over the last couple weeks or so.  Right now, it's just a matter of
Catalyst-Devel and Catalyst-Runtime (and all their deps), you can find
the review bugs all under Catalyst-Devel's dependency tree:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=238238

Certainly reviews will help get these base modules in; if there are
additional Catalyst modules you'd like to see in Fedora (e.g. perhaps
Task::Catalyst::Tutorial? <grin>) just make sure they're marked as
depending on Catalyst-Runtime (bug 238211).  That way they'll show up
in the dependency tree there as well...

                                -Chris
--

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ralf Corsepius | 2 May 2007 17:47
Picon
Favicon

Re: Catalyst / DBIx::Class / SQL::Translator

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 16:23 +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
> Last September there was some talk on this about getting Catalyst (and 
> therefore DBIx::Class and SQL::Translator) into Extras.
> 
> Was there any progress on this? And if people are help up through lack 
> of resources, is there anything I can do to help?
Check out bugzilla. Chris Weyl has been busy committing review requests,
several of them still awaiting review (hint!)

Ralf
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
bugzilla | 5 May 2007 00:50
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 237594] Upgrade to SVK 2.0.1

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Upgrade to SVK 2.0.1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237594

Bug 237594 depends on bug 232018, which changed state.

Bug 232018 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-Syck - Fast, lightweight YAML loader and dumper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232018

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Weyl | 5 May 2007 01:04
Gravatar

Catalyst status...

So we're making good progress with the base Catalyst packages:  all of
the packages Catalyst::Runtime depends on have been reviewed and have
been imported/built; in addition to Catalyst::Runtime, there are three
other packages which need to be reviewed before Catalyst::Devel can
be.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=238238

Beyond that, I suspect the next course of action would be to package
up the outstanding deps for Task::Catalyst::Tutorial...  I've put the
output of this distro's deps (from my hacked version of cpanspec) up
at: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/Catalyst.

If anyone wants to help (*cough* recent emails *cough*), reviews are
always good; packaging up parts of Task::Catalyst::Tutorial and
submitting them would also be good (as I can help with reviews then).

Anyways, enjoy :)
                                       -Chris
--

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Weyl | 5 May 2007 01:12
Gravatar

Re: Test::Pod::Coverage tests...

On 4/27/07, Chris Weyl <cweyl <at> alumni.drew.edu> wrote:
> My opinion is that we ought to not mandate the use of Pod coverage
> tests, simply because for our purposes it doesn't really matter what
> their result is.  If they're present, we should conditionalize the
> tests (e.g. %_with_pod_tests magic or some such), but not insist on
> them by default.

So, to follow up to myself here, given the lack of comments I'm
inclined to approve 237883 without insisting on Test::Pod::Coverage
due to T::P::C not testing the _functionality_ of the package.  One
last chance to scream :)

                                 -Chris
--

-- 
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
bugzilla | 5 May 2007 01:30
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 239118] New: perl-YAML-Syck fails to build due to missing perl-Devel-Leak in ppc64

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239118

           Summary: perl-YAML-Syck fails to build due to missing perl-Devel-
                    Leak in ppc64
           Product: Fedora Extras
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: perl-YAML-Syck
        AssignedTo: steve <at> silug.org
        ReportedBy: cweyl <at> alumni.drew.edu
         QAContact: extras-qa <at> fedoraproject.org
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-list <at> redhat.com

Tracker bug blocking PPC64MissingDeps, as detailed on fedora-maintainers.

perl-YAML-Syck fails to build in devel due to a missing dep on perl-Devel-Leak.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
bugzilla | 5 May 2007 01:30
Picon
Favicon

[Bug 238907] PPC64 builds fail due to missing deps

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: PPC64 builds fail due to missing deps
Alias: PPC64MissingDeps

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238907

cweyl <at> alumni.drew.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |239118

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane