Rawhide: perl modules to update (2006-07-01)

Jason,

New month, new report and two more perl modules to update
(DBI and DBD::MySQL).

jpo
-- 
José Pedro Oliveira
* mailto: jpo <at> di.uminho.pt * http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo *
* gpg fingerprint = F9B6 8D87 859D 1C94 48F0 84C0 9749 9EB5 91BD 851B *

Distro  : Fedora Core Development
Date    : Sat Jul  1 13:19:17 2006
Number of perl-* modules: 46

Updates
Fedora Core Development        CPAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DBD-MySQL-3.0004               (DBD-mysql-3.0006.tar.gz)
DBI-1.50                       (DBI-1.51.tar.gz)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Licenses
----------------------------------------------------------------------
     2  Artistic
     1  Artistic or GPL
     2  Distributable
     1  GPL

[Bug 198081] New: spamd is SO slow

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081

           Summary: spamd is SO slow
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: fc5
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: spamassassin
        AssignedTo: wtogami <at> redhat.com
        ReportedBy: redhat <at> nodata.co.uk
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-
                    list <at> redhat.com,felicity <at> kluge.net,jm <at> jmason.org,parkerm
                     <at> pobox.com,reg+redhat <at> sidney.com,wtogami <at> redhat.com

downloading e-mail with evolution is REALLY slow.
It takes about two minutes over a fast line to download 150 e-mails.

top shows spamd hogging the cpu.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 198081] spamd is SO slow

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: spamd is SO slow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081

wtogami <at> redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO_REPORTER

------- Additional Comments From wtogami <at> redhat.com  2006-07-09 21:15 EST -------
This is not enough information to possibly diagnose the problem.

Are you having long DNS timeouts by chance?

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 198081] spamd is SO slow

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: spamd is SO slow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081

redhat <at> nodata.co.uk changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER           |ASSIGNED

------- Additional Comments From redhat <at> nodata.co.uk  2006-07-10 02:23 EST -------
I doubt it, but I'll check.

In the meantime:
Time to download 100 test e-mails without spamd: about 1 second.
With spamd: about 10 seconds.

Each mail seems to be passed to spamd before the next one is downloaded, which
is a bit bizarre.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 198081] spamd is SO slow

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: spamd is SO slow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081

------- Additional Comments From kanarip <at> kanarip.com  2006-07-10 07:18 EST -------
Wouldn't you consider this undesirable behaviour by evolution, instead of
unsuspected behaviour by spamassassin?

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 198081] spamd is SO slow

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: spamd is SO slow

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081

------- Additional Comments From redhat <at> nodata.co.uk  2006-07-10 07:59 EST -------
Good point, yes, but it was more of a side comment.

spamd is still hogging the cpu, the db is only ten megs.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 137202] getXXXent functions blow up after recursing

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: getXXXent functions blow up after recursing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=137202

mattdm <at> mattdm.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |NEEDINFO
                 CC|                            |mattdm <at> mattdm.org

------- Additional Comments From mattdm <at> mattdm.org  2006-07-10 17:00 EST -------
Fedora Core 3 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security
updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and
reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and
hasn't been resolved in the current FC5 updates or in the FC6 test
release, reopen and change the version to match.

Thank you!

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 147465] XML::XQL not taint-safe by default and warnings if $ENV{TERM} unset.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: XML::XQL not taint-safe by default and warnings if $ENV{TERM} unset.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=147465

mattdm <at> mattdm.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |NEEDINFO
                 CC|                            |mattdm <at> mattdm.org

------- Additional Comments From mattdm <at> mattdm.org  2006-07-10 18:17 EST -------
Fedora Core 3 is now maintained by the Fedora Legacy project for security
updates only. If this problem is a security issue, please reopen and
reassign to the Fedora Legacy product. If it is not a security issue and
hasn't been resolved in the current FC5 updates or in the FC6 test
release, reopen and change the version to match.

Thank you!

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

[Bug 198399] New: Package perl lacks IPv6 support

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198399

           Summary: Package perl lacks IPv6 support
           Product: Fedora Core
           Version: devel
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: normal
         Component: perl
        AssignedTo: jvdias <at> redhat.com
        ReportedBy: pvrabec <at> redhat.com
         QAContact: dkl <at> redhat.com
                CC: fedora-perl-devel-list <at> redhat.com,mbacovsk <at> redhat.com

This bug was reported automaticaly in connection with IPv6 project.
Our aim is to support IPv6 in all Fedora Core packages so FC6 and RHEL5 will be ready for IPv6.
			
This package seems to lack IPv6 support as is illustrated in attached log.
	
Here follows part of scanning log (grep -r F_INET *)/up to 30 lines: 

/perl-5.8.8/pp_sys.c:2369:#if defined (HAS_SOCKETPAIR) || (defined (HAS_SOCKET) &&
defined(SOCK_DGRAM) && defined(AF_INET) && defined(PF_INET))
/perl-5.8.8/pp_sys.c:2742:	    if (((struct sockaddr *)SvPVX_const(sv))->sa_family == AF_INET &&
/perl-5.8.8/vms/sockadapt.c:122:  if (addr->sa_family == AF_INET &&

[Bug 198399] Package perl lacks IPv6 support

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Package perl lacks IPv6 support

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198399

dwmw2 <at> redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|                            |195271
              nThis|                            |

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.