Re: maven...

On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 16:27 -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> By biggest worry is ppc. Last time it was tried, there were failures
> specific to ppc. While it can be exclude arch'd, I would really like to
> avoid doing that.
> 
> Here is the ppc bug for the record:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239123

I went rushing to check on that... and then realised you meant ppc64,
not ppc. We keep the ppc ExcludeArch list fairly much empty, but ppc64
userspace is less of a priority (since we actually run everything 32-bit
even on ppc64 hardware, unless there's some real _benefit_ to using
64-bit userspace).

I had a brief look, but even with bootstrap mode enabled it seems to
require maven-* packages which aren't available.

If you need an account on a suitable machine to poke at this, let me
have a SSH public key.

--

-- 
dwmw2

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

bodhi: Adding "new package"

Hi,

I am facing a problem with bodhi's usability:

The problem: I have rebuilt a larger number packages for fc7 and want to
push them as updates. The current "new package" field however requires
maintainers to remember all package details of package they might have
pending. I.e. unless a maintainer carefully keeps book of koji-builds,
he will loose oversight.

Also, the "package name expansion magic" currently being used doesn't
help me much. It almost never returns results suitable for me (most of
my rebuilt packages are perl modules. Inserting "perl" or "perl-*"
doesn't help at all).

Can we please have a better method to insert packages to "new updates"?

Or even better: Can we have some sort of "browser" in bodhi, which
contains all "koji-built and yet unreleased packages"?

Ralf

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: bodhi: Adding "new package"

On Saturday 01 September 2007 06:10:19 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Can we please have a better method to insert packages to "new updates"?
>
> Or even better: Can we have some sort of "browser" in bodhi, which
> contains all "koji-built and yet unreleased packages"?

 +1

  This could have some kind of filter, like the release. This would be even 
better.

> Ralf

--

-- 
José Abílio

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: tor security updates

Luke Macken <lmacken <at> redhat.com> writes:

> Hrm?  Bodhi should be able to work fine without javascript.  It only
> uses it for some shiny stuffy, such as the auto-completion list, and
> some menus.  The *icon* to the right of the package name is not a
> button, it's a spinner that becomes active when it is building the
> list of builds after typing in the name of a package.  If you don't
> have javascript enabled, then simply type the full name of the build
> in the package field.

??? What have I to enter in the "Package" field? The name of the package
(rpm -qf '%{NAME}') or the name of the build (full NEVR)?

Named auto-completion does not seem to work (javascript is enabled).
E.g. 't<TAB>' moves to "Release:" field, but does not do anything with
the spinner or fills.

Why have I to create this update request manually at all? As it seems,
it is just a corpse in a database and does not hit any repository. It
can be created automatically by koji when build succeeded.  Currently, I
have to remember every succeeded build.

> Only the submitter of each update (or releng) will have the ability to
> perform actions against an update, aside from commenting.

Then, something seems to be wrong with my acls; I can only add comments.

Enrico

Re: tor security updates

On Saturday 01 September 2007 09:30:17 Enrico Scholz wrote:
> Luke Macken <lmacken <at> redhat.com> writes:
> > Hrm?  Bodhi should be able to work fine without javascript.  It only
> > uses it for some shiny stuffy, such as the auto-completion list, and
> > some menus.  The *icon* to the right of the package name is not a
> > button, it's a spinner that becomes active when it is building the
> > list of builds after typing in the name of a package.  If you don't
> > have javascript enabled, then simply type the full name of the build
> > in the package field.
>
> ??? What have I to enter in the "Package" field? The name of the package
> (rpm -qf '%{NAME}') or the name of the build (full NEVR)?

  Full nevr.

> Named auto-completion does not seem to work (javascript is enabled).
> E.g. 't<TAB>' moves to "Release:" field, but does not do anything with
> the spinner or fills.

  I only see results when I have most of the name completed.

> Enrico

--

-- 
José Abílio

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: tor security updates

On Sat, 1 Sep 2007 10:00:30 +0100, José Matos wrote:

> > > Hrm?  Bodhi should be able to work fine without javascript.  It only
> > > uses it for some shiny stuffy, such as the auto-completion list, and
> > > some menus.  The *icon* to the right of the package name is not a
> > > button, it's a spinner that becomes active when it is building the
> > > list of builds after typing in the name of a package.  If you don't
> > > have javascript enabled, then simply type the full name of the build
> > > in the package field.
> >
> > ??? What have I to enter in the "Package" field? The name of the package
> > (rpm -qf '%{NAME}') or the name of the build (full NEVR)?
> 
>   Full nevr.

src.rpm %{name} should suffice, because then the spinner gets active
and you can choose from the available builds in the list-box.

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: bodhi: Adding "new package"

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: bodhi: Adding "new package"

Tim Lauridsen wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
>> On Saturday 01 September 2007 06:10:19 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>  
>>> Can we please have a better method to insert packages to "new updates"?
>>>
>>> Or even better: Can we have some sort of "browser" in bodhi, which
>>> contains all "koji-built and yet unreleased packages"?
>>>     
>>
>>  +1
>>
>>   This could have some kind of filter, like the release. This would 
>> be even better.
>>
>>  
>>> Ralf
>>>     
>>
>>   
> What about a button inside a koji packages to add the the package as a 
> uddate i body.
>

You guys all know better then to post this to the list -

https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/bodhi/

    -Mike

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: bodhi: Adding "new package"

On Saturday 01 September 2007 17:09:22 Mike McGrath wrote:
> Tim Lauridsen wrote:

> > What about a button inside a koji packages to add the the package as a
> > uddate i body.
>
> You guys all know better then to post this to the list -
>
> https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/bodhi/

Three monts too late:

https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/bodhi/ticket/36

Regards,
Till

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers

Re: Wiki discussions

Once upon a time seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 21:45 +0200, Roland Wolters wrote:
> > where is the appropriate place to discuss pages in the wiki? I often come
> > across pages where I miss important information or where I would like to
> > mention an issue or two and I always fail to do so due to the fact that
> > there is no separate discussion page (as for example the MediaWiki engine
> > provides).
> > However, with the current Wiki configuration (and as someone who is used
> > to MediaWiki I already have enough problems with MoinMoin-like Wikis)
> > this is not possible. So what to do?
>
> It's possible to add discussion pages to a moin page. There's even a faq
> about it at moin. Check it out.
>
Actually the FAQ says that there is no easy way [1], at least compared to 
other wiki engines like MediaWiki.
You can create templates or modify the source code, and of course you can 
create extra links. But that was definitely not what I was looking for.

Still, thanks for the answer.

Roland

[1]
http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/MoinMoinQuestions#head-2dbcebd0bb6fb8205a3ede0950058fb60129ddd4

--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers