Hi, Do anyone knows any contact person for openfontlibrary project who can help to re-upload and make old links active for some fonts? Parag. _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
> Hi, > Do anyone knows any contact person for openfontlibrary project who > can help to re-upload and make old links active for some fonts? > > Parag. Dave Crossland - email address is his first name at lab6.com. _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Hi Paul, On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Paul Flo Williams <paul@...> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Do anyone knows any contact person for openfontlibrary project who >> can help to re-upload and make old links active for some fonts? >> >> Parag. > > Dave Crossland - email address is his first name at lab6.com. > > > Thanks. Parag. _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Hi Parag! 2010/7/14 Parag N(पराग़) <panemade <at> gmail.com>: > > Do anyone knows any contact person for openfontlibrary project who > can help to re-upload and make old links active for some fonts? I did get your email from a few days ago. Sorry for not replying sooner. Simple fix: add this line to /etc/hosts 140.211.166.148 openfontlibrary.org www.openfontlibrary.org and then visit openfontlibrary.org :) We will bring across all the old fonts and set up 403 redirections, and if you want to help with that you're welcome to. Cheers Dave _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Hi Dave, 2010/7/14 Dave Crossland <dave <at> lab6.com>: > Hi Parag! > > 2010/7/14 Parag N(पराग़) <panemade <at> gmail.com>: >> >> Do anyone knows any contact person for openfontlibrary project who >> can help to re-upload and make old links active for some fonts? > > I did get your email from a few days ago. Sorry for not replying sooner. > > Simple fix: add this line to /etc/hosts > > 140.211.166.148 openfontlibrary.org www.openfontlibrary.org > > and then visit openfontlibrary.org :) > > We will bring across all the old fonts and set up 403 redirections, > and if you want to help with that you're welcome to. > Thanks for your reply. How long will this migration work take? I am not sure if I can help you but if you have any particular steps to do this migration, email me and I will try to help you. :) Parag. _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org(Continue reading)
I have been investigating bug 536920, which is a crash in fontlint when running against a font file included in poker3d-data. This font file is neurpoli.ttf, which turns out to be one of the Larabie fonts. Larabie fonts cannot be packaged because of the restrictions on modification: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses_4 I imagine that Nicholas raised this problem while doing his periodic fonts-incorrectly-packaged-in-non-font-package checks. The request to separate out the fonts from poker3d-data has been long since closed WONTFIX: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 But actually, it seems that poker3d-data couldn't have this font separated out anyway. Should I be raising a bug against poker3d-data along the lines of "you need to remove non-free font from package"? _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Paul Flo Williams <paul@...> wrote: > I have been investigating bug 536920, which is a crash in fontlint when > running against a font file included in poker3d-data. > This font file is neurpoli.ttf, which turns out to be one of the Larabie > fonts. Larabie fonts cannot be packaged because of the restrictions on > modification: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses_4 > > I imagine that Nicholas raised this problem while doing his periodic > fonts-incorrectly-packaged-in-non-font-package checks. The request to > separate out the fonts from poker3d-data has been long since closed > WONTFIX: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 > > But actually, it seems that poker3d-data couldn't have this font separated > out anyway. > > Should I be raising a bug against poker3d-data along the lines of "you > need to remove non-free font from package"? My thought as a bugzapper is to re-open #477443 and set to the version you found the bug in and set information request maintainer. Going by # 477443 information only I see fast track non-responsive maintainer in this bugs future. Edward (tk009) _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list(Continue reading)
On 07/16/2010 08:48 AM, TK009 wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Paul Flo Williams <paul@...> wrote: >> I have been investigating bug 536920, which is a crash in fontlint when >> running against a font file included in poker3d-data. >> This font file is neurpoli.ttf, which turns out to be one of the Larabie >> fonts. Larabie fonts cannot be packaged because of the restrictions on >> modification: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses_4 >> >> I imagine that Nicholas raised this problem while doing his periodic >> fonts-incorrectly-packaged-in-non-font-package checks. The request to >> separate out the fonts from poker3d-data has been long since closed >> WONTFIX: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477443 >> >> But actually, it seems that poker3d-data couldn't have this font separated >> out anyway. >> >> Should I be raising a bug against poker3d-data along the lines of "you >> need to remove non-free font from package"? > > > My thought as a bugzapper is to re-open #477443 and set to the version > you found the bug in and set information request maintainer. Going by > # 477443 information only I see fast track non-responsive maintainer > in this bugs future. If you reopen that bug (or open a new bug), please block it against(Continue reading)
TK, Spot, >> My thought as a bugzapper is to re-open #477443 and set to the version >> you found the bug in and set information request maintainer. Going by >> # 477443 information only I see fast track non-responsive maintainer >> in this bugs future. I don't think I am able to reopen this bug, or I don't see how. > If you reopen that bug (or open a new bug), please block it against > FE-Legal. I have filed a new bug, 615347, blocking FE-Legal as requested. Cheers, Paul _______________________________________________ fonts mailing list fonts@... https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Le 16/07/2010 11:09, Paul Flo Williams a écrit : > I imagine that Nicolas raised this problem while doing his periodic > fonts-incorrectly-packaged-in-non-font-package checks. The request to > separate out the fonts from poker3d-data has been long since closed > WONTFIX: Actually one of the main reasons for separating fonts in sub-packages (apart from user convenience) is to force package maintainers to investigate a little the licensing of the fonts they push in Fedora, and identify legal problems (sadly, I think the majority of the fonts identified this way had to be retired, either because of legal problems, or because they were old buggy versions of fonts we already shipped in other packages). If someone want to look at the wontfixes that resulted from the initial mass-bugzilla filling, I'm sure there are still problems lurking (I don't really have the time or energy to do so right now). Another way is just to point repo-font-audit (which is in fontpackages-tools) to a public rawhide repo, and it will generate an up-to-date report. BTW Thanks a lot for your current activity fonts-side Paul, it could not come at a better moment -- -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________(Continue reading)
RSS Feed12 | |
|---|---|
1 | |
3 | |
4 | |
21 | |
9 | |
9 | |
9 | |
20 | |
16 | |
7 | |
7 | |
5 | |
26 | |
25 | |
1 | |
11 | |
9 | |
1 | |
2 | |
11 | |
1 | |
10 | |
23 | |
5 | |
8 | |
9 | |
5 | |
17 | |
8 | |
31 | |
44 | |
27 | |
5 | |
9 | |
14 | |
36 | |
5 | |
8 | |
25 | |
33 | |
39 | |
11 | |
17 | |
12 | |
2 | |
1 | |
14 | |
82 | |
61 | |
36 | |
65 | |
15 | |
32 | |
40 | |
179 | |
8 | |
65 | |
35 | |
4 | |
3 | |
16 | |
47 | |
97 | |
92 |
