Picon

Reminder meeting:i18n 2014/12/10 06:00:00 UTC

Hi All,

    You are kindly invited to the meeting:
    i18n on 2014-12-03 from 06:00:00 to 07:00:00 UTC

    Agenda is available at [1]. Feel free to add and suggest topics.

    Action items from last meeting:
* pravins to find some dedicated time for i18n cleanup.
Best Regards,
Pravin Satpute


1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2014-12-10
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Picon

Reminder meeting:i18n 2014/12/03 06:00:00 UTC

Hi All,

    Tomorrow couple of members will be not available for meeting. Still since this is final meeting before Fedora 21 release good to do the meeting and see if anything comes up or pending.

    You are kindly invited to the meeting:
    i18n on 2014-12-03 from 06:00:00 to 07:00:00 UTC

    Agenda is available at [1]. Feel free to add and suggest topics.

    Action items from last meeting:
    None


Best Regards,
Pravin Satpute


1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/I18N/Meetings/2014-12-03
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Picon

[Announce] Next improved release of Lohit Devanagari 2.95.0 with Latin and ttfautohinted.

    Last release of Lohit Devanagari we did in Feb 19, 2014. During the time number of improvements happened in Lohit Devanagari. Today releasing its next version with all the improvements. [1]

    Following are the improvements:
    1. Added Latin from https://github.com/etunni/lohit-latin
            Yes, This happened :)
            I would like to thanks Dave for this, who helped to get Latin for Devanagari done from  Eduardo Rodriguez Tunni. Now one will not feel major difference while rendering of Lohit Devanagari text with Latin since Lohit has Latin coverage itself.

    2. One of the requirement of ttfautohint is to have Latin support in fonts. (AFAIK) Due to this we were not using ttfautohint for building Lohit Devanagari. Now since we have Latin in Lohit Devanagari, we have started building ttf with ttfautohint. It means Lohit Devanagari now requires ttfautohint as a build requirement.

    2. We started compiling feature file with Adobe font development kit. (AFDKO).
            As announced earlier as well.
            Feature file of Lohit Devanagari was not compiling in OTM. [2] Root cause of problem was fontforge is bit relax while validating feature file. Had good discussion with Dave and Frank on this and finally we decided to compile feature file with AFDKO. [3]

            This also helped us to futher identified issues in feature file and we fixed those issues in feature file.

    3. Updated sfd file with resolved issues regarding marathi locale (issue id on github: #46,#47)
            These were local related issues not tested well earlier.

    4. Improved Vedic accent positioning issues. Resolves issue #https://github.com/pravins/lohit2/issues/11

    5. Added new characters uni1cf5 and uni1cf6

    Looking forward for Dave's more support to add Latin in all Lohit script fonts. Enjoy improved version of Lohit Devanagari.  Please report if any issues at github [4]. I have updated fedorahosted.org/lohit [5] page with download details

    I want to verify Lohit Devanagari with Hindi script grammer [6] and make sure it follows all rules. Soon i am going to ping some linguist who can help into this.

Cheers,
Pravin Satpute
1. https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/o/lohit/lohit-devanagari-ttf-2.95.0.tar.gz
2. https://github.com/pravins/lohit2/issues/13
3. https://github.com/adobe-type-tools/afdko
4. https://github.com/pravins/lohit/issues/new
5. https://fedorahosted.org/lohit/
6. http://www.tdil-dc.in/index.php?option=com_vertical&parentid=79&lang=en
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Rajeesh K Nambiar | 16 Nov 18:22 2014
Picon

PT Serif and PT Mono fonts packaging

Hi,

I'd like to maintain/co-maintain PT Serif[1] and PT Mono[2] fonts by
paratype. Would it be better to include them in the existing PT
Sans[3] fonts package - incorporate in the same spec as multiple
packages, or as individual specs?

Here's the altered spec file[4] and srpm[5] combining all 3 paratype
fonts. (Note the hack in %prep phase due to source packages containing
same file names). What do you think?

[1] http://www.paratype.com/uni/public/PTSerif.zip
[2] http://www.paratype.com/uni/public/PTMono.zip
[3] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/paratype-pt-sans-fonts/
[4] https://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/spec/paratype-pt-fonts.spec
[5] https://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/srpm/paratype-pt-fonts-20111230-1.fc20.src.rpm

--

-- 
Rajeesh
http://rajeeshknambiar.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Karel Volný | 6 Nov 18:12 2014
Picon

umefonts


Hi.

I've just added a new fonts request onto the wishlist:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ume_fonts

I'm planning to package it myself, unless someone else is interested, 
however as I am no font expert I'd appreciate some mentoring ...

I want to have these fonts packages to help with proper packaging of UFO:AI 
(bz#1157255).

K.

--

-- 
Karel Volný
QE BaseOs/Daemons Team
Red Hat Czech, Brno
tel. +420 532294274
(RH: +420 532294111 ext. 8262074)
xmpp kavol <at> jabber.cz
:: "Never attribute to malice what can
::  easily be explained by stupidity."
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
# | 4 Nov 10:19 2014
Picon

my font

Hello,

What i can make a .spec for my conscript font? Where I must put
documentation?
Licence file is obligatory in package? fontconf have any way for ttf font?

Is possible to add script or other way for writing specific alphabet?
Not only 'a' -> sign 'a'
but type 'a' ang read previous letter and put some signs. My font texrg
have dependencies.

Thanks
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Picon

Re: Showing fonts in GNOME Software



On 16 October 2014 13:38, Richard Hughes <hughsient-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
On 16 October 2014 08:07, pravin.d.s-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org <pravin.d.s-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> While going through metadata, i found situation is bit familiar with
> fontconfig (.conf) files in font packages. As per font packaging guideline
> fontconfig file is mandatory for each font packages.

Kinda. I think fontconfig files are a very good idea to be mandatory,
so they actually work when installed. We *don't* want all fonts to
have MetaInfo files however; some fonts are poor quality or only
contain some glyphs (e.g. the Ubuntu title font) and we don't want to
show those.

Does this means only a subset of packages will be accessible via gnome-software and for other users need to do dnf search/install?

User will not see particular font unless until he search. I think good to allow all and let user decide which is good quality and which is not. 

Regards,
Pravin Satpute
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Richard Hughes | 15 Oct 17:02 2014
Picon

Showing fonts in GNOME Software

Hi all,

I wanted to decentralize the storage of font metadata used in
gnome-software. I would be appreciative of any comments to this
article: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2014/10/15/gnome-software-and-fonts/
-- Once any big issues are ironed out, I'll send that to
devel <at> fedoraproject for comments.

Thanks,

Richard.
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Ankur Sinha | 13 Oct 14:01 2014
Picon

FF doesn't show the pound sign - what component do I file a bug against?

Hi,

I just visited a site and FF didn't show the pound sign. Would anyone
know what causes this? Is it a missing font, or a FF bug, or another
bug?

https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ff-no-pound-sign.png
--

-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Mohd Isam | 15 Aug 13:53 2014
Picon

Layla font collection

Hello all
I am sorry for re-posting, but I made the following post last month and got no reply :(

> Hi all
> My name is Mohammed Isam. I designed some fonts [few traditional Arabic fonts] that I would
> like to package for Fedora. I would appreciate your help and reviewing my package and helping
> with the packaging process. I added a wiki page for the fonts https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Layla_fonts, also I submitted a bugzilla review request #
1079090.
> Thank you in advance for your help
> Regards
I would appreciate any help with the review process, as I will be the packager of the font collection.
Please have a look at the bug and help a brother
Thanks
Mohammed Isam
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/
Michael Cronenworth | 14 Aug 21:13 2014

Re: Wine fonts

On 08/14/2014 02:02 PM, Peter Oliver wrote:
> I think part of the trouble stems from the fact that many of these
> fonts are not the fonts that they claim to be.  For example,
> gnome-font-viewer asserts that the "Arial" recently shipped by
> wine-arial-fonts is actually Liberation Sans 2.00.1.  Is this even
> legal?

The "Arial" font being shipped originates from a third-party patch set[1] that 
aims for Netflix compatibility. It[2] uses the Liberation Sans font, calls it 
Arial, and ships it.

If there are legal concerns over the use of this font I will remove it.

[1] https://github.com/compholio/wine-compholio
[2] 
https://github.com/compholio/wine-compholio/blob/master/patches/fonts-Missing_Fonts/0001-fonts-Add-Liberation-Sans-as-an-Arial-replacement.patch
_______________________________________________
fonts mailing list
fonts <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
http://fonts.fedoraproject.org/

Gmane