headers
Christopher Meng | 2 Feb 08:34
Picon
Gravatar

Doc bug in this link should be fixed

http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/
The default page of this redirect link is
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Installation_Guide/
Please update to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Installation_Guide/

ok?

Best Regards,
Christopher Meng------'Cicku'

My personal blog is http://cicku.me,hope you can visit and say
something about it.
More Contact info see here:http://about.me/cicku
--

-- 
docs mailing list
docs <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
alick | 2 Feb 13:21
Picon
Gravatar

Questions about install guide

Hi all,

I want to help publishing zh_CN version of Fedora Installation Guide. I
have some questions.

[1] says that I should join gitinstall-guide group.  I am not sure this
is required because I just see four members in this group and no one is
approved.

In the page [1], the last but one link 'statistics page' points to the
outdated translate.fp.o url [2]. Can anyone update it?

The po files on transifex are not complete. There are only some
resources beginning with the character A. [3] Is that intended, or kind
of a bug?

[1]: https://fedorahosted.org/install-guide/
[2]: http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/docs-install-guide
[3]: https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/fedora-install-guide/

-- 
alick
Fedora 16 (Verne) user
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alick
--

-- 
docs mailing list
docs <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Ben Cotton | 2 Feb 15:33
Favicon

Re: Questions about install guide

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:21 AM, alick <alick9188 <at> gmail.com> wrote:

> [1] says that I should join gitinstall-guide group.  I am not sure this
> is required because I just see four members in this group and no one is
> approved.
>
That information is outdated. We consolidated the groups for ease of
use. I've corrected the Trac reference to point to the 'docs-writers'
group.

> In the page [1], the last but one link 'statistics page' points to the
> outdated translate.fp.o url [2]. Can anyone update it?
>
Done!

-- 
Ben Cotton
Fedora Docs Leader
--

-- 
docs mailing list
docs <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Eric H. Christensen | 2 Feb 16:44
Favicon

Re: Doc bug in this link should be fixed


On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:34:45PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/
> The default page of this redirect link is
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Installation_Guide/
> Please update to
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/16/html/Installation_Guide/
> 
> ok?

Yes, this change should happen.

-- Eric

--------------------------------------------------
Eric H Christensen        eric <at> christensenplace.us
"Sparks"                  sparks <at> fedoraproject.org
   .... .. .-.. .-.. ---   .-- --- .-. .-.. -..
097C 82C3 52DF C64A 50C2  E3A3 8076 ABDE 024B B3D1
--------------------------------------------------
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Petr Kovar | 2 Feb 21:12
Picon
Favicon

Updated lang codes

Hi list,

There are some new languages registered on fedora.transifex.net, so we need
to update the .tx/config file in our guides again. The updated list of lang
codes is available at:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Setting_up_a_document_with_Transifex#Step_5:_Map_Language_Codes

Guide owners, please update your tx/config file before running tx pull.

Cheers,
Petr Kovar
--

-- 
docs mailing list
docs <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Jaromir Hradilek | 3 Feb 01:00
Picon
Favicon

Resource Management Guide repository changes

Dear writers,

To make the location of repositories for our books consistent, the Git 
repository for the Fedora Resource Management Guide has been moved from 
its previous location and can now be found here:

   http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=docs/resource-management-guide.git

If you already have a clone of the repository on your disk, you will not 
be able to pull or push any changes unless you update the URL. To do so, 
get into the working directory, open the .git/config file in a text 
editor of your choice, and find the following line:

   url = 
ssh://<fas_login>@git.fedorahosted.org/git/resource-management-guide.git

...where <fas_login> is your FAS username. Now update the URL to look 
like this:

   url = 
ssh://<fas_login>@git.fedorahosted.org/git/docs/resource-management-guide.git

Many thanks to nb for moving this repo where it should have been in the 
first place.

Cheers,
--

-- 
Jaromir Hradilek
Associate Content Author
Engineering Content Services
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
alick | 3 Feb 03:33
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Questions about install guide

于 2012年02月02日 22:33, Ben Cotton 写道:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 7:21 AM, alick <alick9188 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> [1] says that I should join gitinstall-guide group.  I am not sure this
>> is required because I just see four members in this group and no one is
>> approved.
>>
> That information is outdated. We consolidated the groups for ease of
> use. I've corrected the Trac reference to point to the 'docs-writers'
> group.
> 
There is still another link 'join our project group' to be updated from
gitinstall-guide ;)

-- 
alick
Fedora 16 (Verne) user
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Alick
--

-- 
docs mailing list
docs <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Ben Cotton | 3 Feb 04:02
Favicon

Re: Questions about install guide

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:33 PM, alick <alick9188 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> There is still another link 'join our project group' to be updated from
> gitinstall-guide ;)

So there is. Thank you for catching that. I've struck the sentence entirely.

-- 
Ben Cotton
Fedora Docs Leader
--

-- 
docs mailing list
docs <at> lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/docs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Ian Weller | 3 Feb 17:00
Gravatar

Resurrecting mw-render

At FUDCon Blacksburg, Sparks, jjmcd, and I determined that mw-render no
longer provides a DocBook writer and therefore it would be stupid to try
and repackage it.

This week I found out that was still true, but instead of completely
deleting code, they decided to move the DocBook renderer (and its
required XHTML renderer) in a separate Python package.

Here is the status of getting everything we need back into Fedora:
  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ianweller/mwlib_status
However, before I go too crazy, I wanted to present the current SRPMs
that I have now so that you guys can test and make sure python-mwlib is
still something we can use in Docs.

At this point I will freeze these SRPM releases, so if I make a new one
there will also be a corresponding release bump and a changelog entry.

http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-mwlib/0.13.3-1/
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-mwlib-docbook/0.1.0-1/
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-mwlib-xhtml/0.1.0-1/
http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-qserve/0.2.6-1/

Additional packages you will need:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-bottle-0.10.7-1.fc16
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=786668

Everything else should already be in Fedora.

(TODO: It was brought to my attention that apipkg is bundled in
python-py and there is an actual upstream project which is supposed to
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Ian Weller | 3 Feb 18:15
Gravatar

Re: mwlib work

On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 05:59:00PM +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 03/02/2012 alle 09.47 -0600, Ian Weller ha scritto: 
> > On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 02:44:55PM +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> > > - python-apipkg, review request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/652034
> > 
> > Just looked a little bit more and it looks like python-py is bundling
> > this from upstream, and that's not okay either :) So I'll add that
> > review request to the list and also note that I need to submit a bug
> > against python-py to unbundle apipkg.
> 
> It looks like that both apipkg and py are maintained by the same guy
> (Holger Krekel):
> 
> http://bitbucket.org/hpk42/apipkg
> https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/py
> 
> apipkg is probably just a subset of py.

I'm going to ask upstream if apipkg is updated properly in py, and then
ask the python-py maintainer to add a Provides: python-apipkg. And then
close the python-apipkg review request assuming that all goes through
just fine.

Or maybe I'll ask FPC.

(This is stupid.)

--

-- 
Ian Weller <ian <at> ianweller.org>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane