Helge Hess | 1 Jul 2006 01:43
Favicon

Re: groupware for Fedora

On Jun 30, 2006, at 16:58, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> Somebody really just needs to figure out how to build OGo from a
> pristine system.

Building OGo from source is a simple

   ./configure; make install

And then some configuration (DB setup etc).

Though OGo isn't ported yet to x86_64, thats a valid point ;-)

Greets,
   Helge
-- 
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

A S Alam | 1 Jul 2006 07:25
Picon
Favicon

Re: new s-c-soundcard in rawhide

Martin Stransky ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
> Hello guys,
>
> there is a new version of s-c-s in rawhide (2.0.0). It has some new 
> features like new GUI, proc&HAL detection, driver reloading and card 
> ordering.
>
> I'll be happy for any feedback and/or BZ entries.
>
> Martin
>
1) stop button does not stop Sound, music is going one, even message box 
appear to showing that "Did you hear sample sound?"
2) if you click on some other window, Message box hide behind main 
window, it like to be always on top of main window

thanks

-- 
A S Alam

join us at #fedora-l10n (freenode)

"Either find a way or make one"

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

(Continue reading)

Arthur Pemberton | 1 Jul 2006 11:39
Picon

Re: Changing the default font in Fedora Core 6

The existence of this font should at the very least be a FAQ "nearby".

I installed the font packages, and the experience is pleasantly different.

Thank you for this information.

-- 
To be updated...

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Dan Williams | 1 Jul 2006 13:54
Picon
Favicon

Re: new s-c-soundcard in rawhide

On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 21:37 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 16:43 +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> > features like new GUI, proc&HAL detection, driver reloading and card 
> 
> Are there ever audio cards that a new HAL does not detect?

That's the point :)  Old s-c-soundcard had problems detecting some stuff
(like usb audio devices) and didn't really do hotplug very well.  HAL
lets us do this quite easily.

Dan

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Thorsten Leemhuis | 1 Jul 2006 18:16

Re: Update guidelines?

Mike A. Harris schrieb:
> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> ). Updated X-drivers would also be a good start, but it seems that's
>> still a hard job even in times of modular X.
> There are basically 2 ways to do driver updates:
> 1) By updating a driver to a newer upstream version.
> [...]
> Since X.Org 7.0 was released however, there have not been very
> many driver updates released for the 7.0 X server.  I believe
> we released an 'ati' update, but don't specifically remember if
> any others were done off the top of my head.

Well, I looked into this once and found the file
http://xorg.freedesktop.org/archive/individual/driver/xf86-video-i810-1.5.0.0.tar.bz2
from 26-Jan-2006 09:42  383K (e.g. round about one month after Xorg 7.0
was released and four before 7.1 was published).

It has support for 945GM, it compiles without problems on FC5 but I
unfortunately don't have hardware at hand to test if it really works.

I couldn't find anything in the docs if this driver is for 7.0 or 7.1
:-/ Can somebody give me a hint where to look for such a information?

CU
thl

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
(Continue reading)

Aurelien Bompard | 2 Jul 2006 11:49
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: groupware for Fedora

Helge Hess wrote:
> Building OGo from source is a simple
>    ./configure; make install

$ ./configure
error: please specify a GNUstep make tree!

Well, not really that simple. The dependencies are pretty heavy, according
to http://www.opengroupware.org/en/devs/build/index.html

Apparently :
 - GNUstep Make
 - GNUstep Objective-C Runtime
 - Libfoundation (implementation of the OpenStep Foundation API)
 - SOPE (application server)
and then, you can build opengroupware.org

I tried the spec files, but they are made to be generic (and thus complex)
spec files, building on different distributions, and need external macro
definitions (apparently in
http://svn.opengroupware.org/OpenGroupware.org/trunk/maintenance/rpm_buildenvironment/macros/)

At the moment, opengroupware *is* quite complicated to build.

Aurélien
-- 
http://aurelien.bompard.org  ~~~~  Jabber : abompard <at> jabber.fr
For external use only

--

-- 
(Continue reading)

Erwin Rol | 2 Jul 2006 12:06

Re: groupware for Fedora

On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 11:49 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> Helge Hess wrote:
> > Building OGo from source is a simple
> >    ./configure; make install
> 
> $ ./configure
> error: please specify a GNUstep make tree!
> 
> Well, not really that simple. The dependencies are pretty heavy, according
> to http://www.opengroupware.org/en/devs/build/index.html
> 
> Apparently :
>  - GNUstep Make
>  - GNUstep Objective-C Runtime
>  - Libfoundation (implementation of the OpenStep Foundation API)
>  - SOPE (application server)
> and then, you can build opengroupware.org
> 
> I tried the spec files, but they are made to be generic (and thus complex)
> spec files, building on different distributions, and need external macro
> definitions (apparently in
> http://svn.opengroupware.org/OpenGroupware.org/trunk/maintenance/rpm_buildenvironment/macros/)
> 
> At the moment, opengroupware *is* quite complicated to build.

ATrpms has RPMS for FC6, but ATrpms also uses a bit incompatible build
system, but that should be more easy to adapt to FC/FE build system.
Just take a look at http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/ 

- Erwin
(Continue reading)

Axel Thimm | 2 Jul 2006 13:52

Re: groupware for Fedora

On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:43:56AM +0200, Helge Hess wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2006, at 16:58, Steven Pritchard wrote:
> >Somebody really just needs to figure out how to build OGo from a
> >pristine system.
> 
> Building OGo from source is a simple
> 
>   ./configure; make install
> 
> And then some configuration (DB setup etc).
> 
> Though OGo isn't ported yet to x86_64, thats a valid point ;-)

Currenlty it builds only on x86_64 (?)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
David | 2 Jul 2006 13:54

YUM UPDATE _ FEDORA CORE 5

Hi All,

I attempted a YUM UPDATE on the laptop this morning and it stopped with
the following messages;

librpcsecgss.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils
libgssapi.so.1 is needed by package nfs-utils

I tried an update on my 2nd PC which also failed so the fault
replicates.

Anyone any thoughts?

Cheers

David

--

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list <at> redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Axel Thimm | 2 Jul 2006 13:59

Re: groupware for Fedora

On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:06:57PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 11:49 +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> > Helge Hess wrote:
> > > Building OGo from source is a simple
> > >    ./configure; make install
> > 
> > $ ./configure
> > error: please specify a GNUstep make tree!
> > 
> > Well, not really that simple. The dependencies are pretty heavy, according
> > to http://www.opengroupware.org/en/devs/build/index.html
> > 
> > Apparently :
> >  - GNUstep Make
> >  - GNUstep Objective-C Runtime
> >  - Libfoundation (implementation of the OpenStep Foundation API)
> >  - SOPE (application server)
> > and then, you can build opengroupware.org
> > 
> > I tried the spec files, but they are made to be generic (and thus complex)
> > spec files, building on different distributions, and need external macro
> > definitions (apparently in
> > http://svn.opengroupware.org/OpenGroupware.org/trunk/maintenance/rpm_buildenvironment/macros/)
> > 
> > At the moment, opengroupware *is* quite complicated to build.
> 
> ATrpms has RPMS for FC6, but ATrpms also uses a bit incompatible build
> system, but that should be more easy to adapt to FC/FE build system.
> Just take a look at http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/ 

(Continue reading)


Gmane