headers
Mei Piggott | 2 Aug 2012 20:34
Picon
Favicon

hey:) My name is Mei!:)

You've got no idea what a lucky man u r 'cuz I'm writing 2 u now!
My name is Mei and I am such a hot girl, u know)
Istumbled on those sweet looking profile pics of u and I thought that it's alright if I'll to write you first!
It would be great if I could know u better. Probably we would be able to make something out, who knows, right?)
I didn't describe myself yet. So, I am 22 years old and I work for one big retailer firm as a office manager. I'm
5'8, ginger with impressive tits) 
It's interesting to hear what u got to say)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Mr. David Williams | 6 Aug 2012 16:28
Picon

Good Day.


Good Day.

I am Mr. David Williams from London-UK. I wish to transfer sum of  
(38,000,000.00) pounds sterling, which belong to the director and  
owner of petrochemical service. He died with out a WILL through my  
investigation. However, if you can be honest with me i will work this  
deal out with you without any further delay,please send me your  
telephone number or reply through my private email {  
investmentcontact <at> googlemail.com } I will give you more information  
regarding this transaction if you are interested and I receive your  
answer.

Thanks once again.

Yours truly,
Mr. David Williams

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Callie Rabe | 8 Aug 2012 12:45
Picon
Favicon

Here is the thing, I like u

How r you doing! I am Callie.
First of all, I have to that you def look amazing on photos, I would regret forever if I didn't write and send
this letter to u. 
So, u attracted me and it will be interesting to know you a little bit better. So, you already know my name,
what else, I'm red haired, my eyes are big and they r green, I stay in shape. I really think that you r very
attractive man and to ensure that I'm not kidding, Igoing to attach some sexy shots to my next letter,
sounds better this time?)
Hope to see you letter in my inbox soon)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Violette Lanoue | 10 Aug 2012 23:14
Picon
Favicon

U may think that this is crazy. You don't know me but I'm pretty sure u would like to meet me

Howdy, 
My name is Violette - sweet woman with a lot crazy thoughts in head! 
What I am searching for here? U know, I'm not sure! Probably just interesting conversations with fellows,
maybe some flirt, maybe some bedroom relations or maybe something like serious relations if we are lucky.
Who knows, maybe u are the pal I need?!  
then, bye-bye, write me back, honey. I gonna wait for it! Kissing you
Violette
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Charles Williams | 11 Aug 2012 13:11

PPTP/PPP/Radius/LDAP and usernames in email format

Hey all,

Heres's one for you. I am currently setting up a new MS-ChapV2/MPPE VPN 
gateway with pptp/ppp to freeradius authing against an LDAP store.

This VPN will be used for multiple client domains and so I would like to 
use usernames in the form of „user <at> domain.tld <mailto:user <at> domain.tld>“ 
instead of „user“ (which is the situation atm).

The LDAP store has a branch as follows:

ou=domains,dc=company,dc=com

under ou=domains I have entries for each domain that I will be offering 
VPN access to.

ie. cn=domain.tld,ou=domains,dc=company,dc=com

I would like to get ppp to send the complete user <at> domain.tld 
<mailto:user <at> domain.tld> to radius and have radius use the „domain.tld“ 
as part of the filter for the username search to limit the search to the 
sub-branch from the correct domain.

The problem is that I have yet to find a way to get ppp to send the 
username to Freeradius if there is an  <at>  symbol in the username.

Any ideas?

thanks,
chuck
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Charles Williams | 11 Aug 2012 13:13

PPTP/PPP/Radius/LDAP and usernames in email format

Sorry all, it would seem that a bit of HTML got caught up in the 
pasting. Here is the one that was meant to be sent.

Hey all,

Heres's one for you. I am currently setting up a new MS-ChapV2/MPPE VPN 
gateway with pptp/ppp to freeradius authing against an LDAP store.

This VPN will be used for multiple client domains and so I would like to 
use usernames in the form of „user <at> domain.tld“ instead of „user“ (which 
is the situation atm).

The LDAP store has a branch as follows:

ou=domains,dc=company,dc=com

under ou=domains I have entries for each domain that I will be offering 
VPN access to.

ie. cn=domain.tld,ou=domains,dc=company,dc=com

I would like to get ppp to send the complete user <at> domain.tld to radius 
and have radius use the „domain.tld“ as part of the filter for the 
username search to limit the search to the sub-branch from the correct 
domain.

The problem is that I have yet to find a way to get ppp to send the 
username to Freeradius if there is an  <at>  symbol in the username.

Any ideas?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
neha chatrath | 14 Aug 2012 13:44
Favicon

Using pppd as a library

Hello,

I have system requirement in which I need to invoke pppd from a user 
application. This user application needs to do configuration, get status 
etc of the PPP links.
Well there are various ways of doing it, I am exploring the option of 
including pppd as a library in my build. With this,
-I can spawn my application as a thread.
-I can avoid  use of fork and exec operations for executing pppd for 
different links.

Can somebody help me with this. Is there any pppd library already available?

Thanks and regards
Neha Chatrath
Disclaimer : 
This email communication may contain privileged and confidential information and is intended for the
use of the addressee only.If you are not an intended recipient you are requested not to reproduce,copy
disseminate or in any manner distribute this email communication as the same is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this email in error, Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
the communication sent in error.Email communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure & error free
and INDIABULLS is not liable for any errors in the email communication or for the proper, timely and
complete transmission thereof.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
the body of a message to majordomo <at> vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 6 comments |
headers
Charlie Brady | 14 Aug 2012 16:01
Picon
Picon

Re: Using pppd as a library


On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, neha chatrath wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have system requirement in which I need to invoke pppd from a user
> application. This user application needs to do configuration, get status etc
> of the PPP links.
> Well there are various ways of doing it, I am exploring the option of
> including pppd as a library in my build. With this,
> -I can spawn my application as a thread.
> -I can avoid  use of fork and exec operations for executing pppd for different
> links.

Why do you want to avoid such useful constructs? I suggest you google for 
"make a rod for your own back".

> Can somebody help me with this. Is there any pppd library already available?
> 
> Thanks and regards
> Neha Chatrath

Really, the following is true?

> Disclaimer : This email communication may contain privileged and 
> confidential information and is intended for the use of the addressee 
> only.

Total bullcrap...
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Bill Unruh | 14 Aug 2012 16:29
Picon
Picon

Re: Using pppd as a library

On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Charlie Brady wrote:

It is legal crap some companies require, not realising that using it like this
makes it worthless as a legal bulwark. Anyone they try to prosecute need only
point out that this disclaimer is used on material for which the disclaimer is
clearly nonsense, and thus that the company does not take it seriously itself,
so why should the court.

>
> Really, the following is true?
>
>> Disclaimer : This email communication may contain privileged and
>> confidential information and is intended for the use of the addressee
>> only.
>
> Total bullcrap...
>
>> If you are not an intended recipient you are
>> requested not to reproduce,copy
>> disseminate or in any manner distribute this email communication as the same
>> is strictly prohibited. If
>> you have received this email in error, Please notify the sender immediately by
>> return e-mail and delete
>> the communication sent in error.Email communications cannot be guaranteed to
>> be secure & error free
>> and INDIABULLS is not liable for any errors in the email communication or for
>> the proper, timely and
>> complete transmission thereof.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ppp" in
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
James Carlson | 14 Aug 2012 16:57

Re: Using pppd as a library

On 08/14/12 07:44, neha chatrath wrote:
> I have system requirement in which I need to invoke pppd from a user
> application. This user application needs to do configuration, get status
> etc of the PPP links.
> Well there are various ways of doing it, I am exploring the option of
> including pppd as a library in my build. With this,
> -I can spawn my application as a thread.
> -I can avoid  use of fork and exec operations for executing pppd for
> different links.

You'll need to somehow deal with the event loop that handles both timers
and control path I/O.  And you may also have to deal with blocking
operations, such as name service look-ups that occur during
configuration parsing, that the rest of your application may not be
expecting in a library.

It sounds like a non-trivial thing to get right, at least to me.  (Of
course, it's probably possible to do it wrong with less effort.  ;-})

Note also that the current code assumes that it's running in a single
process per PPP link.  It's littered with statics and other things that
would need to be cleaned up if you were to make it useful for multiple
links in a single process.

I wouldn't do it this way.  Instead, I would use some IPC mechanism to
get at the data necessary.  Then it's just a matter of figuring out how
to get the IPC into the existing event loop (or go multi-threaded if you
dare).  Suitable IPCs (UDP sockets, named pipes, Solaris Doors) will
vary depending on OS, and suitable protocols to use over the IPC will
also vary depending on the application.  In some cases, it may make
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |

Gmane