RE: panic with GigE(intel 82546EB + e1000 driver)in2.4.18_mvl30-ixdp2400

I'm using 82546 regularly with IXP2400 2.4.18_mvl30-ixdp2401 also not
saw such problem. Some questions/suggestions:
- Did you try to check PERR/SERR status on PCI devices (host and card)
status after crash - maybe it is just hardware?
- What CPU version is in both platforms?
- Do you have updated proc-xscale.S? (#if
defined(CONFIG_ARCH_IXDP2400)... in cpu_xscale_set_pmd and
cpu_xscale_set_pte)  If not; look  <at> MVZ or in 2.4.21-rmk1-ds3.
- What exactly is in your kernel at 8003e4b8?
	Andrzej

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces <at> lists.arm.linux.org.uk
[mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces <at> lists.arm.linux.org.uk] On Behalf Of
Jiang, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 8:33 PM
To: dsaxena <at> plexity.net; romit dasgupta
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <at> lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: RE: panic with GigE(intel 82546EB + e1000
driver)in2.4.18_mvl30-ixdp2400

>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-arm-kernel-bounces <at> lists.arm.linux.org.uk 
>[mailto:linux-arm-kernel-bounces <at> lists.arm.linux.org.uk] On 
>Behalf Of Deepak Saxena
>Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:18 AM
>To: romit dasgupta
>Cc: linux-arm-kernel <at> lists.arm.linux.org.uk
>Subject: Re: panic with GigE(intel 82546EB + e1000 driver) 
>in2.4.18_mvl30-ixdp2400

hang in flush_tlb_all()

Hi to all!

I am using a kernel version 2.6.0 with ARM patch rmk2 to port s3c2410

My problem is that both the "flush_tlb_all()" function calls at
arch/arm/mm/mm-armv.c and arch/arm/mm/init.c hangs.

Please advice me on what to do.

Thanks,

--Best Regards! --
  Lesslin.Xiu

_________________________________________________________________
Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php

Cross compiling e2fsprog-1.32 library

Hi There ,
          I had downloaded e2fsprogs-1.32 version of code from
sourceforge.net .
It has a configure script and i tried several options to make it generate
arm version of the libraries but still it generates x86 libraries.
I have 2.95.3 arm cross compiler . If someone knows configure script options
for arm cross compilation  on x86 , please let me know . I would appreciate
it
a lot .
Thanks in advance.
Sai

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php

help: Error: selected processor does not support `pld [r3,#0]'

to all:

I met a problem while compiling kernel 2.6.0-test2-rmk1-pxa1:
  CC      arch/arm/kernel/traps.o
/tmp/ccxxxye2.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccxxxye2.s:1199: Error: selected processor does not support `pld [r3,#0]'
/tmp/ccxxxye2.s:1238: Error: selected processor does not support `pld [r3,#0]'
make[1]: *** [arch/arm/kernel/traps.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm/kernel] Error 2

my cross compiler is:arm-linux-gcc-3.3.2.tar.bz2 downloaded from http://handhelds.org/download/linux/arm/toolchain.


to bliu:
I found that you met this problem in 2.5.x kernel too, have you resolved this problem?

any help appreciated!


William Hanwoody

_________________________________________________________________

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php

How to maintain a parallel (ARM) kernel tree?

Excuse me for this slightly OT message...

I want to port the ARM kernel to a new (quite complicated) hardware,
which requires not only more drivers, but also changes into scheduler,
irq, mm and other systems. I think I should maintain a separate kernel tree
for this. I haven't found any information on how to achieve this, the
only simple solution I have is to put the whole kernel tree on a CVS server.
Is it a common way or is there a less heavier solution? Also note the
hardware is for private use, nothing obtainable by the public.

Milan

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php

Re: How to maintain a parallel (ARM) kernel tree?

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:17:58AM +0200, Milan Krcmar wrote:
> Excuse me for this slightly OT message...
> 
> I want to port the ARM kernel to a new (quite complicated) hardware,
> which requires not only more drivers, but also changes into scheduler,
> irq, mm and other systems. I think I should maintain a separate kernel tree
> for this. I haven't found any information on how to achieve this, the
> only simple solution I have is to put the whole kernel tree on a CVS server.
> Is it a common way or is there a less heavier solution? Also note the
> hardware is for private use, nothing obtainable by the public.

Yes, this is very off topic as this has nothing to do with ARM.

Look into BitKeeper.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php

about console and printk

Hi all,

When can I see the messages produced by printk()?
Immediately after console_init() if everything set up well?

Thanks a lot.

Du

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php

Re: Cross compiling e2fsprog-1.32 library

Hi Sai,

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 21:02:45 -0800
"Sai Pothana" <spothana <at> neomagic.com> bubbled:

> Hi There ,
>           I had downloaded e2fsprogs-1.32 version of code from
> sourceforge.net .
> It has a configure script and i tried several options to make it generate
> arm version of the libraries but still it generates x86 libraries.
> I have 2.95.3 arm cross compiler . If someone knows configure script options
> for arm cross compilation  on x86 , please let me know . I would appreciate
> it
> a lot .

export the CC, LD, AS, AR, and so on for your cross compiler.

like my script does:

# cat ./arm_cc_env.sh 
PATH=/usr/armeb-elf-linux-gnu-uClibc/bin:
/usr/armeb-elf-linux-gnu/bin:/bin:/sbin:
/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin:
/opt/bin:/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.2:
/opt/Acrobat5:/usr/X11R6/bin:/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/bin:
/opt/blackdown-jdk-1.4.1/jre/bin:/usr/qt/3/bin:/usr/qt/2/bin:
/opt/vmware/bin

export CC=armeb-elf-linux-gnu-gcc
CC=armeb-elf-linux-gnu-gcc

Re: How to maintain a parallel (ARM) kernel tree?

On Mar 31 2004, at 22:33, Marc Singer was caught saying:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:17:58AM +0200, Milan Krcmar wrote:
> > Excuse me for this slightly OT message...
> > 
> > I want to port the ARM kernel to a new (quite complicated) hardware,
> > which requires not only more drivers, but also changes into scheduler,
> > irq, mm and other systems. I think I should maintain a separate kernel tree
> > for this. I haven't found any information on how to achieve this, the
> > only simple solution I have is to put the whole kernel tree on a CVS server.
> > Is it a common way or is there a less heavier solution? Also note the
> > hardware is for private use, nothing obtainable by the public.
> 
> Yes, this is very off topic as this has nothing to do with ARM.
> 
> Look into BitKeeper.

Except that you cannot use bitkeeper on a project unless that project's
code is open source _and_ made available for public access either via
BK or patches. At least that's my understanding of the license.

~Deepak

--

-- 
Deepak Saxena - dsaxena at plexity dot net - http://www.plexity.net/

"Unlike me, many of you have accepted the situation of your imprisonment and 
 will die here like rotten cabbages." - Number 6

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: How to maintain a parallel (ARM) kernel tree?

On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:00:24AM -0700, Deepak Saxena wrote:
> On Mar 31 2004, at 22:33, Marc Singer was caught saying:
> > On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 08:17:58AM +0200, Milan Krcmar wrote:
> > > Excuse me for this slightly OT message...
> > > 
> > > I want to port the ARM kernel to a new (quite complicated) hardware,
> > > which requires not only more drivers, but also changes into scheduler,
> > > irq, mm and other systems. I think I should maintain a separate kernel tree
> > > for this. I haven't found any information on how to achieve this, the
> > > only simple solution I have is to put the whole kernel tree on a CVS server.
> > > Is it a common way or is there a less heavier solution? Also note the
> > > hardware is for private use, nothing obtainable by the public.
> > 
> > Yes, this is very off topic as this has nothing to do with ARM.
> > 
> > Look into BitKeeper.
> 
> Except that you cannot use bitkeeper on a project unless that project's
> code is open source _and_ made available for public access either via
> BK or patches. At least that's my understanding of the license.
> 

Or you can pay for BitKeeper.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscription options: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
FAQ/Etiquette:       http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/armlinux/mailinglists.php