headers
btsadmin | 1 Mar 2008 01:26

[poldek: Bug 117] New: Assertion 'n_array_size(candidates) > 1' failed, requirements.c:433

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117

           Summary: Assertion 'n_array_size(candidates) > 1' failed,
                    requirements.c:433
           Product: poldek
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: x86_64
        OS/Version: PLD Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: Core
        AssignedTo: mis <at> pld-linux.org
        ReportedBy: pluto <at> agmk.net
   Estimated Hours: 0.0

poldek:/all-avail> install xalan-c-devel-1.10.0-3.x86_64
Przetwarzanie zależności...
Something wrong, something not quite right with 0.30 (snap20080225.00)
Assertion 'n_array_size(candidates) > 1' failed, requirements.c:433

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 2 Mar 2008 20:20

[poldek: Bug 117] Assertion 'n_array_size(candidates) > 1' failed, requirements.c:433

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117

--- Comment #1 from Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-02 20:20:28 ---
Works for me; show me the output of "poldek -l" and debug log prepared by:

$ POLDEK_TRACE=1 poldek -uv xalan-c-devel-1.10.0-3.x86_64

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 2 Mar 2008 22:36

[poldek: Bug 117] Assertion 'n_array_size(candidates) > 1' failed, requirements.c:433

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117

Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm <at> pld-linux.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |arekm <at> pld-linux.org

--- Comment #2 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-02 22:36:12 ---
I have the same problem.

[root <at> builderth ~]# poldek -l
home         /root/rpm/RPMS  (noauto,noautoup,type=dir)
local        /spools/ready/  (type=pndir)
th           ftp://ep09.pld-linux.org/dists/th/PLD/noarch/RPMS/  (type=pndir)
th           ftp://ep09.pld-linux.org/dists/th/PLD/x86_64/RPMS/  (type=pndir)
th-i686      ftp://ep09.pld-linux.org/dists/th/PLD/i686/RPMS/ 
(noauto,type=pndir)
th-test      ftp://ep09.pld-linux.org/dists/th/test/noarch/RPMS/  (type=pndir)
th-test      ftp://ep09.pld-linux.org/dists/th/test/x86_64/RPMS/  (type=pndir)
th-test-i686 ftp://ep09.pld-linux.org/dists/th/test/i686/RPMS/ 
(noauto,type=pndir)

[root <at> builderth ~]# POLDEK_TRACE=1 poldek -n th-test -n th-test-i686 -uv glibc
Loading [pndir]th-test...
Loading [pndir]th-test...
Loading [pndir]th-test-i686...
7054 packages read
warn: glibc: ambiguous name
Freeing locks for locker 0x1baba: 27067/46922029905280
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 2 Mar 2008 23:39

[poldek: Bug 118] New: one missing dep has influence on all other "sets"

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118

           Summary: one missing dep has influence on all other "sets"
           Product: poldek
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: PLD Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: Normal
         Component: Core
        AssignedTo: mis <at> pld-linux.org
        ReportedBy: arekm <at> pld-linux.org
   Estimated Hours: 0.0

User-Agent:       Opera/9.50 (X11; Linux i686; U; en)
Build Identifier: poldek-0:0.30-0.20080225.00.0.1.i686

coreutils failed deps somehow has influence on openssh where openssh has all
needed dependencies.

poldek:/all-avail> greedy-upgrade core* openssh*
Przetwarzanie zależności...
coreutils-6.9-2.i686 zostanie zastÄ…piony przez coreutils-6.10-1.i686
mktemp-1.5-20.i686 zostanie zastÄ…piony przez coreutils-6.10-1.i686
błąd: mktemp >= 1.5-8 is required by man-1.6e-1.i686, give up
Installing set #2
Przetwarzanie zależności...
openssh-4.7p1-3.i686 zostanie zastÄ…piony przez openssh-4.7p1-4.i686
openssh-clients-4.7p1-3.i686 zostanie zastÄ…piony przez
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 2 Mar 2008 23:43

[poldek: Bug 118] one missing dep has influence on all other "sets"

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118

--- Comment #1 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <arekm <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-02 23:43:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=14)
 --> (http://bugs.pld-linux.org/attachment.cgi?id=14)
trace

trace

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 3 Mar 2008 00:22

[poldek: Bug 118] one missing dep has influence on all other "sets"

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118

Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-03 00:22:29 ---
fixed; patch temporary added to temporary poldek-bug117hack.patch

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 3 Mar 2008 00:25

[poldek: Bug 117] Assertion 'n_array_size(candidates) > 1' failed, requirements.c:433

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117

Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-03 00:25:54 ---
a workaround poldek-bug117hack patch has been added to PLD's spec.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 3 Mar 2008 00:31

[poldek: Bug 112] assert failed when loading big(733 pkgs?) type=dir ?

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112

Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-03 00:31:51 ---
I've been tried with few dir repos and can't reproduce; could you give me an
access to this set of packages? 

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 3 Mar 2008 00:53

[poldek: Bug 112] assert failed when loading big(733 pkgs?) type=dir ?

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112

--- Comment #4 from Elan Ruusamäe <glen <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-03 00:53:40 ---
i'm sorry, i don't have that repo anymore, tmpwatch cleans up /spools/ready.
however i'm going to send db4.5 again, and see if the problem comes back.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
btsadmin | 3 Mar 2008 01:10

[poldek: Bug 99] --verify doesn't take account obsoletes

http://bugs.pld-linux.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99

Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |INVALID
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #1 from Paweł Gajda <mis <at> pld-linux.org>  2008-03-03 01:10:25 ---
I'm not planning to process Obsoletes during --verify. It will emulates real 
package upgrades, what is already supported by "to repository" installation.

Using 0.3 snap you may try to do such verification after "dry" Ac upgrade: 

 $ mkdir /tmp/ac && poldek -n ac --mkidx=/tmp/ac/
 $ poldek -n ac-updates --Q --destination /tmp/ac/
-Oauto_directory_dependencies=n --justdb --noask --upgrade-dist -v

And then:
 $ poldek -s /tmp/ac --verify=deps 

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.pld-linux.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
pld-bugs mailing list
pld-bugs <at> lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-bugs
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |

Gmane