Hi there!
It seems as though the --keep_dst option is backwards, and looking at the
code:
undo_private () {
if [ $keep_dst -eq 1 ]; then
$SSH "root <at> $host" "rm -rf $VE_PRIVATE"
fi
undo_conf
}
That does not seem quite right to me; it should be -eq 0.
Am I reading this incorrectly?
--Jim
Hi All, I am new to the list and just getting into using OpenVZ. I have the following questions: 1) Does OpenVZ supports any type of load sharing and load balancing across VMs on the same physical machine and/or across different host via the Host OS. 2) How about Stanby Redundacy from two or more different HOST. Just curious if any of the above type of technology solutions exist using OpenVZ. I know this type of technology exist in the router/firewall world - Would be nice if that kind of stuff is supported for OpenVZ. Thanks in advance for your comments! Joe
You can easily install a squid load balancer to load balance http and httpd traffic with 2/3 environments. I'm not aware of any built-in support. Jonathan Lambert On May 3, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Joe Lee wrote: > Hi All, I am new to the list and just getting into using OpenVZ. I > have the following questions: > > 1) Does OpenVZ supports any type of load sharing and load balancing > across VMs on the same physical machine > and/or across different host via the Host OS. > > 2) How about Stanby Redundacy from two or more different HOST. > > Just curious if any of the above type of technology solutions exist > using OpenVZ. I know this type of technology exist in the router/ > firewall world - Would be nice if that kind of stuff is supported > for OpenVZ. > > Thanks in advance for your comments! > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@... > https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users(Continue reading)
Hello Jim, You are right, --keep_dst option works incorrect now. Thanks for your correction! We will include it in next release. Regards, Andrey > Subject: ???????[Users] Bug in vzmigrate? > Date: ??Wed, 3 May 2006 13:29:20 -0400 (EDT) > From: ??Jim Zajkowski <jamesez@...> > Reply-To: ??????users@... > To: ????users@... > > > > Hi there! > > It seems as though the --keep_dst option is backwards, and looking at the > code: > > undo_private () { > ? ? ? ? if [ $keep_dst -eq 1 ]; then > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $SSH "root <at> $host" "rm -rf $VE_PRIVATE" > ? ? ? ? fi > ? ? ? ? undo_conf > }(Continue reading)
Hi, I didn't download the Fedora Core 5 snapshot, preferring to build the OS template cache from scratch. The only problem is that I get the following error: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/named.conf conflicts between attempted installs of caching-nameserver-7.3-5.FC5 and bind-9.3.2-20.FC5 ERROR: yum failed with 1 exit code which obviously causes the template creation to fail. The same process worked fine for Centos-4. I guess I have two options: 1) try and fix the problem 2) use the snapshot for FC5 Does anyone know if (1) is possible and if so how to do it? Colin -- -- Colin Campbell Unix Support/Postmaster/Hostmaster Citec +61 7 3227 6334
Colin, They did something weird in FC5 :( What you should do to fix it is edit the file named /vz/template/fedora-core/5/i386/config/default.list and change "caching-nameserver" to "bind-config" in it. We will provide the updated packages for fc5 metadata soon (early next week). Regards, Kir. Colin Campbell wrote: >Hi, > >I didn't download the Fedora Core 5 snapshot, preferring to build the OS >template cache from scratch. The only problem is that I get the >following error: > >Transaction Check Error: file /etc/named.conf conflicts between >attempted installs of caching-nameserver-7.3-5.FC5 and bind-9.3.2-20.FC5 >ERROR: yum failed with 1 exit code > >which obviously causes the template creation to fail. > >The same process worked fine for Centos-4. >(Continue reading)
Hello all, patch-026test009-combined does not apply cleanly to 2.6.16.14, but does to 2.6.16. The date on the patch file is April 20, so presumably it does not have all the -stable updates. Does anyone know which ones are missing? I suppose I could find out the hard way, by attempting to apply each one, but if someone else already knows ...
026test009 kernel includes mainstream patches up to 2.6.16.8. What is inside our kernels you can check on git (http://git.openvz.org). On Git we already have more recent 026test011 kernel which will be released soon. If you care for security, I must note that 026test009 has lack for these 2 patches only: [PATCH] smbfs chroot issue (CVE-2006-1864) [PATCH] i386/x86-64: Fix x87 information leak between processes (CVE-2006-1056) The first one is relevant only if you do chroot on smbfs, which is unlikely :) The second one is minor and is a small information leak (1 bit from FPU AFAIR). So you need to apply a patch 2.6.16.8 -> 2.6.16.14 if you want. Kirill John Kelly wrote: > Hello all, > > patch-026test009-combined does not apply cleanly to 2.6.16.14, but > does to 2.6.16. > > The date on the patch file is April 20, so presumably it does not have > all the -stable updates. Does anyone know which ones are missing? > > I suppose I could find out the hard way, by attempting to apply each > one, but if someone else already knows ... >(Continue reading)
Joe, depends on applications inside VEs. You can run anywhere from 1 to 100 or more. |-----Original Message----- |From: users-bounces@... [mailto:users-bounces@...] On |Behalf Of Joe Lee |Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 8:03 PM |To: users@... |Subject: [Users] How many VM on a Host | |Hi All, | |With a P4 2.4GHz, 4G RAM, 300G HD - How many VMs I can expect to run on |this machine configuration. |Also, I'll be interested to know what other type of HW configuration |specs others are using and how many VMs they are |able to run - In live production sites! |-joe | | |_______________________________________________ |Users mailing list |Users@... |https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/users
RSS Feed21 | |
|---|---|
23 | |
24 | |
22 | |
36 | |
23 | |
42 | |
29 | |
72 | |
29 | |
49 | |
41 | |
56 | |
64 | |
113 | |
31 | |
46 | |
39 | |
83 | |
55 | |
40 | |
66 | |
8 | |
33 | |
75 | |
30 | |
33 | |
17 | |
21 | |
37 | |
41 | |
11 | |
52 | |
46 | |
122 | |
76 | |
48 | |
88 | |
67 | |
61 | |
86 | |
53 | |
57 | |
22 | |
45 | |
47 | |
42 | |
50 | |
28 | |
25 | |
58 | |
53 | |
130 | |
92 | |
94 | |
35 | |
93 | |
95 | |
65 | |
70 | |
107 | |
41 | |
68 | |
81 | |
104 | |
208 | |
85 | |
80 | |
92 | |
62 | |
51 | |
54 | |
98 | |
95 | |
147 | |
56 | |
55 | |
77 | |
50 | |
47 | |
23 | |
43 | |
15 | |
39 | |
62 | |
19 | |
66 | |
36 | |
3 | |
8 | |
18 | |
1 |
