headers
Luca Deri | 1 Aug 2003 14:59

Re: Embedded NTOP

Mike,
you can see a preview of the future box (this is a pre-release box) 
here: http://luca.ntop.org/nBox3/screenshots/

1. The box has 3 x 10/100 Mbit interfaces or 2x10/100 + 1GE
2. a x86-like (Via C3) with > 1'000 Bogomips (~mid-range Pentium3)
3. fanless, based on a compact flash (boot in ~13 sec). Ram+flash are 
user expandable
4. it does include ntop, 2xnProbe and firewalling capabilities
5. it can work in pass-through mode (eth0 is used for accessing the 
box/emitting flows, eth1/eth2 can be put in bridge mode or used to 
monitor two different network trunks)
6. we plan to introduce it by the end of this month at a price similar 
to the old nBox

Anyone who wants to test-drive it or know more about it please drop me a 
mail.

Cheers, Luca

Michel Lapointe wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>I would like to receive your suggestion or comments on the following
>scenario.
>
>I'm considering setting some hardware boxes in different location to
>monitor traffics usage.
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Adam Beach | 1 Aug 2003 17:50

Problem Report Id: PR_PRTZU2

Ntop is pretty nifty but it has yet to run for over 4 days before it stops.
This is the only program that the computer is running.  Please let me know
if there is any other information you require to resolve this problem.

  n t o p   v e r s i o n  '2.2.4'  p r o b l e m   r e p o r t

From:  Adam Beach

EMail: abeach <at> wxc.com

Date:  2003-08-01 12:48:54 GMT

Problem Report Id: PR_PRTZU2

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary

OS: Windows NT   version: 4.0 SP 6a

ntop from: win32 binary (rpm, source, ports, etc.)

Hardware:  CPU:           PII 400 (i86, SPARC, etc.)
           # Processors:  1
           Memory:        256 MB
Network:
Merged packet counts:
     Ethernet:           ?
     Broadcast:          ?
     IP:                 ?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 8 comments |
headers
Tim_Cahoon | 4 Aug 2003 07:04

Out of office

I will be out of the office starting  08/02/2003 and will not return until
08/11/2003.

If you have a problem regarding the Federal-Mogul Wide Area Network, please
call the Southfield Network Control Center at 248-354-8974 or 8975 and they
will assist you or locate someone from the WAN Team who can.

If you have a question regarding Fiberlink please call the St. Louis
helpdesk. (314-512-8181)
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Frank Altpeter | 4 Aug 2003 14:58
Picon

Repost: Problem report


hi there,

so far i didn't receive any response or at least some receipt
acknowledgement.
I just detected, after long waiting for an answer, that the bug
report was being held by mailman and no one cared about it.

It's possible to have such mails go through the list
automatically with mailman, just because of the string
' n t o p   v e r s i o n '?.?'  p r o b l e m   r e p o r t' as
given in the report template.

BTW: http://www.ntop.org/needHelp.html does refer to
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=17233 for bug reports, but
there is no bugtracking module active, and the feature request
module seems to be quite out-of-date ...

With kind regards,

	Frank Altpeter
Picon
From: Frank Altpeter <f.altpeter <at> broadnet-mediascape.de>
Subject: problem report
Date: 2003-06-23 07:11:14 GMT
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Lawrence Baldwin | 4 Aug 2003 15:59
Favicon

Unable to open interface \Device\õbøw.

HI,

I have a host with TWO Ethernet adapters.
Nprobe is working fine if I select Interface #0, e.g;

nprobe /c -i 0

However, I get the following error if I try to select Interface #1:

C:\NPROBE\NPROBE\Package>nprobe /c -i 1
Running nProbe for Win32.
04/Aug/2003 09:53:34 [NPROBE.C:1510] WARNING: -n parameter is missing.
127.0.0.1:2055 will be used.
04/Aug/2003 09:53:35 [NPROBE.C:914] Exporting NetFlow v5 flows towards
127.0.0.1:2055
04/Aug/2003 09:53:35 [NPROBE.C:1564] Welcome to nprobe v.2.0.1 for Win32
04/Aug/2003 09:53:35 [NPROBE.C:1606] Unable to open interface \Device\õbøw.

I have Ethereal installed on this host and it has no problem selecting the
second Ethernet adapter it shows up in the interface list as:

/Device/NPF_{B04B1B23-23BD-4860-BE81-C7B805D298C8}

What's going on?

Regards,

Lawrence Baldwin
myNetWatchman.com
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
B. Loïc | 5 Aug 2003 11:53
Picon

Building with openssl : can't find existing ssl.h

Hello,

Trying to configure ntop 2.2c with ssl support on Linux RH (7.1 and 9),
I get the following warning :

checking openssl/ssl.h usability... no
checking openssl/ssl.h presence... no
checking for openssl/ssl.h... no
[...]
checking for openSSL... configure: WARNING: error

*******************************************************************
*
* WARNING:  One or more items required for openSSL are missing:
*           (yes means it was found, no means it was not found)
*
*                  openssl/crypto.h...yes
*                  openssl/err.h...yes
*                  openssl/pem.h...yes
*                  openssl/rsa.h...yes
*                  openssl/ssl.h...no
*                  openssl/x509.h...yes
*                  libssl.so or libssl.a...yes
*
*>>>    ntop will be built without openSSL
*
*???     1. Install the necessary headers and libraries.
*???    and rerun ./configure
*
*******************************************************************
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
cvs-commit | 5 Aug 2003 16:47

New ntop commit (author deri)

Update of /export/home/ntop/ntop
In directory jabber:/tmp/cvs-serv20346

Modified Files:
	configure configure.in address.c globals-report.h 
	globals-structtypes.h graph.c http.c main.c report.c 
	reportUtils.c util.c 
Log Message:

Some bugfixing:
1. hosts names are now resolved and used correctly (ntop used to resolve
   names but not to use the symbolic for all hosts)
2. Added a patch tp the pie chart courtesy of Robbert Kouprie
3. Added an enhancement courtesy of Luigi Iotti <luigi <at> iotti.biz>: some reports
   on the top right position contain three links that allow you to restict
   the view to selected hosts.
4. Version moved to 2.2.90. Version 2.3 is on the way. Report your bugs ASAP.
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Luca Deri | 5 Aug 2003 16:49

On the way to 2.3

Dear all,
2.2.4 was stable for me, I have now moved the version to 2.2.90. This 
means that version 2.3 is a few weeks away. If you have bugs etc. please 
let me know now before the new version release. You're still in time for 
small enhancement, too late for large enhancements that will be part of 2.4.

Cheers, Luca

--

-- 
Luca Deri <deri <at> ntop.org>	http://luca.ntop.org/
Hacker: someone who loves to program and enjoys being
clever about it - Richard Stallman
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Burton M. Strauss III | 5 Aug 2003 19:03

RE: Building with openssl : can't find existing ssl.h

What did you use for the --with-ossl-xxxx parameters?

If it's not in the STANDARD locations, e.g. /usr/include/xxxx.h and a few
other, system specific values, you must tell gcc where to look.

-----Burton

-----Original Message-----
From: ntop-dev-admin <at> unipi.it [mailto:ntop-dev-admin <at> unipi.it]On Behalf
Of B. Loïc
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:54 AM
To: ntop-dev <at> Unipi.IT
Subject: [Ntop-dev] Building with openssl : can't find existing ssl.h

Hello,

Trying to configure ntop 2.2c with ssl support on Linux RH (7.1 and 9),
I get the following warning :

checking openssl/ssl.h usability... no
checking openssl/ssl.h presence... no
checking for openssl/ssl.h... no
[...]
checking for openSSL... configure: WARNING: error

*******************************************************************
*
* WARNING:  One or more items required for openSSL are missing:
*           (yes means it was found, no means it was not found)
*
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Burton M. Strauss III | 5 Aug 2003 20:13

Known problems - count down list for 2.3 - 1st cut

This is from my email folders...  yes, I'm being difficult - unless you
reported it via a PR_ or we solved it immediately, it's not on this list.
S'be'it.

If your name is here (other than 'FIXED'), you should receive a direct copy
of this email.  Replies to the list, please.

AFAIK, all OPEN items are awaiting action from Luca...

"user needs to test under 2.2.x" - should be self-explanatory - is it still
broken under 2.2.90?

"waiting for reply from user" - means the last email I have is from me to
you, asking for clarifications or more information.

-----Burton

US-based commercial support for ntop:
     http://www.ntopsupport.com
     mailto:info <at> ntopsupport.com

Search the ntop mailing lists at gmane:
     http://search.gmane.org

HowTo Ask for Help at
     http://snapshot.ntop.org/faq.php#83

2.3 Known Problems

Open
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 7 comments |

Gmane