headers
Cruise X Overide | 1 Jul 2006 01:33
Picon

Re: vsFTPD error 530

On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 15:07 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Cruise X Overide <cruiseoveride <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > i have used the default configuration file,
> > and the error i get is exactly wat i said. i followed the book to a T.
> > do i need to subscribe to be on the BLFS list?
> 
> Yes.  But in the meantime, you should know that you need to do more
> configuration for vsftpd than is in the book.  The BLFS team can't
> decide how you want to configure your server.
> 
> http://vsftpd.beasts.org/vsftpd_conf.html
> 
> --
> Dan

i have made the necessary changes in the conf file to allow local users
to login, the same configuration, seems to work on my fedora machine. i
feel there is a problem with how the ftp server authenticates to login
or pam, but i cannot see any errors except the 530. all local users are
able to login on the tty consoles, and the user_list deny and allow,
seems to work (tcp wrappers) but no user, or root , except for anonymous
is able to login to the ftp.
Any suggestions? 
Has anyone got ftp working?

--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
Randy McMurchy | 1 Jul 2006 01:35

Re: vsFTPD error 530

Cruise X Overide wrote these words on 06/30/06 18:33 CST:
> all local users are
> able to login on the tty consoles, and the user_list deny and allow,
> seems to work (tcp wrappers) but no user, or root , except for anonymous
> is able to login to the ftp.

What about /etc/shells? I notice you didn't list that file. Depending
on the FTP server (I'm not sure about vsFTPD), the server may require
it in order to authenticate users.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
18:33:00 up 49 days, 10:33, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.06, 0.01
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Dan Nicholson | 1 Jul 2006 01:55
Picon

Re: vsFTPD error 530

On 6/30/06, Cruise X Overide <cruiseoveride <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> i have made the necessary changes in the conf file to allow local users
> to login, the same configuration, seems to work on my fedora machine. i
> feel there is a problem with how the ftp server authenticates to login
> or pam, but i cannot see any errors except the 530. all local users are
> able to login on the tty consoles, and the user_list deny and allow,
> seems to work (tcp wrappers) but no user, or root , except for anonymous
> is able to login to the ftp.
> Any suggestions?
> Has anyone got ftp working?

I've gotten it working before, but there's still two problems here.
First, could you please bring the discussion to blfs-support? Second,
please post your configuration or error logs or anything else. It's
hard to help debug your problem when you just say it's not working.
I'm not trying to be a jerk about this.

--
Dan
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Wei Hu | 1 Jul 2006 03:14
Picon

Re: Anyone succesfully set up LFS on colinux?

On 6/30/06, Ken Moffat <ken <at> linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 04:52:07PM -0400, Wei Hu wrote:
> > However, after I set up everything and reboot, udev seemed to not work
> > properly.
> > After it output "Populating /dev with device nodes" for a while it
> > reported a red [Failure] to me.
> > Afterwards a lot of programs reported errors related to some files or
> > devices missing, and then the system froze.
> >
>
>  Probably, the sysfs changes since 2.6.12 (I think they were mainly
> between 2.6.14 and 2.6.15) are to blame.  One reason you didn't find
> anything on google is that this has nothing to do with colinux, but
> the main reason is that you are going against the grain - there were
> some issues in upgrading to a newer kernel with the old udev, but
> almost nobody attempts to use an older kernel with newer userspace.
>
>  You have a kernel config , so why don't you use the version of
> 2.6.16 in the book (or the current 2.6.16 version), copy that config
> to .config, then answer each of the questions from 'make oldconfig'
> ?

The problem is that in order to run Linux kernel on top of Windows,
colinux has to patch Linux's source code.  Up till now they only have
patch for 2.6.12, so I won't be able to get 2.6.16 working.

I guess I'll either have to wait until the patch for 2.6.16 come out,
or figure out the version of udev my working Gentoo is using.
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 10 comments |
headers
Dan Nicholson | 1 Jul 2006 06:59
Picon

Re: Anyone succesfully set up LFS on colinux?

On 6/30/06, Wei Hu <wei.hoo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Ken Moffat <ken <at> linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> >
> >  You have a kernel config , so why don't you use the version of
> > 2.6.16 in the book (or the current 2.6.16 version), copy that config
> > to .config, then answer each of the questions from 'make oldconfig'
> > ?
>
> The problem is that in order to run Linux kernel on top of Windows,
> colinux has to patch Linux's source code.  Up till now they only have
> patch for 2.6.12, so I won't be able to get 2.6.16 working.

Am I the only one that's really confused? Is your intention to run LFS
over Windows?

--
Dan
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Wei Hu | 1 Jul 2006 08:29
Picon

Re: Anyone succesfully set up LFS on colinux?

On 7/1/06, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/30/06, Wei Hu <wei.hoo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/30/06, Ken Moffat <ken <at> linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >  You have a kernel config , so why don't you use the version of
> > > 2.6.16 in the book (or the current 2.6.16 version), copy that config
> > > to .config, then answer each of the questions from 'make oldconfig'
> > > ?
> >
> > The problem is that in order to run Linux kernel on top of Windows,
> > colinux has to patch Linux's source code.  Up till now they only have
> > patch for 2.6.12, so I won't be able to get 2.6.16 working.
>
> Am I the only one that's really confused? Is your intention to run LFS
> over Windows?

Well, colinux (www.colinux.org) is a way to virtualize linux so that
it can run in Windows.  Most part of it is run natively so the speed
is pretty fast.
Although it feels pretty much like a real Linux, it is not as
transparent as VMWare, e.g., the kernel needs to be patched.
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Wei Hu | 1 Jul 2006 08:33
Picon

Re: Anyone succesfully set up LFS on colinux?

On 7/1/06, Wei Hu <wei.hoo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/06, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/30/06, Wei Hu <wei.hoo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 6/30/06, Ken Moffat <ken <at> linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  You have a kernel config , so why don't you use the version of
> > > > 2.6.16 in the book (or the current 2.6.16 version), copy that config
> > > > to .config, then answer each of the questions from 'make oldconfig'
> > > > ?
> > >
> > > The problem is that in order to run Linux kernel on top of Windows,
> > > colinux has to patch Linux's source code.  Up till now they only have
> > > patch for 2.6.12, so I won't be able to get 2.6.16 working.
> >
> > Am I the only one that's really confused? Is your intention to run LFS
> > over Windows?
>
> Well, colinux (www.colinux.org) is a way to virtualize linux so that
> it can run in Windows.  Most part of it is run natively so the speed
> is pretty fast.
> Although it feels pretty much like a real Linux, it is not as
> transparent as VMWare, e.g., the kernel needs to be patched.
>

In other words, colinux is not a distro.  It's comparable to VMWare and Xen.
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
lfs | 1 Jul 2006 10:49

Problems with Glibc


Has started to install Glibc after a command make errors was not
But after make check there was a an
error

.4/nss:/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/nis:/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/rt:/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/resolv:/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/crypt:/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/nptl/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/nptl/tst-clock2> /lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/nptl/tst-clock2.out
make [2]: *** [/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/nptl/tst-clock2.out] Error 1
make [2]: Leaving directory `/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.4/glibc-2.3.4/nptl '
make [1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make [1]: Leaving directory `/lfs/sources/glibc--2.3.4/glibc-2.3.4 '
make: *** [check] Error 2

What do I do not so?

-- 

 lfs                          mailto:lfs <at> alnet.kz

--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Ken Moffat | 1 Jul 2006 13:06
Picon
Favicon

Re: Anyone succesfully set up LFS on colinux?

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 09:14:18PM -0400, Wei Hu wrote:
> 
> The problem is that in order to run Linux kernel on top of Windows,
> colinux has to patch Linux's source code.  Up till now they only have
> patch for 2.6.12, so I won't be able to get 2.6.16 working.
> 
> I guess I'll either have to wait until the patch for 2.6.16 come out,
> or figure out the version of udev my working Gentoo is using.

 Ah, I didn't understand you were running on top of that pile
of^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hother OS.

 You probably need earlier bootscripts as well - I'm guessing the
lfs-bootscripts-20051223 tarball might fit the bill, if you can find
it, plus something like udev-071 and hotplug-2004_09_23.

 Ideally, pick a version of the book from early January to see how
hotplug, udev, and those bootscripts get handled.

Ken
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Dan Nicholson | 1 Jul 2006 15:49
Picon

Re: Anyone succesfully set up LFS on colinux?

On 6/30/06, Wei Hu <wei.hoo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/1/06, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Am I the only one that's really confused? Is your intention to run LFS
> > over Windows?
>
> Well, colinux (www.colinux.org) is a way to virtualize linux so that
> it can run in Windows.  Most part of it is run natively so the speed
> is pretty fast.
> Although it feels pretty much like a real Linux, it is not as
> transparent as VMWare, e.g., the kernel needs to be patched.

OK. I understand what colinux is. My question is, what are you trying
to do? Are you trying to make your own colinux with LFS? Obviously,
you're not doing the stock build or this would be a lot simpler.

--
Dan
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane