headers
DJ Lucas | 1 Dec 2005 04:47
Picon
Favicon

Re: OOo2 Build Instructions Gimped

Jeremy Byron wrote:

> 
> 
> Sorry, I wasn't aware of the use of the files, just the existence of the 
> same sort of issue.  People could also conceivably cross-compile for a 
> 486/586 machine from a faster one; how fast it would run on such a 
> machine isn't really an issue.  As for FreeBSD.. I plead ignorance 
> again; of course you don't need to support that (though, if you do end 
> up making a patch for the files I think you should support, another file 
> wouldn't hurt matters for the sake of consistency).
> 
> Regards,
> Jeremy.

Okay...I prefer seds for education where practical:

sed -i '/^ARCH_FLAGS\*=/d' solenv/inc/unx{lngi{4,5,6},fbsdi}.mk

:-)

-- DJ Lucas

--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
DJ Lucas | 1 Dec 2005 04:58
Picon
Favicon

Re: sound-juicer

Randy McMurchy wrote:

> why not just try to use current versions and see what happens?

I can confirm that the segfault is gone with the new version of 
GTK+....now to figure out how to recreate those gstreamer profiles that 
I shouldn't have deleted. :-)

-- DJ Lucas
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Hans-Joachim Widmaier | 1 Dec 2005 20:32
Picon

Firefox-1.5 and profiles

Hi all you knowledgable people,

I'm sorry but I just don't understand it. I used almost every
version of firebird from 1.0 to 1.0.7, some compiled the
"classical" BLFS way, some the "Mozilla" way. All of them
worked quite nicely, and all of them let me run 2 instances at
once with different profiles ('firefox -P profile1',
'firefox -P profile2'). From the first Deer Park I tried up to
the final 1.5, this doesn't work anymore. Today I did try said
1.5 with '--disable-profilesharing' and a second time with
'--enable-profilesharing'. I cannot see any difference. I *can*
start firefox with one of the two profiles, but when I try to
run a second instance with the other profile, I get another
one of the first. No way I can have 2 different profiles running
at once ... So I simply don't get this profile sharing thing.
Or is this something different? Any help on how to restore
my beloved functionality would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
-- 
Hans-Joachim Widmaier
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |
headers
Archaic | 2 Dec 2005 03:40
Picon
Favicon

Re: Firefox-1.5 and profiles

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:32:43PM +0100, Hans-Joachim Widmaier wrote:
> 
> Any help on how to restore my beloved functionality would be greatly
> appreciated.

Wow, there exists a person who actually *wants* multiple profiles? We
spent a lot of time getting around that hassle. :/

-- 
Archaic

Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs

--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Bruce Dubbs | 2 Dec 2005 04:55

qt

I'm working with qt on a fresh lfs-dev system.  The latest suitable for
KDE is version 3.3.5.  I've built about all the dependencies and am
trying to get qt validated.

My access is via a chroot from an LFS 6.1 system.

During the make, I am getting a segfault from the built uic application.
 I went back and tried version 3.3.4 which is known to work with a gcc4
compiler and it segfaults too.

There was a message in blfs-support in September about this in
blfs-support, but I didn't see a solution.  Is this a chroot issue?

Has anyone else seen this problem?

  -- Bruce
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 4 comments |
headers
Bruce Dubbs | 2 Dec 2005 07:09

Re: qt

Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm working with qt on a fresh lfs-dev system.  The latest suitable for
> KDE is version 3.3.5.  I've built about all the dependencies and am
> trying to get qt validated.
> 
> My access is via a chroot from an LFS 6.1 system.
> 
> During the make, I am getting a segfault from the built uic application.
>  I went back and tried version 3.3.4 which is known to work with a gcc4
> compiler and it segfaults too.
> 
> There was a message in blfs-support in September about this in
> blfs-support, but I didn't see a solution.  Is this a chroot issue?

Answering my own post, it looks like it is a chroot issue.  When
rebooting into the LFS-dev system and running the same commands, qt
builds fine.  I can't test it until I've built KDE, but I suspect it
will be OK.

Perhaps there should be a warning in the book that building qt in a
chroot environment may cause a failure to build.

  -- Bruce
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 3 comments |
headers
Justin R. Knierim | 2 Dec 2005 08:00
Favicon

[Announce] LFS LiveCD 6.1.1-1 Released

The LFS LiveCD Team is proud to announce the release of the x86-6.1.1-1 
version of the LFS LiveCD.  This version is built using LFS 6.1.1 and 
BLFS packages from the svn branch.  Packages for LFS 6.1.1 are included 
on the LiveCD.  Other new features:

*  XFCE Terminal with helpful menus, including copy and paste
*  jhalfs 0.2 included
*  LFS 6.1.1 nALFS Profile
*  More new packages:  rsync, sudo, wireless_tools

Please mail any comments to the LFS LiveCD mailing list.

To download the new LiveCD, visit the LFS LiveCD download page for a 
list of mirrors:

http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/livecd/download.html

At the time this announcement was sent, not all mirrors have synced. 

-- 
Justin R. Knierim
lfs at lfs dash matrix dot net
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 5 comments |
headers
Mukesh Kaushal | 2 Dec 2005 08:29
Picon

Re: [Announce] LFS LiveCD 6.1.1-1 Released

Congrats to all of the members of the LFS team. This is really a great
achievement for us.

" Gossip is like a photograph. It starts with a negative, then is developed
and enlarged...."
---
Regards
Mukesh Kaushal
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin R. Knierim" <lfs <at> lfs-matrix.net>
To: "Development of LFS LiveCD" <livecd <at> linuxfromscratch.org>; "LFS Support
List" <lfs-support <at> linuxfromscratch.org>; "ALFS Discussion and Development
List" <alfs-discuss <at> linuxfromscratch.org>;
<blfs-support <at> linuxfromscratch.org>; "LFS Developers Mailinglist"
<lfs-dev <at> linuxfromscratch.org>; "BLFS Development List"
<blfs-dev <at> linuxfromscratch.org>; <lfs-security <at> linuxfromscratch.org>;
<lfs-announce <at> linuxfromscratch.org>
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 12:30 PM
Subject: [Announce] LFS LiveCD 6.1.1-1 Released

The LFS LiveCD Team is proud to announce the release of the x86-6.1.1-1
version of the LFS LiveCD.  This version is built using LFS 6.1.1 and
BLFS packages from the svn branch.  Packages for LFS 6.1.1 are included
on the LiveCD.  Other new features:

*  XFCE Terminal with helpful menus, including copy and paste
*  jhalfs 0.2 included
*  LFS 6.1.1 nALFS Profile
*  More new packages:  rsync, sudo, wireless_tools
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply | 0 comments |
headers
Chris Staub | 2 Dec 2005 20:10

Re: qt

Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 
> Answering my own post, it looks like it is a chroot issue.  When
> rebooting into the LFS-dev system and running the same commands, qt
> builds fine.  I can't test it until I've built KDE, but I suspect it
> will be OK.
> 
> Perhaps there should be a warning in the book that building qt in a
> chroot environment may cause a failure to build.
> 
>   -- Bruce

Why not just say it's not recommended to build *anything* in chroot 
(unless you have to).
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 2 comments |
headers
M.Canales.es | 2 Dec 2005 20:15
Picon
Favicon

Re: qt

El Viernes, 2 de Diciembre de 2005 20:10, Chris Staub escribió:

> Why not just say it's not recommended to build *anything* in chroot
> (unless you have to).

Building in chroot allow to create a new full LFS+BLFS system while using the 
existing old one.

-- 
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886:       http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.com
TLDP-ES:                           http://es.tldp.org
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Permalink | Reply | 1 comment |

Gmane