Tomeu Vizoso | 1 Mar 11:54
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: wiki_laptop_org/go/Specifications

On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 18:03, Eben Eliason <eben <at> laptop.org> wrote:
> Well, I'm uncertain, mostly because some of the specs are outdated,
> many others incomplete, etc.  What might be better is to migrate a
> skeleton, and have developers add additional topics which need a spec,
> thus encouraging the design team (myself very much included) to
> revisit these areas and polish up the details, pulling from the old
> specs as appropriate.
>
> How do others feel?

Yeah, feel similarly. Wonder if someone could share their opinions
about how projects like fedora and ubuntu manage the feature proposals
for every release?

Thanks,

Tomeu

> - Eben
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:28 PM, David Farning <dfarning <at> sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>> A couple of weeks ago I recieved a request to migrate
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Specifications .
>>
>> Unless I hear otherwise, I will migrate that pages to the Development
>> team in a few days.
>>
>> thanks
>> david
(Continue reading)

Tomeu Vizoso | 1 Mar 11:58
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 Release Candidate 2 (0.83.6)

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 23:08,  <david <at> lang.hm> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> david <at> lang.hm wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Sugar Community,
>>>>
>>>> this is Release Candidate 2 for the upcoming 0.84 Release - see the [1]
>>>> for more details. Only one more week to go in this release cycle. Please
>>>> test this release and report all the bugs you find that we are able to
>>>> fix them in time. A friendly BugSquad [2] will be available to triage
>>>> those bugs accordingly and the developers can never have enough bug
>>>> food. If you have non-bug feedback about features you can use the
>>>> sugar-devel mailing list to share it with us.
>>>>
>>>> From a user point of view we want to highlight the following changes
>>>> that have been made:
>>>>
>>>> === Resume by Default ===
>>>> Resume by default is now the way we handle activity startup. The option
>>>> in the Favourites View palette has been removed completely. You can
>>>> still start a new instance using the 'Start' option in the Activity
>>>> palette.
>>>>
>>>> === View Source ===
>>>> There has been some refinements to the View Source dialog. You can
>>>> access it from the Activity palette in the Frame or by using
>>>> 'Shift+Alt+V' directly.
>>>
(Continue reading)

Tomeu Vizoso | 1 Mar 13:16
Favicon
Gravatar

move Low-level_Activity_API to the SLs wiki

Hi David, Bert and Wade,

should we move http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Low-level_Activity_API to the SLs wiki?

Regards,

Tomeu
Bert Freudenberg | 1 Mar 13:23
Picon
Gravatar

Re: move Low-level_Activity_API to the SLs wiki


On 01.03.2009, at 13:16, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:

> Hi David, Bert and Wade,
>
> should we move http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Low-level_Activity_API to  
> the SLs wiki?

Yes.

- Bert -
Gabriel Eirea | 1 Mar 13:41
Picon

Re: [IAEP] Fwd: [Bugs] #448 UNSP: Addons.sl.o doc category should be changed

As a reference, content in the Ceibal portal (ceibal.edu.uy) is
organized as follows ("areas of knowledge"):

Artistic
Natural sciences
Social sciences
Language
Mathematics
Second language/Foreign languages

(order is alphabetically in Spanish)

For sugar activities, a mix of educational and technical tags seems
reasonable, so you may have for example an activity tagged as "natural
sciences, games, search & discovery" or "artistic, media creation".

Regards,

Gabriel

2009/2/28 Gary C Martin <gary <at> garycmartin.com>:
> Just forwarding the below to IAEP to catch more educator/teacher type
> eyeballs:
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Gary C Martin <gary <at> garycmartin.com>
>> Date: 28 February 2009 15:54:17 GMT
>> To: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu <at> sugarlabs.org>
>> Cc: sugar-devel <at> lists.sugarlabs.org
(Continue reading)

Walter Bender | 1 Mar 16:02
Picon

[RELEASE] TurtleArt-38

== .xo ==

http://addons.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/downloads/file/25918/turtle_art-38.xo

== Source ==

http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/fructose/TurtleArt/TurtleArt-38.tar.bz2

== Features ==

* reorganized palettes to "deemphasize" some of the more esoteric blocks
* added beginning of de, sl, sv support
* updated zh_TW artwork

== Documentation ==

http://sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/TurtleArt

enjoy.

-walter

--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org

--

-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
(Continue reading)

Divya | 1 Mar 16:31
Picon

idea for gsoc 2009

Hello

I am into python development for last two and half years and looking forward to participate in gsoc 2009. I successfully participated in gsoc 2008 under GNU Project & developed gnome-gnowser. I used PyGTK & pydot for the development of gnome-gnowser and  currently I am in the process of porting my application i.e gnome-gnowser onto OLPC. Finding that I posses all the required skill sets to be sugar developer, I look forward to it. So can anyone guide on that as where to start from and if there is already any Ideas list of sugar-labs for gsoc 2009.

--
Regards
Divya

_______________________________________________
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel <at> lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Simon Schampijer | 1 Mar 17:02
Picon

[ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84 Tarballs Due

Dear Sucrose Maintainers,

please provide source tarballs for the Sucrose 0.84 Release [1] by the 
end of the Second of March and announce them as explained here:
http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release#Module_release

This will be our *Golden Image* - this is hard code freeze. Any fixes 
after this date will have to ask for an exception.

Please make sure to get your fixes in. For example here is a list of 
current Sugar bugs for 0.84 [2]

Thanks,
    Your Release Team

[1] http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Release/Roadmap#Schedule
[2] 
http://dev.sugarlabs.org/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&component=sugar&order=priority&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&milestone=0.84
Tomeu Vizoso | 1 Mar 18:27
Favicon
Gravatar

easier installation of soas

Hi,

I'm wondering if it may be possible to lower further the barrier for
the less technical users that want to download sugar on a stick.

Maybe we could offer a .zip for download that can be expanded on a
bootable usb stick and just work?

Regards,

Tomeu
Sameer Verma | 1 Mar 19:30

Re: [IAEP] Design ideas for a.sl.o and sugarlabs

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:51 PM, ,Josh williams
<joshcwilliams <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Wade,
>
> I agree with you that there needs to be a unity between the websites and
> things are definitely confusing. That design I made is basically a wire
> frame to give us an idea for the layout. I wanted it to follow the HIG
> guidelines, take into account Mick's comments, and just be simple for
> kids to use. A friend recently let me borrow an XO, so I'll be able to
> make something that's more to scale soon.

Sugar sites that kinda look like Sugar? That would be neat!

Sameer

> Thanks for the infrastructure
> ideas as well, they're a good start and I'll bring them up at the design
> meeting.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Josh
>
> Wade Brainerd wrote:
>> Hey Josh, thanks for the offer of help!
>>
>> I definitely like your simple and kid-friendly theme for addons. I
>> wonder off the top of my head though, if it makes sense to make
>> addons.sl.o look *more* like the other sl.o sites?    Things are kind
>> of confusing right now with the different styles of wiki, trac,
>> addons, schools, gitorious, api, buildbot, etc.  planet is the lone
>> exception, it seems to follow wiki.sugarlabs.org
>> <http://wiki.sugarlabs.org> nicely :)
>>
>> It would be great if the Design Team could comment on this decision.
>>
>> Here are a couple other web infrastructure ideas:
>>
>> + Improve theming consistency among various SL.o sites.
>> + Single sign on cookie among all SL.o sites - perhaps OpenID based.
>> + Standard nav header atop all SL.o sites rather than the various nav
>> headers in different places, with different links.
>> + Better splash page for Gitorious, looking more like GitWeb - a page
>> with a small search box at the top and the rest being a list of
>> projects, sorted by recent activity, showing owner and last commit details
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Wade
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:10 AM, ,Josh williams
>> <joshcwilliams <at> gmail.com <mailto:joshcwilliams <at> gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi, I'm working on the design of sugar labs add-ons with Mick Weiss.
>>     I've created a mock up at http://sugarlabs.org/go/AddonsPortal/Design
>>     but I've haven't been able to contact anyone on the design team as of
>>     yet. I would also like to volunteer some of my time for other
>>     projects.
>>     I'm primarily a front-end designer with XHTML/CSS JavaScript
>>     skills, but
>>     I also know some PHP/MySQL and have a background in Linux. I also
>>     enjoy
>>     creating icons, so if there are any activities developers that need
>>     icons please contact me. My portfolio is over at
>>     http://tucsonlabs.com .
>>
>>     If you're a member of the design team or have some use for my skills,
>>     please let me know.
>>
>>     Thanks
>>
>>     Josh
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>>     IAEP <at> lists.sugarlabs.org <mailto:IAEP <at> lists.sugarlabs.org>
>>     http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
>> IAEP <at> lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP <at> lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>

Gmane