11 Feb 2009 06:10
Re: ACPI regression in 2.6.29 - cpufreq_performance doesn't work
Mattia Dongili <malattia <at> linux.it>
2009-02-11 05:10:18 GMT
2009-02-11 05:10:18 GMT
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:15:35AM -0200, Guilherme Malschitzky Schroeder wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Mattia Dongili <malattia <at> linux.it> wrote:
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> > A: Top-posting.
> > Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 04:15:00AM -0200, Guilherme Malschitzky Schroeder wrote:
> >> yeah mattia, you were right about ondemand module was being used on
> >> cpu1, so i couldn't remove it.
> >> with this commited patch, both cpu's can now have different speeds.
> >
> > afair this has always been the case. the only difference the patch
> > introduces is telling the BIOS where the coordination is actually done.
> >> i was just comparing cat /proc/cpuinfo and didn't notice that cpu0 was
> >> at 2268MHz.
> >> cpufrequtils will need an update do deal with this change.
> >
> > why? what's wrong with cpufrequtils?
>
> The thing i said about changing cpufrequtils it's because cpufreq-set
> just set cpu0 governor.
> With 2.6.29, it'll need to change cpu1 too from what i have understood right?
>
> 2.6.28:
>
> # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu{0,1}/cpufreq/scaling_governor
> ondemand
> ondemand
> # cpufreq-set -g performance
(Continue reading)
RSS Feed