Wanted Urgently

新しいメールアドレスをお知らせします新しいメールアドレス： hansmond_201 <at> yahoo.co.jp

I am seeking your cooperation in building a Tourist Hotel or Real Estate in your country.I need an
experienced person like you to assist me to set up, develop the project.

Alternative Email:- hansmond24 <at> yahoo.com

Thanks and God bless.

Dr Raymond Hansmond.

- Dr Raymond Hansmond.

_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq <at> lists.linux.org.uk
http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq

[Bug 10564] Randomly sets max freq equal to min freq

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10564

------- Comment #9 from stonecrest <at> gmail.com  2008-05-03 07:41 -------
I just tried 2.6.25-git19, which has the above cpufreq commit, and still
observe the problem. 

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 10564] Randomly sets max freq equal to min freq

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10564

------- Comment #10 from stonecrest <at> gmail.com  2008-05-03 08:13 -------
I also now tried ignore_ppc=1. This is interesting, as cpufreq-info shows the
correct min/max frequencies, but I can tell that the issue is definitely not
resolved. Things were normal when I first booted up, but now I'm back to the
system not even being able to keep up with my typing and everything sluggish.
So despite cpufreq-info reporting the correct max freq, I don't know that
anything else fundamentally changed.

It looks like there are a number of people with this issue
(http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=363228#p363228), and they claim it
started with the 2.6.24 kernel. That's consistent with what I guessed, although
I have not yet verified that this was definitely the kernel version where
things changed. And I should note that I'm testing on the mainline kernel
without patches, despite the reference to Archlinux.

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[Bug 10564] Randomly sets max freq equal to min freq

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10564

trenn <at> suse.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |venkatesh.pallipadi <at> intel.co
                   |                            |m

------- Comment #11 from trenn <at> suse.de  2008-05-03 09:50 -------
> but now I'm back to the system not even being able to keep up with my typing
> and everything sluggish.
Puhh, could be the latest locking changes? Maybe irqs are held too long or
similar?

Scott, if you could do a git bisect, as you already know about which kernel
versions are affected it shouldn't be that much work...
If you could tell Venkatesh which patch it is then, it should be easy to fix.

You should spinlock debug compile in, maybe you already get a hint that
somewhere things get stuck for a while...

--

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

[PATCH] Remove p4_clockmode driver

Remove p4_clockmode driver

The driver is doing throttling which is supposed to be done through another
ACPI interface. If both interfaces are used, the machine may get very slow.
Remove this driver which should never be used.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn <at> suse.de>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig       |   20 -
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile      |    1 
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/p4-clockmod.c |  315 ------------------------------
 3 files changed, 336 deletions(-)

Index: linux-acpi-2.6_video_native_vs_vendor/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-acpi-2.6_video_native_vs_vendor.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ linux-acpi-2.6_video_native_vs_vendor/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
 <at>  <at>  -179,26 +179,6  <at>  <at>  config X86_SPEEDSTEP_SMI

 	  If in doubt, say N.

-config X86_P4_CLOCKMOD
-	tristate "Intel Pentium 4 clock modulation"
-	select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
-	help
-	  This adds the CPUFreq driver for Intel Pentium 4 / XEON
-	  processors.  When enabled it will lower CPU temperature by skipping
-	  clocks.
-

[PATCH] Remove deprecated speedstep-centrino driver

Remove deprecated speedstep-centrino driver

Not 100% sure whether there are machines out there that still need the
static Banias tables, Venkatesh?

Signed-off-by: Thomas Renninger <trenn <at> suse.de>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig              |   30 -
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Makefile             |    1 
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c |  634 -----------------------
 3 files changed, 665 deletions(-)

Index: linux-acpi-2.6_video_native_vs_vendor/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-acpi-2.6_video_native_vs_vendor.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
+++ linux-acpi-2.6_video_native_vs_vendor/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/Kconfig
 <at>  <at>  -122,36 +122,6  <at>  <at>  config X86_GX_SUSPMOD

 	 If in doubt, say N.

-config X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO
-	tristate "Intel Enhanced SpeedStep (deprecated)"
-	select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
-	select X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_TABLE if X86_32
-	depends on X86_32 || (X86_64 && ACPI_PROCESSOR)
-	help
-	  This is deprecated and this functionality is now merged into
-	  acpi_cpufreq (X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ). Use that driver instead of
-	  speedstep_centrino.

www.cleanplus.com/shop Own IT on the OTC Symbol FLKI

Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.

Clean Plus® Net'Polish Wet Wipes
Did you know Clean Plus®
Net'Polish Wipes...
Are made with high quality microfiber cloth
Have been formulated with "bodyshop safe" cleaner 
Remove light dirt, fingerprints, and smudges from painted finishes, chrome and glass
Leave a showroom finish 
Work on all finishes
Are blueberry scented 
Use in between car washes so your car always looks sparkling clean! For more information, please do not
hesitate to contact us at info <at> falkenltd.com or visit us online at www.cleanplus.com
Buy the stock! FLKI

To unsubscribe visit us at www.cleanplus.com

Copyright (C) 2007 Falken Industries. All rights reserved.

www.cleanplus.com

Forward this email to a friend 
_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq <at> lists.linux.org.uk
http://lists.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq

cpufreq and modular build

Hello.

I have a question regarding cpufreq and modular build.

Looking in Kconfig file for 2.6.24.5 kernel version I see this:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
config CPU_FREQ
        bool "CPU Frequency scaling"
        help
          CPU Frequency scaling allows you to change the clock speed of
          CPUs on the fly. This is a nice method to save power, because
          the lower the CPU clock speed, the less power the CPU consumes.

          Note that this driver doesn't automatically change the CPU
          clock speed, you need to either enable a dynamic cpufreq governor
          (see below) after boot, or use a userspace tool.

          To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
          module will be called cpufreq.

          For details, take a look at <file:Documentation/cpu-freq>.

          If in doubt, say N.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

So there's a discrepancy between the way this setting is added in the
Kconfig file and the help text.  Help text suggests this can be built as a
module, and there is also (some?) support for that in the source code,
but Kconfig file does not allow one to build it as a module.

MD List

MDs are always on the lookout for credible information on the latest healthcare products - now you can
spread the word

++> MD Mailing List +++

788,001 Total Records
594,355 Office Tel #
269,847 Fax #'s for the office
17,820 e-mails

Lots of MDs in specialties like Orthopedics, Surgery, Radiology, Dermatology, Neurology, General
Practice etc..

Over a dozen sortable fields

Cost just slashed -  $396

write to -   josephinestott <at> hotmail.com

valid thru May 9

to be taken off send us an email with 90749 in the heading

MD List

MDs are always on the lookout for credible information on the latest healthcare products - now you can
spread the word

++> MD Mailing List +++

788,001 Total Records
594,355 Office Tel #
269,847 Fax #'s for the office
17,820 e-mails

Lots of MDs in specialties like Orthopedics, Surgery, Radiology, Dermatology, Neurology, General
Practice etc..

Over a dozen sortable fields

Cost just slashed -  $396

write to -   josephinestott <at> hotmail.com

valid thru May 9

to be taken off send us an email with 90749 in the heading