R.Apel | 1 Nov 2004 10:47
Favicon

AW: New release of jakarta-commons-dbcp is old er than the previous one?

.hjc. only meant the hibernate cache provides
As there were no objections, IMO the release can be safely set to 3jpp

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: jpackage-discuss-bounces@...
[mailto:jpackage-discuss-bounces@...]Im Auftrag von Fernando Nasser
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 00:58
An: jpackage-discuss@...; Randy Watler
Betreff: [JPackage-discuss] New release of jakarta-commons-dbcp is older
than the previous one?

I don't know if this is intentional, but the version of 
jakarta-commons-dbcp in devel seems to be older than the previous one:

devel:  0:1.2.1-0.hjc.2jpp

free: 0:1.2.1-1jpp_1rh

This would cause the new 1.6 package to not replace the 1.5 one, right?

But perhaps this is intentional because of the cache addition?

Randy, what should we do about this?  Why not just 2jpp?

Regards,
Fernando
_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
JPackage-discuss@...
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
(Continue reading)

Fernando Nasser | 1 Nov 2004 17:35
Picon
Favicon

Re: AW: New release of jakarta-commons-dbcp is old er than the previous one?

I will regenerate it later today or tomorrow morning then.

Thanks.

Best regards and welcome back.

Fernando

R.Apel@... wrote:
> .hjc. only meant the hibernate cache provides
> As there were no objections, IMO the release can be safely set to 3jpp
> 
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: jpackage-discuss-bounces@...
> [mailto:jpackage-discuss-bounces@...]Im Auftrag von Fernando Nasser
> Gesendet: Freitag, 22. Oktober 2004 00:58
> An: jpackage-discuss@...; Randy Watler
> Betreff: [JPackage-discuss] New release of jakarta-commons-dbcp is older
> than the previous one?
> 
> 
> I don't know if this is intentional, but the version of 
> jakarta-commons-dbcp in devel seems to be older than the previous one:
> 
> devel:  0:1.2.1-0.hjc.2jpp
>  
> 
> free: 0:1.2.1-1jpp_1rh
> 
> This would cause the new 1.6 package to not replace the 1.5 one, right?
(Continue reading)

Mike | 2 Nov 2004 04:36
Favicon

Quick Enquiry

Hello folks,

New to this JPackage concept... I've been "Linux exclusive" and have enjoyed the
comforts of apt/yum'ing my RPMS for a long time now, so I'm not a complete
newbie, but bare with me.

I've always figured dowloading a .tar.bz2 of JBoss is easy enough, but I guess
yum'ing it would be pretty cool...

sooo... where is JBoss4.0.0?!

That's my questions. ;)

Mike
David Walluck | 2 Nov 2004 07:47
Favicon

Re: [JPackage-announce] [RPM (1.5)] jsch-0.1.17-2jpp

David Walluck wrote:

>Name        : jsch                         Relocations: (not relocatable)
>Version     : 0.1.17                            Vendor: JPackage Project
>  
>

Oops. I just clobbered 0.1.13 in 1.5 with this version.

First it was only one file, but that's enough to break the deps anyway, 
and anyway they're broken due to ant depends and whatever else.

Also it'd be nice if rpmupload checked the md5sum or sha1sum of the file 
before considering it uploaded.

--

-- 
Sincerely,

David Walluck
<david@...>
R.Apel | 2 Nov 2004 09:58
Favicon

AW: Quick Enquiry

Hi Mike,

unfortunately we don't have current Jbosses for the moment and we are aware of their importance. There are
some preliminary packages of isolated jboss4 modules (pre 4.0.0 release) in our devel repo and also a
3.2.5 in work. Most of the external dependencies of both have been packaged though. Regarding 3.2.5, it
depends from an very early version of tomcat5, so we either need to make a version-numer-in-name package
for this or patch 3.2.5 to work with current tomcat5. As we currently are concentrating in getting
JPackage-1.6 out, it seems to make more sense to focus on jbosses after having achieved that goal.

Cheers

Ralph

-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: jpackage-discuss-bounces@...
[mailto:jpackage-discuss-bounces@...]Im Auftrag von Mike
Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. November 2004 04:37
An: jpackage-discuss@...
Betreff: [JPackage-discuss] Quick Enquiry

Hello folks,

New to this JPackage concept... I've been "Linux exclusive" and have enjoyed the
comforts of apt/yum'ing my RPMS for a long time now, so I'm not a complete
newbie, but bare with me.

I've always figured dowloading a .tar.bz2 of JBoss is easy enough, but I guess
yum'ing it would be pretty cool...

sooo... where is JBoss4.0.0?!
(Continue reading)

Fernando Nasser | 2 Nov 2004 20:56
Picon
Favicon

Re: Self-contained classpathx-mail

Any resolution on this one?

Fernando

Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 02:50, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> 
>>On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 05:46, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>>
>>
>>>+  sed --in-place=.orig 's/gnu\(.\)inet/gnu\1mail\1inet/' $file
>>
>>In-place sed requires sed >= $iforget, which is not available eg. in
>>RHEL 2.1.  Perl would work...
>>
>>On a second thought, maybe a namespace starting with
>>org.jpackage.$something instead of gnu.mail.inet would be clearer so
>>everyone knows who to blame in case of problems :)
>>
>>Do we need the javax SASL classes here too (a dependency of inetlib)?
>>
> 
> 
> OK, here are updated patches.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continue reading)

Eberhard Fahle | 3 Nov 2004 11:07

Installing JDK1.5 on Suse 9.2

I just updated to new Suse-Linux 9.2 which is for the first time using 
jpackage to manage different version of the JRE/JDK. I need to install the 
JDK 1.5 on my machine but I really don't know how to do it. (I read the whole 
doc-section on the jpackage-site, but nothing there really got me started.) 

Are there any "step-by-step" installation-instructions regarding my problem?

I already sent a mail to the Suse-Installation-Support 6 days ago: no answer 
from there!

Any kind of hints, links, suggestions are higly appreaciated.

Eberhard Fahle
Nicolas Mailhot | 3 Nov 2004 11:26
Favicon

Re: Installing JDK1.5 on Suse 9.2

Le mercredi 03 novembre 2004 à 11:07 +0100, Eberhard Fahle a écrit :
> I just updated to new Suse-Linux 9.2 which is for the first time using 
> jpackage to manage different version of the JRE/JDK. I need to install the 
> JDK 1.5 on my machine but I really don't know how to do it. (I read the whole 
> doc-section on the jpackage-site, but nothing there really got me started.) 
> 
> Are there any "step-by-step" installation-instructions regarding my problem?

You need to follow http://jpackage.org/rebuilding.php after installing
jpackage-utils

Regards,

--

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
JPackage-discuss mailing list
JPackage-discuss@...
https://www.zarb.org/mailman/listinfo/jpackage-discuss
Eberhard Fahle | 3 Nov 2004 12:03

Re: Installing JDK1.5 on Suse 9.2

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> You need to follow http://jpackage.org/rebuilding.php after installing
> jpackage-utils

The jpackage-utils are already on my machine, but where do find the JDK 1.5 
sources from which to rebuild?

The summary for java-1.5.0-sun-1.5.0-2jpp.nosrc.rpm say its only the JRE not 
the JDK I'm looking for.

Eberhard
Davide Bolcioni | 3 Nov 2004 12:17
Picon

Permissions problem with tomcat4-4.1.30-2 ?

Greetings,
this morning I was faced with the following in catalina.out:

   3-nov-2004 10.46.52 org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol init
   INFO: Initializing Coyote HTTP/1.1 on port 8080
   GlobalResourcesLifecycleListener: Exception processing Global JNDI 
Resources javax.naming.NamingException: IOException writing to 
/usr/share/tomcat4/conf/tomcat-users.xml.new

and

    Starting service Tomcat-Standalone
    Apache Tomcat/4.1
    javax.naming.NamingException: IOException writing to 
/usr/share/tomcat4/conf/tomcat-users.xml.new

    Catalina.start: LifecycleException:  No UserDatabase component found 
under key UserDatabase
    LifecycleException:  No UserDatabase component found under key 
UserDatabase

Now, it goes without saying that as far as yesterday the above used
to work; I am still investigating whether a change occurred. To put
Tomcat back to work I moved tomcat-users.xml in the temp directory,
/var/cache/tomcat4/temp and this worked; my problem now is to diagnose
what happened exactly.

My findings so far:
- the platform is Fedora Core 1 and is kept up to date;
- /usr/share/tomcat4/conf is a symlink to /etc/tomcat4, as installed
(Continue reading)


Gmane