Jie Zhang | 15 Mar 17:39 2007
Picon

Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernel in sync

I just committed 2 patches in linux kernel and toolchain which will
break compatibility between them. Please use toolchain on trunk of
revision 1525 or later with linux-kernel on trunk of revision 2861 or
later and vice versa.

Jie
Mike Frysinger | 15 Mar 21:21 2007
Picon

Re: Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernel in sync

On 3/15/07, Jie Zhang <jzhang918@...> wrote:
> I just committed 2 patches in linux kernel and toolchain which will
> break compatibility between them. Please use toolchain on trunk of
> revision 1525 or later with linux-kernel on trunk of revision 2861 or
> later and vice versa.

i think we want this in 2007R1 too ... the idea is to try and get all
such user<->kernel space breaks done in this release
-mike
Hennerich, Michael | 15 Mar 21:43 2007

Re: Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernelin sync

>i think we want this in 2007R1 too ... the idea is to try and get all
>such user<->kernel space breaks done in this release

I agree - having another compatibility break shortly after the release (on trunk) is not doing any good.

Anyways I would appreciate if we could have more coherency between toolchain and kernel in the future. 

-Michael

>-----Original Message-----
>From: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@... [mailto:uclinux-dist-
>devel-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Mike Frysinger
>Sent: Donnerstag, 15. März 2007 21:21
>To: Jie Zhang
>Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@...; toolchain-
>devel@...
>Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] Attention: keep toolchain and linux
>kernelin sync
>
>On 3/15/07, Jie Zhang <jzhang918@...> wrote:
>> I just committed 2 patches in linux kernel and toolchain which will
>> break compatibility between them. Please use toolchain on trunk of
>> revision 1525 or later with linux-kernel on trunk of revision 2861 or
>> later and vice versa.
>
>i think we want this in 2007R1 too ... the idea is to try and get all
>such user<->kernel space breaks done in this release
>-mike
>_______________________________________________
>Uclinux-dist-devel mailing list
(Continue reading)

Mike Frysinger | 15 Mar 21:45 2007
Picon

Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernelin sync

On 3/15/07, Hennerich, Michael <Michael.Hennerich@...> wrote:
> Anyways I would appreciate if we could have more coherency between toolchain and kernel in the future.

that's what we're trying for with this release ... all this lkml input
should hopefully settle to bugfixes from here on out ...
-mike
Mariusz Kozlowski | 15 Mar 23:12 2007
Picon

[PATCH] blackfin: balance parenthesis in macros

Hello,

	This patch (against 2.6.21-rc3-mm1) balances parenthesis in blackfin
header files.

Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski <at> tuxland.pl>

 include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h |    4 ++--
 include/asm-blackfin/scatterlist.h      |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff -u linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-a/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-b/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h
--- linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-a/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h	2007-03-15
22:25:34.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-b/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h	2007-03-15
22:33:09.000000000 +0100
 <at>  <at>  -224,7 +224,7  <at>  <at> 
 #define UART0_LSR_TEMT			0x40	/* TSR and UARTx_thr both empty */

 #define UART0_MSR_ADDR		0xffc0180c	/* UART 0 Modem status register  16 bit */
-#define UART0_MSR			HALFWORD_REF(UART0_MSR_ADDR
+#define UART0_MSR			HALFWORD_REF(UART0_MSR_ADDR)
 #define UART0_SCR_ADDR		0xffc0180e	/* UART 0 Scratch register  16 bit */
 #define UART0_SCR			HALFWORD_REF(UART0_SCR_ADDR)
 #define UART0_IRCR_ADDR		0xffc01810	/* UART 0 IrDA Control register  16 bit */
 <at>  <at>  -331,7 +331,7  <at>  <at> 
 #define UART1_LSR_TEMT          0x40	/* TSR and UARTx_thr both empty */

 #define UART1_MSR_ADDR		0xffc01c0c	/* UART 1 Modem status register  16 bit */
-#define UART1_MSR			HALFWORD_REF(UART1_MSR_ADDR
(Continue reading)

Mike Frysinger | 15 Mar 23:26 2007
Picon

Re: [PATCH] blackfin: balance parenthesis in macros

On 3/15/07, Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...> wrote:
>         This patch (against 2.6.21-rc3-mm1) balances parenthesis in blackfin
> header files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...>

thanks, added to our repo
-mike
Wu, Bryan | 16 Mar 05:02 2007

Re: [PATCH] blackfin: balance parenthesis in macros

On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 18:12 -0400, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>         This patch (against 2.6.21-rc3-mm1) balances parenthesis in blackfin
> header files.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski <at> tuxland.pl>
> 
>  include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h |    4 ++--
>  include/asm-blackfin/scatterlist.h      |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff -u linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-a/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-b/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-a/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h      2007-03-15
22:25:34.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm1-b/include/asm-blackfin/mach-bf535/bf535.h      2007-03-15
22:33:09.000000000 +0100
>  <at>  <at>  -224,7 +224,7  <at>  <at> 
>  #define UART0_LSR_TEMT                 0x40    /* TSR and UARTx_thr both empty */
> 
>  #define UART0_MSR_ADDR         0xffc0180c      /* UART 0 Modem status register  16 bit */
> -#define UART0_MSR                      HALFWORD_REF(UART0_MSR_ADDR
> +#define UART0_MSR                      HALFWORD_REF(UART0_MSR_ADDR)
>  #define UART0_SCR_ADDR         0xffc0180e      /* UART 0 Scratch register  16 bit */
>  #define UART0_SCR                      HALFWORD_REF(UART0_SCR_ADDR)
>  #define UART0_IRCR_ADDR                0xffc01810      /* UART 0 IrDA Control register  16 bit */
>  <at>  <at>  -331,7 +331,7  <at>  <at> 
>  #define UART1_LSR_TEMT          0x40   /* TSR and UARTx_thr both empty */
> 
>  #define UART1_MSR_ADDR         0xffc01c0c      /* UART 1 Modem status register  16 bit */
(Continue reading)

Bernd Schmidt | 16 Mar 13:03 2007
Picon

Re: [toolchain-devel] Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernel in sync

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Jie Zhang <jzhang918@...> wrote:
>> I just committed 2 patches in linux kernel and toolchain which will
>> break compatibility between them. Please use toolchain on trunk of
>> revision 1525 or later with linux-kernel on trunk of revision 2861 or
>> later and vice versa.
> 
> i think we want this in 2007R1 too ... the idea is to try and get all
> such user<->kernel space breaks done in this release

While that would be nice, the branches are supposed to be frozen and 
this is a pretty large patch.  I'm not sure whether we want to 
invalidate the testing done so far.

Bernd
--

-- 
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH      Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6      80807 Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, Vincent Roche, Joseph E. McDonough
Zhang, Sonic | 19 Mar 03:27 2007

Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernel in sync

It is not a good idea to break the testing process and the release dead
line of 2007R1.
Maybe we can generate a sub release 2007R1.1 with this patch after
2007R1 is done.

Sonic 

-----Original Message-----
From: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@...
[mailto:uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@...] On
Behalf Of
Bernd Schmidt
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:04 PM
To: Mike Frysinger
Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@...;
toolchain-devel@...
Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [toolchain-devel] Attention: keep
toolchain and linux kernel in sync

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Jie Zhang <jzhang918@...> wrote:
>> I just committed 2 patches in linux kernel and toolchain which will 
>> break compatibility between them. Please use toolchain on trunk of 
>> revision 1525 or later with linux-kernel on trunk of revision 2861 or

>> later and vice versa.
> 
> i think we want this in 2007R1 too ... the idea is to try and get all 
> such user<->kernel space breaks done in this release

(Continue reading)

Jie Zhang | 19 Mar 04:24 2007
Picon

Re: [toolchain-devel] Attention: keep toolchain and linux kernel in sync

It will be a surprise for users that 2007R1.1 is not compatible with 2007R1.

Jie

On 3/19/07, Zhang, Sonic <Sonic.Zhang@...> wrote:
> It is not a good idea to break the testing process and the release dead
> line of 2007R1.
> Maybe we can generate a sub release 2007R1.1 with this patch after
> 2007R1 is done.
>
> Sonic
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@...
> [mailto:uclinux-dist-devel-bounces@...] On
Behalf Of
> Bernd Schmidt
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 8:04 PM
> To: Mike Frysinger
> Cc: uclinux-dist-devel@...;
> toolchain-devel@...
> Subject: Re: [Uclinux-dist-devel] [toolchain-devel] Attention: keep
> toolchain and linux kernel in sync
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 3/15/07, Jie Zhang <jzhang918@...> wrote:
> >> I just committed 2 patches in linux kernel and toolchain which will
> >> break compatibility between them. Please use toolchain on trunk of
> >> revision 1525 or later with linux-kernel on trunk of revision 2861 or
>
(Continue reading)


Gmane