Ryan Caron | 14 Aug 23:57 2014

Re: Error trying to set hamlib PTT in soundmodem

Was this issue ever resolved? soundmodem 0.18 is the default in the 
ubuntu 13+ and we're having issues with PTT over CAT cable method. On an 
FT-817 and an FT-897

73,
NX1U

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nate Bargmann | 13 Aug 17:45 2014
Picon

[Fwd: [hamlib] Add a tag name to hamlib_port_t. (#2)]

Ricky is proposing a slight change to rig.h.  You can view it here:

https://github.com/CodeBlock/hamlib/commit/a5d11e68c1b9377dd3f01745d93a5294bc9c43ee#diff-d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e

I am unsure what effect, if any, this will have on the API.  Ricky's
patch puts the name of the struct to line 1338 even though it is already
defined on line 1380.  Is this a problem (this is one of those areas of
C I am not well versed in)?

73, Nate

----- Forwarded message from Ricky Elrod <notifications <at> github.com> -----

Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 08:26:56 -0700
From: Ricky Elrod <notifications <at> github.com>
To: N0NB/hamlib <hamlib <at> noreply.github.com>
Subject: [hamlib] Add a tag name to hamlib_port_t. (#2)
Reply-To: N0NB/hamlib
	<reply+i-40166037-8a449d5bd94363623612fb39e63df1b7be8b0b9a-555821 <at> reply.github.com>

Note: I also sent this [upstream](https://sourceforge.net/p/hamlib/code/merge-requests/2/) but
there&#39;s another merge request there that has had no comments on it and has been open since February, so
I&#39;m sending my patch here too, in hopes that it at least doesn&#39;t get overlooked like [the other
person&#39;s](https://sourceforge.net/p/hamlib/code/merge-requests/1/) seems to have.

I am making a Haskell binding to hamlib and this anonymous struct was
creating some issues for me. I am not a C-coder by day, but I think this
is harmless to add here.

Signed-off-by: Ricky Elrod &lt;ricky <at> elrod.me&gt;
(Continue reading)

Andreas Kupries | 12 Aug 22:09 2014
Picon

2nd Call For Papers, 21th Annual Tcl/Tk Conference 2014

21'th Annual Tcl/Tk Conference (Tcl'2014)
http://www.tcl.tk/community/tcl2014/

[ It is 4 weeks to the deadline for Abstracts and proposals ... ]

November 10 - 14, 2014
Embassy Suites Downtown
Portland, Oregon, USA

Important Dates:

Abstracts and proposals due     Sep  8, 2014
Notification to authors         Sep 22, 2014
Author materials due            Oct 20, 2014
Tutorials start                 Nov 10, 2014
Conference starts               Nov 12, 2014

[[ 
        Registration is open.
]]

Email Contact:                tclconference <at> googlegroups.com

Submission of Summaries

Tcl/Tk 2014 will be held in Portland, Oregon, USA from November
10 - 14, 2014. The program committee is asking for papers and
presentation proposals from anyone using or developing with Tcl/Tk
(and extensions). Past conferences have seen submissions covering a
wide variety of topics including:
(Continue reading)

Hans Van Ingelgom | 11 Aug 06:32 2014
Picon

rotctld keep-alive?

Hello,

I'm refurbishing an antenna rotor, and I was thinking of using an embedded system running a rotctld tcp server as a controller. But I was wondering how to handle network failures. TCP has a bit of a problem detecting disconnects when there is no communication. Now suppose I send a command to turn the antenna, and then unplug the network cable (or the PC crashes). Is there a keep-alive in the protocol that allows me to detect this?

In practice, I assume most clients will continuously poll the current position. Can I use this polling to detect a network problem? I find no specifications about this, so I don't think this has been explicitly defined. I just don't feel that letting the motor run until it hits a hard limit is the right thing to do. If there is no more communication, the motor should stop for safety reasons, IMHO (especially since this is a rather beefy machine, it weights about 50kg and has quite a bit of power).


73
Hans - ON8VQ
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Hamlib-developer mailing list
Hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hamlib-developer
Nate Bargmann | 1 Aug 14:09 2014
Picon

Daily snapshots back online

Due to some time to convalesce after surgery, I finally got around to
fixing the issue with the VM (was a simple setting in the Virtual
Machine settings) and daily snapshots look to be going again.
Hopefully, as I begin to feel better in the coming weeks I'll have some
motivation to look over Hamlib again.  I'm always on the lookout for a
volunteer to help maintain the project.

73, Nate

--

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
Andrew Hart | 31 Jul 18:01 2014
Picon

Errors compiling in cygwin64

Received the following errors when trying to compile (I need support for the Icom-7100, which is not yet in there)

configure: WARNING: ws2tcpip.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: ws2tcpip.h:     check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: ws2tcpip.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: ws2tcpip.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: ws2tcpip.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
configure: WARNING:     ## ----------------------------------------------------- ##
configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net ##
configure: WARNING:     ## ----------------------------------------------------- ##

configure: WARNING: usb.h: present but cannot be compiled
configure: WARNING: usb.h:     check for missing prerequisite headers?
configure: WARNING: usb.h: see the Autoconf documentation
configure: WARNING: usb.h:     section "Present But Cannot Be Compiled"
configure: WARNING: usb.h: proceeding with the compiler's result
configure: WARNING:     ## ----------------------------------------------------- ##
configure: WARNING:     ## Report this to hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net ##



Andrew Hart C.Eng. MRINA
amateur radio calls G8VTV / VE3NVK / VA3AIT locator FN25bh

28, Chimo Drive, Kanata, ON, K2L 1A5 Canada

tel: 613 592 5043

The content of this message is NOT intended for the public, and is a private communication.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Hamlib-developer mailing list
Hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hamlib-developer
Nate Bargmann | 29 Jul 15:50 2014
Picon

[Fwd: Newcomer--Patrick, F1EBK]

I tried to release this message to the list, but goofed it in some
way...

73, Nate

----- Forwarded message from hamlib-developer-owner <at> lists.sourceforge.net -----

Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 23:36:56 +0200
From: Patrick <f1ebk <at> free.fr>
To: hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Newcomer
Reply-To: f1ebk <at> free.fr
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 

Hi all,

I am using hamlib since more than one year to control different
transceivers (TS-790, TS-2000) and had no problem  with it. Well, of
course i had troubles but hamlib was not involved in that, and all
problems are solved today.

I am using Ubuntu 12.04, and recently I moved to 14.04 with no
particular issue. All these transceivers where connected to the computer
by the mean of an interface box (Microham's MicroKeyer II) which comes
with it's piece of software... But everything was fine from the Hamlib
side.

Several weeks ago, I wanted to take the control of an old TS711 (okay,
i'm a Kenwood fan !). This kind of transceiver is rather old now, and
CAT control need a couple of interfaces to do the job. In this case to
prevent any problem, the transceiver is connected to the ttyS0 serial
port, an no audio is sent to the computer : this is the simplest CAT
test configuration that I could imagine. So I could fix all the hardware
issues that I met, and got control of the transceiver. I can change
mode, and event the RIT ( when you know how the RIT is handled by
Kenwood transceivers, this is really challenging ). But I never could
change the frequency... 

A short look on the rig matrix shows that the TS-771 has an untested
state. So could it be possible that the TS-711 has never been used with
Hamlib, and we have a problem in the frequency control ? 

If I can be of some help doing some test with the TS-711, I would really
be happy to do so.

Today, I am trying to control a rotator to get a full remote control of
the station, and of course got an issue with Rotctld. As this is a real
remote access, all communications are made by the mean of an SSH tunnel.
So I thought that adding the port number used by Rotctld,  as I did for
Rigctld to the SSH command would do the job. 

Of course it doesn't : When I send the SSH command from the remote
computer, I get an error message, and SSH do not start. So my first
question will be very simple : is there any difference in the network
connexion between Rigctld and Rotctld ? 

>From the user side, they look like very similar at first glance.

I hope that you will be able to help me with this problem. I must add
that on the 'control computer', Rotctl runs perfectly, the command given
at the keyboard are transmitted to the rotator interface, and the
rotator moves to the requested position. 

Very 73

Patrick, F1EBK

----- End forwarded message -----

--

-- 

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."

Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Patrick | 27 Jul 23:36 2014
Picon

Newcomer

Hi all,

I am using hamlib since more than one year to control different
transceivers (TS-790, TS-2000) and had no problem  with it. Well, of
course i had troubles but hamlib was not involved in that, and all
problems are solved today.

I am using Ubuntu 12.04, and recently I moved to 14.04 with no
particular issue. All these transceivers where connected to the computer
by the mean of an interface box (Microham's MicroKeyer II) which comes
with it's piece of software... But everything was fine from the Hamlib
side.

Several weeks ago, I wanted to take the control of an old TS711 (okay,
i'm a Kenwood fan !). This kind of transceiver is rather old now, and
CAT control need a couple of interfaces to do the job. In this case to
prevent any problem, the transceiver is connected to the ttyS0 serial
port, an no audio is sent to the computer : this is the simplest CAT
test configuration that I could imagine. So I could fix all the hardware
issues that I met, and got control of the transceiver. I can change
mode, and event the RIT ( when you know how the RIT is handled by
Kenwood transceivers, this is really challenging ). But I never could
change the frequency... 

A short look on the rig matrix shows that the TS-771 has an untested
state. So could it be possible that the TS-711 has never been used with
Hamlib, and we have a problem in the frequency control ? 

If I can be of some help doing some test with the TS-711, I would really
be happy to do so.

Today, I am trying to control a rotator to get a full remote control of
the station, and of course got an issue with Rotctld. As this is a real
remote access, all communications are made by the mean of an SSH tunnel.
So I thought that adding the port number used by Rotctld,  as I did for
Rigctld to the SSH command would do the job. 

Of course it doesn't : When I send the SSH command from the remote
computer, I get an error message, and SSH do not start. So my first
question will be very simple : is there any difference in the network
connexion between Rigctld and Rotctld ? 

>From the user side, they look like very similar at first glance.

I hope that you will be able to help me with this problem. I must add
that on the 'control computer', Rotctl runs perfectly, the command given
at the keyboard are transmitted to the rotator interface, and the
rotator moves to the requested position. 

Very 73

Patrick, F1EBK

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Infragistics Professional
Build stunning WinForms apps today!
Reboot your WinForms applications with our WinForms controls. 
Build a bridge from your legacy apps to the future.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=153845071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
Hartinger Roland | 21 Jul 20:22 2014
Picon

Kenwood TS-590S fix

Hi all,

I fixed a problem with I found while controlling my Kenwood TS-590S when using 'rigctld' with the 'send_cmd' command.
The code in 'rigctld.c' use '\r' to terminate the 'send_cmd' command. This results in an error message from the rig resp. from the backend.

Therefore, I made the following change in 'rigctld.c' as shown in the following code-snippet:

// char send_cmd_term = '\r';  /* send_cmd termination char */
// DF1GR modification:
char send_cmd_term = ';';  /* send_cmd termination char */

The change works well and so I'm able to use the whole TS-590S command set.
Can somebody from you verify my change and iff it is correct, bring this in one of the next hamlib release, please!?

Thanks in advance,
vy73 de Roland (DF1GR)






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Hamlib-developer mailing list
Hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hamlib-developer
John Ronan | 20 Jul 18:52 2014
Picon

UBC785XLT (and probably others)

Hi Folks,

I got a UBC-785XLT not aso long ago, today I had a quick look at getting 
the frequency out of it with hamlib when the squelch is open (detecting 
that with another program)

There is no VFO in it so get_freq doesn't appear to ever work.

What does work though is get_mem.  See the example below when I manually 
opened the squelch.

Rig command: f
rigctl_parse: input_line: f
write_block(): TX 4 bytes
0000    52 46 3f 0d RF?.
read_string(): RX 4 characters
0000    45 52 52 0d ERR.
get_freq: error = Protocol error

Rig command: e
rigctl_parse: input_line: e
write_block(): TX 3 bytes
0000    4d 41 0d MA.
read_string(): RX 35 characters
0000    43 36 30 33 20 46 30 34 35 36 36 35 30 30 20 54     C603 F04566500 T
0010    46 20 44 4e 20 4c 46 20 41 46 20 52 4e 20 4e 30     F DN LF AF RN N0
0020    30 30 0d 00.
Memory#: 603

Rig command:

In my head given that there is no VFO get_freq should return whatever 
frequency the radio is on 'now', i.e. it is the frequency contained 
within the "MA" response.

Any thoughts before I go mucking with it? Or have I overlooked something 
completely obvious.

Regards
John
EI7IG

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
Jaroslav Skarvada | 3 Jul 14:12 2014
Picon

Correct location for python bindings

Hi,

it seems that python bindings are arch specific thus it should
be probably installed to pyexecdir instead of pythondir which is
noarch. Attached patch is what we used in Fedora. We do not
bootstrap, so that's why we also patch the Makefile.in file

thanks & regards

Jaroslav
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Hamlib-developer mailing list
Hamlib-developer <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hamlib-developer

Gmane